Article published In:
Constructions and Frames: Online-First Articles

Creation in the semantics of verbs and constructions

A force-dynamic analysis of the argument structure of creation verbs in Brazilian Portuguese

ORCID logo | Federal University of Minas Gerais
Creation verbs are traditionally divided into at least two classes: verbs of creation of an entity and verbs of image creation. Such classification analyses face two important problems: how to account for the common creation semantics and how to explain the behavior of verbs which can describe either type of creation. Assuming a cognitive-semantic approach and based on Brazilian Portuguese data, this paper proposes that types of creation are different construals of a unified creation event, represented as a frame-based causal chain. Thus, the common creation semantics is defined as a causal chain, which is evoked by creation verbs in general, and the distinct properties of different classes of creation verbs follow from profiling of specific parts of that frame via argument structure constructions. Some creation verbs are lexically constrained as to how they construe the creation event, but others have the potential to construe the event in different ways.
Keywords: creation verbs, construction, frame, event structure, force dynamics, argument structure
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A force-dynamic theory of argument structure
  • 3.A unified representation for the creation event
  • 4.Different construals of the creation event
    • 4.1Creation of an entity
    • 4.2Creation of a representation of an entity
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 January 2025
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.22024.lop
References (27)
References
Amaral, L. (2016). A polysemy account of alternating verbs of creation in Brazilian Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 9 1, 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amaral, L., & Cançado, M. (2014). Verbos de criação do português brasileiro: Classificação e representação lexical [Creation verbs in Brazilian Portuguese: Classification and lexical representation]. Revista Linguística, 10 (1), 51–73.Google Scholar
Boas, H. (2011). A frame-semantic approach to syntactic alternations with build-verbs. In P. Guerrero Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English (pp. 207–234). Equinox.Google Scholar
Borba, F. (Coord.) (1990). Dicionário gramatical de verbos do português contemporâneo do Brasil. 2. ed. Editora da Unesp.Google Scholar
Cançado, M., Godoy, L., & Amaral, L. (2013). Catálogo de verbos do português brasileiro: Classificação verbal segundo a decomposição de predicados. Editora da UFMG.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: a false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Force dynamics and directed change in event lexicalization and argument realization. In R. G. de Almeida & C. Manouilidou (Eds.), Cognitive science perspectives on verb representation and processing (pp.103–130). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Project Background and Aims. In Developing language-independent event representations that are inferable from linguistic expressions in large text corpora [Technical report]. University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Kalm, P. (2021). Contributions to event semantic representation and interpretation. In Developing language-independent event representations that are inferable from linguistic expressions in large text corpora [Technical report]. University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Pešková, P., & Regan, M. (2016). Annotation of causal and aspectual structure of events in RED: A preliminary report. Paper presented at the 4th Events Workshop, 15th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT 2016), Stroudsburg, Penn. Retrieved from: [URL]
Croft, W., & Vigus, M. (2017). Constructions, frames and event structure. Paper presented at the AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding (AAAI Technical Report SS-17-02), Stanford. Retrieved from: [URL]
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague Grammar. D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1986). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In D. Feder, M. Niepokuj, V. Nikiforidou, & M. Van Clay (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 12) (pp. 95–107). Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Jezek, E. (2014). Classes of creation verbs. In R. Simone & F. Masini (Eds.), Word classes: Nature, typology and representations (pp. 37–50). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalm, P. (2021). Physical Domain Verbs. In Developing language-independent event representations that are inferable from linguistic expressions in large text corpora [Technical report]. University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Kalm, P., Regan, M., & Croft, W. (2019). Event structure representation: Between verbs and argument structure constructions. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Designing Meaning Representations (DMR 2019), Stroudsburg, Penn. Retrieved from: [URL]
Kalm, P., Regan, M., Lee, S., Peverada, C., & Croft, W. (2020). Representing constructional metaphors. Paper presented at the Second International Workshop on Designing Meaning Representations (DMR 2020), Stroudsburg, Penn. Retrieved from: [URL]
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006). English object alternations: A unified account [unpublished manuscript]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Mccready, E. (2006). Created objects, coherence and anaphora. Journal of Semantics, 23 (3), 251–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piñón, C. (2007). Verbs of creation. In J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, & M. Schäfer (Eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation (pp. 493–522). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010). Draw. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure (pp. 270–283). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Mairal, R. (2011). Constraints on syntactic alternation: Lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical Constructional Model. In P. Guerrero Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English: Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 62–82). Equinox.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., & Michaelis, L. (2009). Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English. In S. K. Bourns & L. L. Myers (Eds.), Perspectives on linguistic structure and context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht (pp. 57–86). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar