How generative is phonology? (On listing phonological surface forms in the lexicon)

Hsieh, Hsin-I

doi:10.1075/cilt.1.07hsi

Part of

The Transformational-Generative Paradigm and Modern Linguistic Theory
Edited by E.F.K. Koerner †
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 1] 1975
► pp. 109–144

How generative is phonology? (On listing phonological surface forms in the lexicon)

Hsin-I Hsieh

Published online: 1 January 1975

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.1.07hsi

Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Order by:

Liu, Chin-Ting

2024. Revisiting the nature and the context of T4 alternations: insights from disyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic word/digit productions in Taiwan Mandarin. Phonetica 81:4 ► pp. 381 ff.

Chang, Claire H.C., Tzu-Hui Lin & Wen-Jui Kuo

2019. Does phonological rule of tone substitution modulate mismatch negativity?. Journal of Neurolinguistics 51 ► pp. 63 ff.

Wee, Lian-Hee

2019. Phonological Tone,

Zhang, Jie & Jiang Liu

2016. The productivity of variable disyllabic tone sandhi in Tianjin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Zhang, Jie & Yuwen Lai

2010. Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology 27:1 ► pp. 153 ff.

Zhang, Jie

2007. A directional asymmetry in Chinese tone sandhi systems. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16:4 ► pp. 259 ff.

Zhang, Jie

2010. Issues in the Analysis of Chinese Tone. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:12 ► pp. 1137 ff.

Zhang, Jie

2014. Tones, Tonal Phonology, and Tone Sandhi. In The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ► pp. 443 ff.

Nessly, Larry

1977. On the bases of experimental phonology. Language in Society 6:2 ► pp. 221 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.