Usage-based CxG approaches share the central assumption that any grammar has to be acquired and organised through input-based abstraction and categorisation. Diasystematic Construction Grammar (DCxG) is based on the idea that these processes are not sensitive to language boundaries. Multilingual input thus results in multilingual grammars which are conceived of as constructicons containing language-specific as well as language-unspecific constructions. Within such systems, phonological structures play an important part in the identification of schematic constructions. However, the status of phonology in DCxG, as in CxG in general, yet remains unclear. This paper presents some arguments for including phonological elements systematically in the construction-based analysis of (multilingual) constructional systems.
Basbøll, H. (2003). Prosody, productivity and word structure: The stød pattern of Modern Danish. Nordic journal of linguistics, 261, 5–44.
Bergen, B.K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 801, 290–311.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., Green, D.W., & Gollan, T.H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological science in the public interest, 101, 89–129.
Bloomfield, L. (1965). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.
Boas, H.C. (2013). Cognitive Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 233–254). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
Boyd, J.K., & Goldberg, A.E. (2011). Learning what not to say: the role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 871, 55–83.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
Diewald, G. (2006). Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions, special volume 11, 9.
Diewald, G. (2007). Konstruktionen in der diachronen Sprachwissenschaft. In K. Fischer & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (pp. 79–103). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Diewald, G. (2009). Konstruktionen und Paradigmen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 371, 445–468.
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2004). Construction Grammar. A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of pragmatics, 371, 1752–1778.
Gil, D. (2011). Para-linguistic usages of clicks. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (Chapter 142). Munich <[URL]>, 1 March 2013.
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
Grice, M., Baumann, S., & Benzmüller, R. (2005). German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In Sun-Ah Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 55–83). Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and language, 361, 3–15.
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.
Günthner, S., & Imo, W. (Eds.). (2006). Konstruktionen in der Interaktion. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Haugen, E. (1956). Bilingualism in the Americas. A bibliography and research guide. University of Alabama Press.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2005). Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, M. (2011). Was ist Konstruktionswandel? In A. Lasch & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 59–75). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Höder, S. (2014b). Convergence vs. divergence from a diasystematic perspective. In K. Braunmüller, S. Höder & K.H. Kühl (Eds.), Stability and divergence in language contact. Factors and mechanisms (pp. 39–60), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Höder, S. (2014c). Low German: A profile of a word language – and why it matters. In J. Caro Reina & R. Szczepaniak (Eds.), Syllable and word languages (pp. 305–326). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Lambrecht, K. 1990. “What me worry?” ‘Mad Magazine sentences’ revisited. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 161, 215–228.
Lüdi, G. (1996). Mehrsprachigkeit. In H. Goebl, et al. (Eds.), Contact linguistics. An international handbook of contemporary research, Vol. 11 (pp. 233–245). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Martinet, A. (1949). La double articulation linguistique. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, 51, 30–37.
Matras, Y. (2009). Language contact. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J.J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic inquiry, 121, 373–418.
Oksaar, E. (1980). Mehrsprachigkeit, Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. In P.H. Nelde (Ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt (pp. 43–52). Wiesbaden: Steiner.
Östman, J.-O. (2005). Construction discourse. A prolegomenon. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pietsch, L. (2010). What has changed in Hiberno-English: Constructions and their role in contact-induced change. Language typology and universals, 631, 118–145.
Riad, T. (2009). Prosodi i svenskans ordbildning och ordböjning. <[URL]>, 15 August 2014.
Rubba, J. (1993). Discontinuous morphology in Modern Aramaic. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
Schachtenhaufen, R. (2010). Schwa-assimilation og stavelsesgrænser. Nydanske sprogstudier, 391, 64–92.
Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
Traugott, E.C. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–347). Malden etc.: Blackwell.
Vihman, M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 451, 683–725.
Weinreich, U. (1954). Is a structural dialectology possible?Word, 101, 388–400.
Weinreich, U. (1964/1953). Languages in contact. Findings and problems. 3rd edn. London/The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
2020. Jürgen Erfurt & Sabine De Knop (Hg.). 2019.Konstruktionsgrammatik und Mehrsprachigkeit(OBST 94). Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr. 204 S.. Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 12:1-2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Höder, Steffen
2019. Phonological schematicity in multilingual constructions: A diasystematic perspective on lexical form. Word Structure 12:3 ► pp. 334 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.