Article published In:
Frames, constructions, and computationEdited by Lars Borin, Gerard de Melo, Karin Friberg Heppin and Tiago Timponi Torrent
[Constructions and Frames 6:1] 2014
► pp. 34–51
Edited by Lars Borin, Gerard de Melo, Karin Friberg Heppin and Tiago Timponi Torrent
[Constructions and Frames 6:1] 2014
► pp. 34–51
Revisiting border conflicts between FrameNet and Construction Grammar
Annotation policies for the Brazilian Portuguese Constructicon
This paper proposes three policies for the annotation of constructions in FrameNet Brasil, and, potentially, in other FrameNets. Annotation policies are defined so as to both avoid uncontrolled redundancy in the database and respect the theoretical and methodological foundations of Frame Semantics and Construction Grammar. The first policy is concerned with the task of deciding whether a given piece of language should be analyzed as an instance of a construction, or as a valence pattern of a lexical unit; the second specifies criteria for the definition of Construct Elements; finally, the third policy regulates the interconnections between constructions and frames in the database.
References (26)
Atkins, S., Fillmore, C. J., & Johnson, C. R. (2003). Lexicographic relevance: selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3), 251–280. 
Bardđal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bardđal, J., Kristoffersen, K. E., & Sveen, A. (2011). West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP construction. Linguistics, 49(1), 53–104.
Brodbeck, R. C. M. S. (2010). Um monte de problemas gera uma chuva de respostas: um estudo de caso de desencontro na quantificação nominal em português. [A mount of questions generates a rain of answers: A study of mismatch in noun quantification constructions in Portuguese]. PhD Dissertation in Linguistics,Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora.
Elmasri, R., & Navathe, S. (2010). Fundamentals of database systems. Boston: Addition Wesley.
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic society of korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.
1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 61, 222–254.
2006). The articulation of lexicon and constructicon. Plenary talk at the Fourth International Construction Grammar Conference (pp. 53–63). Tokyo.
2008a). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets construction grammar. In
Proceedings of EURALEX
131 (pp. 49–68). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
2008b).
Wherewithal: eine verborgene konstruktion. In A. Stefanowitsch & K. Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der konstruktion zur grammatik (pp. 279–283). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
2013). Berkeley construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 111–132). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language, 641, 501–538.
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250.
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. R., & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet constructicon. In H. C. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 309–372). Stanford: CSLI.
FrameNet (2014). Berkeley FrameNet website. [URL].
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y construction. Language, 751, 1–34.
Lage, L. M. (2013). Frames e construções: A implementação do constructicon na FrameNet Brasil. [Frames and constructions: The implementation of the constructicon in FrameNet Brasil]. M. A. Thesis in Linguistics. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora.
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Forsberg, M., Prentice, J., Rydstedt, R., Sköldberg, E., & Tingsell, S. (2012). Adding a constructicon to the Swedish resource network of Språkbanken. In
Proceedings of KONVENS 2012
(pp. 452–461). Vienna.
Ohara, K. (2013). Toward constructicon building for Japanese in Japanese FrameNet. Veredas, 17(1), 11–27.
Salomão, M. M. M. (1990).
Polysemy, aspect and modality in Brazilian Portuguese: The case for a cognitive explanation of grammar
. PhD Dissertation in Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley.
2007). The metaphoric grounding of grammar: The modal construction with ‘give’ in Brazilian Portuguese. In
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society
. University of California, Berkeley.
Subirats, C. (2013). Frames, constructions, and metaphors in Spanish FrameNet. In I. Verdaguer, N. J. Laso & D. Salazar (Eds.), Biomedical English: A corpus-based approach (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Torrent, T. T. (2009). A Rede de construções em para (SN) infinitivo: Uma abordagem centrada no uso para as relações de herança e mudança construcionais.[The para infinitive construction network: A usage-based approach for constructional inheritance and constructional change]. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Torrent, T. T., & Ellsworth, M. (2013). Behind the labels: Criteria for defining analytical categories in FrameNet Brasil. Veredas, 17(1), 44–65.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Bychkova, Polina & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2023. Chapter 3. Towards pragmatic construction typology. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 35 ff. 
Czulo, Oliver, Alexander Willich, Alexander Ziem & Tiago T. Torrent
2023. A multilingual approach to the interaction between frames and constructions. Constructions and Frames 15:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Janda, Laura A., Anna Endresen, Valentina Zhukova, Daria Mordashova & Ekaterina Rakhilina
Li, Xiaochen & Mingyou Xiang
2019. Semantic evolution at the microscopic level: the case of suoyi. Language Sciences 74 ► pp. 110 ff.
Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten
2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 354 ff.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Tiago Timponi Torrent, Adrieli Laviola, Linnéa Bäckström, Anna Helga Hannesdóttir & Ely Edison da Silva Matos
2018. Chapter 9. Aligning constructicons across languages. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 255 ff.
Ohara, Kyoko
2018. Chapter 5. Relations between frames and constructions. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 141 ff.
Torrent, Tiago Timponi, Ely Edison da Silva Matos, Ludmila Meireles Lage, Adrieli Laviola, Tatiane da Silva Tavares, Vânia Gomes de Almeida & Natália Sathler Sigiliano
2018. Chapter 4. Towards continuity between the lexicon and the constructicon in FrameNet Brasil. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 107 ff.
TORRENT, Tiago Timponi, Ludmila Meireles LAGE, Tatiane Silva TAVARES & Adrieli Bonjour LAVIOLA
2017. Relações de herança entre construções e entre frames: desafios da extensão do modelo construcionista para o domínio computacional no âmbito da FrameNet Brasil. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.