Article published In:
Constructions and FramesVol. 14:2 (2022) ► pp.301–336
Old English V-initial and þa-VS main clauses
Independent constructions or allostructions?
This study is a corpus-based constructionist analysis of Old English (OE) constituent order, focusing on verb-initial declaratives and þa-VS main clauses. The main objective of the investigation is to determine the degree of the formal and functional similarity of both patterns in order to establish whether they functioned as two independent constructions (in Construction Grammar terms), with their relation based on functional contrast. The other possibility taken into consideration in the analysis is that the two patterns should rather be treated as variants of the same construction, as suggested in some previous, non-constructionist studies of the topic, which would make it possible to analyse them as allostructions. The study shows that on the general level of the language network, the two clause types are surprisingly different in many respects: their form is less similar than previously assumed, they have drastically different corpus distributions, they show different collocational preferences and perform different discourse functions. Nevertheless, on the lower level of the network, the two constructions show some overlaps in the presentational, narrative and reporting function. At the same time, however, there is a deep functional difference between texts authored by Ælfric and other OE prose records.
Keywords: Old English, main clause, þa-VS, V-initial, narrative inversion, allostructions
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Horizontal relations between constructions in CxG
- 3.V-initial and þa-VS clauses in OE syntax
- 3.1Form
- 3.2Function
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Results
- 5.1Form
- 5.2Semantic range
- 5.3Discourse function
- 6.Summary and conclusions
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Allen, C. L.
(1995) Case marking and reanalysis. Oxford University Press.
Bacquet, P.
(1962) La structure de la phrase verbale à l’époque Alfrédienne. Publications de la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Strasbourg.
Bately, J.
(2009)
Did King Alfred actually translate anything? The integrity of the Alfredian canon revisited. Medium Ævum, 78(2), 189–215. 
Bech, K.
(2001) Word Order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. University of Bergen Ph.D. dissertation.
Biberauer, T. & Roberts, I.
(2008) Subjects, tense and verb-movement in Germanic and Romance. In E. Lash, Y. Lin and T. Rainsford (Eds.), Cambridge occasional papers in linguistics 31 (pp. 24–43). Cambridge University Press.
Bolinger, D.
(1977) Meaning and form. Longman.
Calle-Martín, J. & Miranda-García, A.
(2010) ‘Gehyrdon ge þæt gecweden wæs’ – a corpus-based approach to verb-initial constructions in Old English. Studia Neophilologica, 821, 49–57.
Cappelle, B.
(2006) Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions, 11, 1–28.
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton De Gruyter.
Cichosz, A., P. Pęzik, M. Grabski, M. Adamczyk, P. Rybińska & A. Ostrowska
(2021) The VARIOE online morphological dictionary for YCOE. University of Łódź. (Available online at [URL])
Cichosz, A.
(2020) Negation and Verb-initial Order in Old English main clauses. Journal of English Linguistics, 48(4), 355–381.
(2018) The constituent order of hwæt-clauses in Old English prose. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(1), 1–42.
(2017a) Old English verbs of saying and the V1 order. English Language and Linguistics, 21(3), 533–558.
(2017b) Verb-initial main clauses in Bede: A translation effect? In A. Kijak, J. Nykiel & A. M. Łęcki (Eds.), Current developments in English historical linguistics (pp. 68–89). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
(2017c) Inversion after clause-initial adverbs in Old English: The special status of þa, þonne, nu, and swa
. Journal of English Linguistics, 45(4), 308–337.
Cichosz, A., Gaszewski, J. & Pęzik, P.
De Vaere, H., Kolkmann, J. & Belligh, T.
(2020) Allostructions revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 1701, 96–111.
Dehe, N.
Fischer, O., van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W. & van der Wurff, W.
(2000) The syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago University Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
Gries, S. T.
(2007) Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
(2003) Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum.
Gries, S. T. & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129.
Healey DiPaolo, A.
(2004) Dictionary of Old English Corpus (DOEC). University of Michigan Press. (Available online at [URL])
Hilpert, M.
(2006) Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 243–256.
Hoffman, T.
(2013) Abstract phrasal and clausal constructions. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 307–328). Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R.
(1997) The architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press.
Kemenade, A. van
(1987) Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Foris.
Kemenade, A. van & Westergaard, M.
(2012) Syntax and Information structure: Verb-Second variation in Middle English. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. Jose Lopez-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English (pp. 87–118). Oxford University Press.
Kemenade, A. van
(2012) Rethinking the loss of V2. In T. Nevalainen and E. Closs Traugott (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English (pp. 1182–199). Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, P.
(1995) Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (Eds.), Clause structure and language change (pp. 140–169). Oxford University Press.
Lightfoot, D.
(2003) Grammatical Approaches to Syntactic Change. In B. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 495–508). Blackwell.
Labov, W.
Los, B.
(2000) Onginnan/beginnan with Bare and to-infinitive in Ælfric. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach & D. Stein (Eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English (pp. 251–74). John Benjamins.
(2012) The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. José López-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English (pp. 21–46). Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, B.
(1985) Old English Syntax. Clarendon Press.
Mithun, M.
(2003) Functional perspectives on syntactic change. In B. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 552–572). Blackwell.
Ohkado, M.
(2000) Verb first constructions in Old English, with special reference to Bede’s Ecclesiastical history of the English people
. In M. Amano & H. Nakano (Eds.), Synchronic and diachronic studies on language: a festschrift for Dr. Hirozo Nakano. Nagoya University.
(2004) On the structure and function of V1 constructions in Old English. English Studies, 851, 2–16.
Perek, F.
Petrova, S.
(2006) A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. In Ishihara, S., Schmitz, M. & Schwarz, A. (Eds.), Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 5 (pp. 153–182). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
Pintzuk, S.
(2003) Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In B. Joseph & E. Janda (Eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 509–528). Blackwell.
(1999) Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Garland.
Quirk, R. and C. L. Wrenn
(1957) An Old English grammar. Routledge.
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Randall, B., Kroch, A. & A. Taylor
(2005–13) CorpusSearch 21.
Ringe, D. & A. Taylor
(2014) The development of Old English. Oxford University Press.
Smirnova, E. & Sommerer, L.
(2020) Introduction: The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1–44). John Benjamins.
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–43.
Stockwell, Robert
(1977) Motivations for exbraciation in Old English. In Ch. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 291–314). University of Texas Press.
Taylor, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S. & Beths, F.
(2003) The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE).
Uhrig, P.
(2015) Why the principle of no synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 63(3), 323–337.
Van de Velde, F.
(2014) Degeneracy: the maintenance of constructional networks. In: R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar (pp. 141–180). Mouton de Gruyter.
Walkden, G.
(2014) Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford University Press.
(2013) The status of hwæt in Old English. English Language and Linguistics, 171, 465–488.
Wårvik, B.
(2011) Connective or “disconnective” discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In A. Meurman-Solin & U. Lenker (Eds.), Studies in variation, contacts and change in English 8: Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages. VARIENG.