References (38)
References
Batchelor, R. E. & Pountain, C. J. (2005). Using Spanish: A guide to contemporary usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 1, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamoreau, C. (2017). Multifunctionality and polysemy of the similative marker =kan in Pesh. In Y. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 321–337). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cover, T. & Thomas, J. A. (2006). Elements of information theory. 2nd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darmon, C. (2017). The morpheme (a)ŋa in Xamtanga: Functions and grammaticalization targets. In Y. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 359–385). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). A dynamic network approach to the study of syntax. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 1, Article 604853. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. & Plonsky, L. (2020). Bootstrapping techniques. In M. Paquot & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Practical handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 593–610). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, S. (2009). Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, Vol. 21 (pp. 1212–1248). Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. & Kay, P. (1999). Construction Grammar. University of California.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. (2010). Similitude: A conceptual category. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 42 1, 117–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2014). La comparaison et son expression en francais. Ophrys.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2005). Null-hypothesis significance testing of word frequencies: A follow-up on Kilgarriff. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11, 277–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24 1, 385–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Statistics for linguistics with R. 3rd ed. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. (2022a). What do (some of) our association measures measure (most)? Association? Journal of Second Language Studies, 51, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022b). Towards more careful corpus statistics: Uncertainty estimates for frequencies, dispersions, association measures, and more. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1 1, 100002. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2023). Overhauling collostructional analysis: Towards more descriptive simplicity and more explanatory adequacy. Cognitive Semantics. Online Publication Date: 07 Aug 2023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 1, 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. (1954). Distributional structure. Word, 10 1, 146–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & Buchholz, O. (1998). Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In J. Van der Auwera (Ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (pp. 277–334). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henkelmann, P. (2006). Constructions of equative comparison. STUF — Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 59 1, 370–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hetterle, K. (2015). Adverbial clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation, and syntax. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Ten lectures on diachronic construction grammar. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (1999). Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30 1, 15–33.Google Scholar
Jiménez Juliá, T. (2003). Como en español actual. Verba, 30 1, 117–161.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Olguín Martínez, J. (2021). Hypothetical manner constructions in world-wide perspective. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads, 1 1, 2–33.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Schulze, W. (2017). Toward a cognitive typology of like-expressions. In Y. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 33–78). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 1, 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, R. (1990). Sobre la explicación de algunas construcciones de como . Verba, 17 1, 249–266.Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1984). The verbs of perception: A typological study. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & Ö. Dahl (eds), Explanations for language universals (pp. 123–162). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S. (2008). Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. ContinuumGoogle Scholar