Trubetzkoy's Orphan
Proceedings of the Montréal Roundtable on “Morphonology: contemporary responses” (Montréal, October 1994)
Editor
Collaborator
In putting ‘morphonology’ up for adoption as a chapitre particulier in 1929, Trubetzkoy started a debate regarding the boundary between phonology and morphology that has not ended yet. Essentially a record of a roundtable devoted to that boundary (Montréal, October 1994), Trubetzkoy’s Orphan is a full and fascinating picture of some very important contemporary attempts to define it. In addition to papers that focus on it, the volume also contains important papers on the closely related topics of ‘morphoprosody’ and the ‘lexicon’, views from ‘the floor’ and ‘the outside’, and edited transcripts of the discussions that took place at the Montréal Roundtable.
Intended both for practicising and future phonologists and morpho-logists, Trubetzkoy’s Orphan is a valuable record of a very important debate regarding one of the most central questions in phonology and morphology.
Intended both for practicising and future phonologists and morpho-logists, Trubetzkoy’s Orphan is a valuable record of a very important debate regarding one of the most central questions in phonology and morphology.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 144] 1996. xiv, 363 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. vii
-
List of Contributors | p. xiii
-
Editor's Foreword | pp. 1–2
-
De l'autonomie de la morphophonologie: Discours d'ouvertureÉtienne Tiffou | pp. 3–9
-
I. Allomorphy and Morphophonology
-
Allomorphy or Morphophonology?Paul Kiparsky | pp. 13–31
-
Where Does Allomorphy Begin? Comments on KiparskyK.P. Mohanan | pp. 32–42
-
On the Morphology/Phonology Boundary: Comments on KiparskyDouglas C. Walker | pp. 43–47
-
Reply to Mohanan and WalkerPaul Kiparsky | pp. 48–54
-
Discussion | pp. 55–63
-
II. Modularity, Morphonology, and Gradience
-
A Functionalist Semiotic Model of MorphonologyWolfgang U. Dressler | pp. 67–83
-
Form & Content in a Functionalist Semiotic Model of Morphonology: Comments on DresslerRichard D. Janda | pp. 84–96
-
On A Functionalist Semiotic Model of Morphonology: Comments on DresslerDouglas C. Walker | pp. 97–101
-
Reply to Janda and WalkerWolfgang U. Dressler | pp. 102–105
-
Discussion | pp. 106–115
-
III. Linguistics without Morphophonology
-
Quelques avantages d'une linguistique débarrassée de la morpho(pho)nologieAlan Ford and Rajendra Singh | pp. 119–139
-
Where Does Morphophonology Belong? Comments on Ford & SinghK.P. Mohanan | pp. 140–154
-
“Même après le débrouillement il peut rester de la brume”: Comments on Ford & SinghRichard D. Janda | pp. 155–165
-
Reply to Mohanan and JandaAlan Ford and Rajendra Singh | pp. 166–170
-
Discussion | pp. 171–186
-
IV. Morphoprosody
-
Morphoprosody: Some reflections on accent and morphologyBernhard Hurch | pp. 189–221
-
Another View of Prosody and Morphology: Comments on HurchG.L. Piggott | pp. 222–228
-
Reply to PiggottBernhard Hurch | pp. 229–231
-
Discussion | pp. 232–243
-
V. Productivity and the Lexicon
-
Productivity, Regularity and Fusion: How language use affects the lexiconJoan L. Bybee | pp. 247–269
-
Productivity, Derivational Morphology, and Atypical Populations: Comments on BybeeHeather Goad | pp. 270–279
-
A Reply to GoadJoan L. Bybee | pp. 280–283
-
Discussion | pp. 284–294
-
VI. Some Additional Contributions
-
Issues in Morphophonology: A view from the floorRichard Desrochers | pp. 297–317
-
On Morphophonology: A view from the outsideProbal Dasgupta | pp. 318–331
-
-
Index | pp. 359–363
“[...] a fairly comprehensive picture of the current state of views on morphophonology. The format of presentation [...] provides an entertaining and informative picture, with lots of examples and questions.”
John T. Jensen, University of Ottawa
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Biggar, Darryl R.
1998. Application of Competition Policy to the Electricity Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General