Nostratic
Sifting the Evidence
Editors
The “Nostratic” hypothesis — positing a common linguistic ancestor for a wide range of language families including Indo-European, Uralic, and Afro-Asiatic — has produced one of the most enduring and often intense controversies in linguistics. Overwhelmingly, though, both supporters of the hypothesis and those who reject it have not dealt directly with one another’s arguments. This volume brings together selected representatives of both sides, as well as a number of agnostic historical linguists, with the aim of examining the evidence for this particular hypothesis in the context of distant genetic relationships generally.
The volume contains discussion of variants of the Nostratic hypothesis (A. Bomhard; J. Greenberg; A. Manaster-Ramer, K. Baertsch, K. Adams, & P. Michalove), the mathematics of chance in determining the relationships posited for Nostratic (R. Oswalt; D. Ringe), and the evidence from particular branches posited in Nostratic (L. Campbell; C. Hodge; A. Vovin), with responses and additional discussion by E. Hamp, B. Vine, W. Baxter and B. Comrie.
The volume contains discussion of variants of the Nostratic hypothesis (A. Bomhard; J. Greenberg; A. Manaster-Ramer, K. Baertsch, K. Adams, & P. Michalove), the mathematics of chance in determining the relationships posited for Nostratic (R. Oswalt; D. Ringe), and the evidence from particular branches posited in Nostratic (L. Campbell; C. Hodge; A. Vovin), with responses and additional discussion by E. Hamp, B. Vine, W. Baxter and B. Comrie.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 142] 1998. vi, 293 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 24 October 2011
Published online on 24 October 2011
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
IntroductionJoseph C. Salmons and Brian D. Joseph | p. 1
-
I. The Nature and Status of Nostratic
-
Some Draft Principles for ClassificationEric P. Hamp | p. 13
-
Nostratic, Eurasiatic, and Indo-EuropeanAllan R. Bomhard | p. 17
-
The Convergence of Eurasiatic and NostraticJoseph H. Greenberg | p. 51
-
Exploring the Nostratic HypothesisAlexis Manaster-Ramer, Peter A. Michalove, Karen S. Baertsch and Karen L. Adams | p. 61
-
Indo-European and Nostratic: Some further commentsBrent Vine | p. 85
-
Nostratic: A personal assessmentLyle Campbell | p. 107
-
II. The Mathematics of Nostratic
-
A Probabilistic Evaluation of Indo-UralicDon Ringe | p. 153
-
A Probabilistic Evaluation of North Eurasiatic NostraticRobert L. Oswalt | p. 199
-
Response to Oswalt and RingeWilliam H. Baxter | p. 217
-
III. Relationships within Nostratic
-
The Implications of Lislakh for NostraticCarleton T. Hodge | p. 237
-
Nostratic and AltaicAlexander Vovin | p. 257
-
Regular Sound Correspondences and Long-Distance Genetic ComparisonBernard Comrie | p. 271
-
Indices
-
Index of Subjects | p. 277
-
Index of Languages | p. 281
-
Index of Names | p. 287
“Greenberg's paper is a welcome programmatic introduction to this thinking on Nostratic and Eurasiatic [...] The papers, by Manaster-Ramer et al. Vine and Campbell, represent [...] the best of what current historical linguistics has to offer: philological depth, methodological and theoretical aophistication, and historical sensitivity. Each could be required reading for advanced courses in historical linguistics. [...] Campbell shows a depth and sophistication in his assessment of the Nostratic issue that is a model of scholarly research.”
Philip Baldi, Penn State University in Linguistics Vol 36-2000
“[I]t seemed high time to bring prominent proponents of the theory together with some of their most prominent critics, and to see whether some kind of consensus could be reached, if not on the Nostratic theory itself, then at least on criteria for a proper evaluation of its methods and claims. In doing this, this collection of papers is an innovative and welcome endeavor. [...] For any linguist wishing to find an introduction to the nature and problems of the Nostratic debate, this book, more than any single work, should serve as the point of entry.”
Stefan Georg, University of Leiden in Anthropological Linguistics Vol. 42, no. 3
“[A] good state of the art report of Nostratic Studies. [...] It helps the clarification of concepts. It proves that it is worthwhile to deal with.”
Gy. Décsy in Eurasian Studies Yearbook 72(2000)
“[A]n excellent snap-shot of the state of the art, and a very instructive one.”
Paul Sidwell, Australian National University
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Ceolin, Andrea, Cristina Guardiano, Giuseppe Longobardi, Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Luca Bortolussi & Andrea Sgarro
2021. At the boundaries of syntactic prehistory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824 
Dediu, Dan, Scott R. Moisik, W. A. Baetsen, Abel Marinus Bosman & Andrea L. Waters-Rist
2021. The vocal tract as a time machine: inferences about past speech and language from the anatomy of the speech organs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Bakker, Peter
2020. Distant genetic relations: is Basque related to Indo-European?. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130 ► pp. 563 ff.
Emlen, Nicholas Q. & Johannes Dellert
Hickey, Raymond
2020. Language Contact and Linguistic Research. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 1 ff.
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2020. Languages of the World,
Ceolin, Andrea
Kaplan, Judith R.H.
2018. The global lexicostatistical database: A total archive of linguistic prehistory. History of the Human Sciences 31:5 ► pp. 106 ff.
Epps, Patience & Katherine Bolaños
2017. Reconsidering the “Makú” Language Family of Northwest Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 83:3 ► pp. 467 ff.
Greller, Wolfgang, Michael P. Barnes, Peter Schrijver & Stephen J. Walton
2017. N. In Encyclopedia of the Languages of Europe, ► pp. 339 ff.
Jäger, Gerhard
2015. Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:41 ► pp. 12752 ff.
Dediu, Dan
2014. Language and biology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 686 ff.
Kockelman, Paul, Jack Sidnell & N. J. Enfield
2014. Interdisciplinary perspectives. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 599 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Linguistics
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General