Cover not available
Part of
Landscapes of Realism: Rethinking literary realism in comparative perspectives
Edited by Dirk Göttsche, Rosa Mucignat and Robert Weninger
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXII] 2021
► pp. 65–79

The contest of realism

German Marxist “realism debates” from the 1930s to the 1950s

The community of German-language Marxist intellectuals living in exile in the 1930s was riven by the so-called “Expressionism Debate,” often also referred to as “Realism Debate.” In essays published in the Moscow-based exile journal Das Wort in 1937 and 1938, the initial contributors to the debate castigated expressionism, a quintessentially German variant of avantgarde experimentalism, for facilitating Nazism’s rise to power due to its bourgeois aestheticist atavism; later contributors, some of whom had themselves begun their literary careers as expressionists, defended expressionism, arguing that avantgarde experimentation is not inherently reactionary, nor must it be considered antithetical to a Marxist aesthetics. This exploratory essay tracks the debate from its inception in Das Wort through its late-1930s extensions, specifically the Seghers-Lukács-correspondence and Bertolt Brecht’s numerous essay fragments directed against Georg Lukács (fragments published only after Brecht’s death in 1956), to the 1950/1960s Lukács-Adorno debate (inasmuch as it can be called a debate), recapitulating the “Expressionism Debate’s” relevance for the discussion of realism, Marxism and literary experimentalism.

Keywords: realism, Expressionism Debate, Marxist literary theory, Ernst Bloch, Georg Lukács, Bertolt Brecht, Theodor W. Adorno
Article outline
  • 1.The opening volleys
  • 2.Responding to Lukács: Seghers’s and Brecht’s ripostes
  • 3.Adorno takes over
  • 4.No end in sight
  • Notes
  • Works cited
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxii.02wen
References

Works cited

Adorno, Theodor W.
1961 “Erpreßte Versöhnung: Zu Georg Lukács: Wider den mißverstandenen Realismus .” In Noten zur Literatur, vol. 2, 152–87. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1974 Ästhetische Theorie, edited by Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann. Second edition. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1980 “Reconciliation under Duress,” translated by Rodney Livingstone. In Aesthetics and Politics: Ernst Bloch, Georg Lukács, Bertolt Brecht, Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, 151–76. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1991 “Extorted Reconciliation: On Georg Lukács’ Realism in Our Time .” In Notes to Literature, vol. 1, edited by Rolf Tiedemann, 216–40. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1997 Aesthetic Theory, translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst
1973 Erbschaft dieser Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1990 Heritage of Our Times, translated by Neville and Stephen Plaice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt
1967 Schriften zur Literatur und Kunst 2: 1934–1941. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1973a [Untitled entries for “10.9.38” and “february 39”]. In Bertolt Brecht Arbeitsjournal, vol. 1: 1938 bis 1942, edited by Werner Hecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1973b “Die Brecht-Polemik gegen Lukács.” In Die Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption, edited by Hans-Jürgen Schmitt, 302–36. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1980 “Against Georg Lukács.” In Aesthetics and Politics: Ernst Bloch, Georg Lukács, Bertolt Brecht, Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, 68–85. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1993a Bertolt Brecht Journals, edited by John Willett, translated by Hugh Rorrison. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1993b Schriften 2, Part 1, edited by Werner Hecht, Jan Knopf, Werner Mittenzwei and Klaus-Detlef Müller. Berlin and Weimar: Aufbau Verlag and Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
2003 “The Expressionism Debate.” In Brecht on Art and Politics, edited by Steve Giles and Tom Kuhn, translated by Laura Bradley, Steve Giles and Tom Kuhn, 213–14. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst H.
1983 Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation [1959] Oxford: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Luc
1996 “The Marxist Debate in the 1950s and Early 1960s.” In Concepts of Realism, 137–52. Columbia, SC: Camden House.Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe
2011 “The Theory of the Novel and the Concept of Realism in Lukács and Adorno.” In Georg Lukács Reconsidered: Critical Essays in Politics, Philosophy and Aesthetics, edited by Michael J. Thompson, 75–98. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 “Realism in Art” [1921] In Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, edited by Ladislav Matejka and Krystyna Pomor, 38–46. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knopf, Jan
2003 Brecht–Handbuch, vol. 4: Schriften, Journale, Briefe. Stuttgart and Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg
1963 The Meaning of Contemporary Realism, translated by John and Necke Mander. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
1969 “»Größe und Verfall« des Expressionismus.” In Marxismus und Literatur, edited by Fritz J. Raddatz, 2 vols, vol. 2, 7–42. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
1973 “Es geht um den Realismus.” In Die Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption, edited by Hans-Jürgen Schmitt, 192–230. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1980 “Realism in the Balance.” In Aesthetics and Politics: Ernst Bloch, Georg Lukács, Bertolt Brecht, Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, 28–59. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mirsky, Dmitry Petrovich
1970 “Mirsky on Bourgeois Decadence” [first published as “Dzheims Dzhois” in Almanakh: God (Moscow) 16.1 (1933): 428–50]. In James Joyce: The Critical Heritage, edited by Robert H. Deming, vol. 2, 589–92. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Seghers, Anna, and Georg Lukács
1973 “Ein Briefwechsel zwischen Anna Seghers und Georg Lukács” [correspondence 1938/1939, first published 1939]. In Die Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption, edited by Hans-Jürgen Schmitt, 264–301. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Walden, Herwarth
1973 “Vulgär-Expressionismus.” In Die Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption, edited by Hans-Jürgen Schmitt, 75–90. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Weninger, Robert
2012 “ ‘“Concordances” of Utter Chaos Post Rem’: A Portrait of James Joyce as a Chapter in German (Marxist) Literary History.” In The German Joyce, 174–203. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Bernhard [pseud. of Alfred Kurella].
1973 “Nun ist dies Erbe zuende….” In Die Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption, edited by Hans-Jürgen Schmitt, 50–60. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar