Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 14:2 (2022) ► pp.301–336

Old English V-initial and þa-VS main clauses

Independent constructions or allostructions?

| University of Lodz
This study is a corpus-based constructionist analysis of Old English (OE) constituent order, focusing on verb-initial declaratives and þa-VS main clauses. The main objective of the investigation is to determine the degree of the formal and functional similarity of both patterns in order to establish whether they functioned as two independent constructions (in Construction Grammar terms), with their relation based on functional contrast. The other possibility taken into consideration in the analysis is that the two patterns should rather be treated as variants of the same construction, as suggested in some previous, non-constructionist studies of the topic, which would make it possible to analyse them as allostructions. The study shows that on the general level of the language network, the two clause types are surprisingly different in many respects: their form is less similar than previously assumed, they have drastically different corpus distributions, they show different collocational preferences and perform different discourse functions. Nevertheless, on the lower level of the network, the two constructions show some overlaps in the presentational, narrative and reporting function. At the same time, however, there is a deep functional difference between texts authored by Ælfric and other OE prose records.
Keywords: Old English, main clause, þa-VS, V-initial, narrative inversion, allostructions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Horizontal relations between constructions in CxG
  • 3.V-initial and þa-VS clauses in OE syntax
    • 3.1Form
    • 3.2Function
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Form
    • 5.2Semantic range
    • 5.3Discourse function
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21002.cic
References (57)
References
Allen, C. L. (1995). Case marking and reanalysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacquet, P. (1962). La structure de la phrase verbale à l’époque Alfrédienne. Publications de la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Bately, J. (2009). Did King Alfred actually translate anything? The integrity of the Alfredian canon revisited. Medium Ævum, 78(2), 189–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bech, K. (2001). Word Order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. University of Bergen Ph.D. dissertation.
Biberauer, T. & Roberts, I. (2008). Subjects, tense and verb-movement in Germanic and Romance. In E. Lash, Y. Lin and T. Rainsford (Eds.), Cambridge occasional papers in linguistics 31 (pp. 24–43). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. Longman.Google Scholar
Calle-Martín, J. & Miranda-García, A. (2010). ‘Gehyrdon ge þæt gecweden wæs’ – a corpus-based approach to verb-initial constructions in Old English. Studia Neophilologica, 821, 49–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, B. (2006). Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions, 11, 1–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cichosz, A., P. Pęzik, M. Grabski, M. Adamczyk, P. Rybińska & A. Ostrowska. (2021). The VARIOE online morphological dictionary for YCOE. University of Łódź. (Available online at [URL])
Cichosz, A. (2020). Negation and Verb-initial Order in Old English main clauses. Journal of English Linguistics, 48(4), 355–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The constituent order of hwæt-clauses in Old English prose. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(1), 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a). Old English verbs of saying and the V1 order. English Language and Linguistics, 21(3), 533–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Verb-initial main clauses in Bede: A translation effect? In A. Kijak, J. Nykiel & A. M. Łęcki (Eds.), Current developments in English historical linguistics (pp. 68–89). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
(2017c). Inversion after clause-initial adverbs in Old English: The special status of þa, þonne, nu, and swa . Journal of English Linguistics, 45(4), 308–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cichosz, A., Gaszewski, J. & Pęzik, P. (2016). Element order in Old English and Old High German translations. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vaere, H., Kolkmann, J. & Belligh, T. (2020). Allostructions revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 96–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O., van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W. & van der Wurff, W. (2000). The syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2007). Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x.Google Scholar
(2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Healey DiPaolo, A. (2004). Dictionary of Old English Corpus (DOEC). University of Michigan Press. (Available online at [URL])
Hilpert, M. (2006). Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, T. (2013). Abstract phrasal and clausal constructions. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 307–328). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. van. (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, A. van & Westergaard, M. (2012). Syntax and Information structure: Verb-Second variation in Middle English. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. Jose Lopez-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English (pp. 87–118). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, A. van. (2012). Rethinking the loss of V2. In T. Nevalainen and E. Closs Traugott (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English (pp. 1182–199). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1995). Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (Eds.), Clause structure and language change (pp. 140–169). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (2003). Grammatical Approaches to Syntactic Change. In B. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 495–508). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2008). Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. [URL]
Los, B. (2000). Onginnan/beginnan with Bare and to-infinitive in Ælfric. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach & D. Stein (Eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English (pp. 251–74). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. José López-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English (pp. 21–46). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English Syntax. Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M. (2003). Functional perspectives on syntactic change. In B. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 552–572). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohkado, M. (2000). Verb first constructions in Old English, with special reference to Bede’s Ecclesiastical history of the English people . In M. Amano & H. Nakano (Eds.), Synchronic and diachronic studies on language: a festschrift for Dr. Hirozo Nakano. Nagoya University.Google Scholar
(2004). On the structure and function of V1 constructions in Old English. English Studies, 851, 2–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, S. (2006). A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. In Ishihara, S., Schmitz, M. & Schwarz, A. (Eds.), Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 5 (pp. 153–182). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S. (2003). Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In B. Joseph & E. Janda (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 509–528). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Garland.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. and C. L. Wrenn. (1957). An Old English grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Randall, B., Kroch, A. & A. Taylor. (2005–13). CorpusSearch 21.Google Scholar
Ringe, D. & A. Taylor. (2014). The development of Old English. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, E. & Sommerer, L. (2020). Introduction: The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1–44). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Robert. (1977). Motivations for exbraciation in Old English. In Ch. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 291–314). University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S. & Beths, F. (2003). The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE).Google Scholar
Uhrig, P. (2015). Why the principle of no synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 63(3), 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, F. (2014). Degeneracy: the maintenance of constructional networks. In: R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar (pp. 141–180). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, G. (2014). Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The status of hwæt in Old English. English Language and Linguistics, 171, 465–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, B. (2011). Connective or “disconnective” discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In A. Meurman-Solin & U. Lenker (Eds.), Studies in variation, contacts and change in English 8: Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages. VARIENG.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cichosz, Anna, Łukasz Grabowski & Piotr Pęzik
2024. Formulaic language in Old English prose. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:3 ► pp. 467 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.