Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 14:2 (2022) ► pp.262–300

Modelling polysemy and categorial ambiguity in a constructional family

The case of agentive compounds in Persian

| University of Isfahan
| University of Isfahan
| Leiden University
In this paper we analyse a family of compound constructions in Persian that show two interesting properties: (1) they split into two semantic patterns, human agent noun and instrument noun, and (2) they display categorial ambiguity between noun and adjective. The compounds in question, which are formed with the verbal stem -yāb ‘find’, are collected from diachronic and synchronic corpora and analysed in the framework of Construction Morphology (Booij 2010). We argue that the instrumental pattern is an innovation under the influence of loan-translated English instrument nouns. This pattern dovetailed with a much older morphological construction for human agent nouns. This raises questions about the relation between the two constructions in the contemporary speaker’s lexicon. For the dual functionality of the words as nouns and adjectives, we argue that it can be understood as a second order schema (Booij & Masini 2015) or sister construction (Jackendoff & Audring 2019, 2020), whereby no precedence is ascribed to either of the two patterns.
Keywords: Construction Morphology, polysemy, compound, partial motivation, sister constructions, second-order schemas, Persian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Construction morphology
  • 3.Semantic classification
  • 4.Relations within the constructional family
    • 4.1Metaphorical extension of human agent to instrument
    • 4.2The diachrony of the [X-yāb] compounds
    • 4.3Loan translation
    • 4.4Relatedness
  • 5.Agent nouns and agentive adjectives as sister constructions
    • 5.1Nominal and adjectival uses
      • 5.1.1Syntactic configurations
      • 5.1.2Morphological and semantic configurations
    • 5.2Sister constructions
  • 6.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 22 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21007.azi
References (59)
References
Al-Biruni, M. (5th century AH / 11th century AD). The exhaustive treatise on shadows, translated by E. S. Kennedy (1976). Institute for the History of Arabic Science.Google Scholar
Anvari, H., & Ahmadi Givi, H. (1999). Persian grammar, Vol. 2 (Dasture Zabān-e Fārsi, jeld 2). Fatemi. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Audring, J. (2019). Mothers or sisters? The encoding of morphological knowledge. Word Structure, 12 (3), 274–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beard, R. (1990). The nature and origins of derivational polysemy. Lingua, 81 1, 101–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. (1986). Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’. Linguistics, 24 1, 503–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The Grammar of words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Morphological analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysis (pp. 563–589). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012). Construction Morphology, a brief introduction. Morphology, 22 1, 343–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Inheritance and motivation in Construction Morphology. In N. Gisborne & A. Hippisley (Eds.), Defaults in Morphological Theory (pp. 18–39). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G. & Audring, J. (2018). Partial motivation, multiple motivation: The role of output schemas in morphology. In G. Booij (Ed.), The construction of words. Advances in Construction Morphology (pp. 59–80). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G., & Masini, F. (2015). The role of second order schemas in the construction of complex words. In L. Bauer, L. Körtvèlyessy & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Semantics of complex words (pp. 47–66). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2007). Construction Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 463–509). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
HasanDoust, M. (2013). Persian etymological dictionary (Farhange Riʃe ʃenɑ̃xtiye Zaban-e Farsi). Academy of Persian Language and Literature. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Th., & Trousdale, G. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2019). Relational Morphology in the Parallel Architecture. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory (pp. 390–408). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2020). The texture of the lexicon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, A. (2014). Revisiting the Persian ezafe construction: A Roll-up Movement Analysis. Lingua, 150 1, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalbasi, I. (1992). The derivative structure of words in Modern Persian (Sāxt-e Ešteqāqi-ye Vāʒe dar Fārsi-ye Emrouz). Institute of Humanity and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Keshani, Kh. (1993). Zansu Dictionary (Farhang-e Zānsu). University Publication Center. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Khanlari, P. (1973). Persian Grammar (Dastur-e zabān-e Fārsi). Toos. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Khatibi, A. (2007). Comprehensive Persian Language Dictionary, Persian Lexicography Corpus and Computer-based Language Corpus (Farhang-e Jāmeɂ-e Zabān-e Fārsi, Peykare-ye Farhangnegāri-ye Fārsi va Peykare-hā-ye Rāyaneɂiye Zabān). Lexigraphy, 1 (1), 4–60. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Khayyampour, A. (1993). Persian Grammar (Dastur-e zabān-e Fārsi). Sotoude. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Khormaee, A. (2008). Clipped compound agentive adjectives: Yes or No? (Sefat-e fāɂeli-ye morakab-e moraxam: āri yā xeir?). Language and Linguistics, 4 (7), 64–80. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Lazard, G. (2005). A grammar of contemporary Persian. Mazda Publications in assoc. with Bibliotheca Persica.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, J. (2005). Romanische Wortbildung. Inhaltlich – diachronisch – synchronisch. Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Luschützky, H. Ch., & Rainer, F. (2011). Agent noun polysemy in cross-linguistic perspective. Language Typology and Universals, 64 (4), 287–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mashkur, M. J. (1989). A Pamphlet on Persian morphology and syntax (Dasturnāme dar Sarf va Nahv-e Zabān-e Pārsi). Institute of the East Press. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Masini, F., & Audring, J. (2019). Construction Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory (pp. 365–389). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1968). Manual de gramática histórica española (13th edition). Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Meshkatoddini, M. (2005). Persian grammar (Dastur-e zabān-e Fārsi). Samt. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1890). Italienische Grammatik. Reisland.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. E. (2006). The astrolabe. Janus.Google Scholar
Nobahar, M. (1993). Practical Persian grammar (Dastur-e Kārbordi-ye Zabān-e Fārsi). Hafez. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Panagl, O. (1975). Kasustheorie und Nomina Agentis. In H. Rix (Ed.), Flexion und Wortbildung. Akten der V. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Regensburg, 9–14 September 1973 (pp. 232–146). Reichert.Google Scholar
(1978). Agens und Instrument in der Wortbildung. In W. U. Dressler & W. Meid (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Linguists. Vienna, 28 August- 2 September 1977 (pp. 453–456). Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Rafiei, A. (2008). A study of the semantics of Persian derivational suffixes (Barresiye Maɂnāɂiye Vandhāye Ešteqāqiye Farsi), Ph.D dissertation, Allameh Tabataba’i University. [In Persian]
Rafiei, A., & Rezaei, H. (2018). Derived nouns ending in -gar based on Construction Morphology (Sāxt-e Asāmi-ye Moštaq az -gar az Manzar-e Sarf-e Sāxti). Jostārhāye Zabāni, 10 (3), 71–94. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Rainer, F. (2004a). Del nombre de agente al nombre de instrument en español: ¿Cómo y cuándo? Iberoromania, 59 1, 97–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004b). L’origine dei nomi di strumento italiani in -tor. In T. Krisch, T. Lindner, & U. Müller (Eds.), Analecta homini universali dicata. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag. Vol.11 (pp. 399–424). Heinz.Google Scholar
(2005a). Noms d’instruments/ de lieux en -tor dans la Galloromania, Vox Romanica, 64 1, 121–140.Google Scholar
(2005b). Semantic change in word formation. Linguistics, 43 (2), 415–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The agent-instrument-place “polysemy” of the suffix -tor in Romance. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 1 1, 5–12.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, A. A. (2001). Language planning in Iran: A historical review. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 148 1, 19–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Compounds formed with the present stem of a verb (Kalamāt-e Morakab-e Sāxtešode bā Setāk-e Feɂl). Farhangestan Journal, 1 (1), 5–11. [In Persian]Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2013). Comprehensive Persian Language Dictionary (Farhang-e Jāmeɂ-e Zabān-e Fārsi). Academy of Persian Language and Literature. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. Philosophical Library. (Translation of Cours de linguistique générale, 1915.)Google Scholar
Shaghaghi, V. (2012). Morphology: The Basics (Mabāni-ye Sarf). Samt. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Shariat, M. J. (1970). Persian Grammar (Dastur-e Zabān-e Fārsi). Asatir. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Shieber, S. M. (1986). An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Soltanigard Faramarzi, A. (1997). From word to discourse (Az Kalame tā Kalām). Heidari.Google Scholar
Tabataba’i, A. (2003a). Clipped compound agentive adjectives (Sefat-e Fāɂeli-ye Morakab-e Moraxam). Farhangestan Journal, 6 (2), 62–71. [In Persian].Google Scholar
(2003b). Persian noun and adjective compounds (Esm va Sefat-e Morakab dar Zaban-e Farsi). Markaz nashre daneshgahi. [In Persian]Google Scholar
(2014). Compounding in Persian (Tarkib dar Zabān-e Fārsi). Academy of Persian Language and Literature. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Torabi, S. (2014). A Construction Morphology Account of Agentive Suffixes in Persian (Barresiye Vandhā-ye Ešteqāqiye Esm-e ɂāmelsāz-e Zabān-e Farsi dar Čārčub-e Sarf-e Sāxtmehvar), MA thesis, University of Isfahan. [In Persian]
Vahidian Kamyar, T.; Omrani, Q. (2006). Persian Grammar, Vol. 1 (Dasture Zabān-e Fārsi, jeld 1). Samt. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Zomorrodiyan, R. (1970). The structure of words in Modern Persian (Sāxteman-e Kalame dar Zabān-e Fārsi-ye Konuni). Jostārhāye Zabāni, 21 1, 177–201. [In Persian]Google Scholar