Cited by

Cited by 25 other publications

Anderson, Sarah E. & Michael J. Spivey
2009. The enactment of language: Decades of interactions between linguistic and motor processes. Language and Cognition 1:1  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Andrews, Mark, Stefan Frank & Gabriella Vigliocco
2014. Reconciling Embodied and Distributional Accounts of Meaning in Language. Topics in Cognitive Science 6:3  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Barker, Peter, Xiang Chen & Hanne Andersen
2002. Kuhn on Concepts and Categorization. In Thomas Kuhn,  pp. 212 ff. DOI logo
Borghi, Anna M., Arthur M. Glenberg & Michael P. Kaschak
2004. Putting words in perspective. Memory & Cognition 32:6  pp. 863 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xiang
2001. Perceptual Symbols and Taxonomy Comparison. Philosophy of Science 68:S3  pp. S200 ff. DOI logo
Fenici, Marco & Duilio Garofoli
2017. The biocultural emergence of mindreading: integrating cognitive archaeology and human development. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 1:2  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Glenberg, Arthur M., Tiana Gutierrez, Joel R. Levin, Sandra Japuntich & Michael P. Kaschak
2004. Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension.. Journal of Educational Psychology 96:3  pp. 424 ff. DOI logo
Kan, Irene P., Lawrence W. Barsalou, Karen Olseth Solomon, Jeris K. Minor & Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
2003. ROLE OF MENTAL IMAGERY IN A PROPERTY VERIFICATION TASK: FMRI EVIDENCE FOR PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20:3-6  pp. 525 ff. DOI logo
Kimmel, Michael
2004. Gestalt-Based Linguistics and the GABEK Method:What Cognitive Science Has to Say on ‘Space Logic’ in Everyday Thought. In Organising Knowledge,  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Lindblom, Jessica
2015. Embodiment and Social Interaction. In Embodied Social Cognition [Cognitive Systems Monographs, 26],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Loughlin, Sandra, Emily Grossnickle, Daniel Dinsmore & Patricia Alexander
2015. “Reading” Paintings: Evidence for Trans-Symbolic and Symbol-Specific Comprehension Processes. Cognition and Instruction 33:3  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Machery, Edouard
2006. Two Dogmas of Neo‐Empiricism. Philosophy Compass 1:4  pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Mateus, Geral & Jose Otero
2011. Memory content of scientific concepts in beginning university science students. Educational Psychology 31:6  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Moss, Helen E., Lorraine K. Tyler & Kirsten I. Taylor
2012. Conceptual structure. In The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics,  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
OSBECK, LISA M. & NANCY J. NERSESSIAN
2006. The Distribution of Representation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36:2  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Stephen K.
2006. Cognitive Architectures for Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist 41:2  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Stephen K.
2019. Modeling visuospatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition & Computation 19:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Setti, Annalisa, Nicoletta Caramelli & Anna M. Borghi
2009. Conceptual information about size of objects in nouns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21:7  pp. 1022 ff. DOI logo
Shea, Nicholas
2014. Using phenomenal concepts to explain away the intuition of contingency. Philosophical Psychology 27:4  pp. 553 ff. DOI logo
Spalding, Thomas L., James M. Stedman, Christina L. Gagné & Matthew Kostelecky
2019. Embodied and Humanistic Views of Cognition. In The Human Person,  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Storms, Gert & Edward J. Wisniewski
2005. Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination?. Memory & Cognition 33:5  pp. 852 ff. DOI logo
TURNER, STEPHEN
2012. Making the Tacit Explicit. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42:4  pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Waskan, Jonathan
2017. From Neural Circuitry to Mechanistic Model-Based Reasoning. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science,  pp. 671 ff. DOI logo
Zeimbekis, John
2023. Perceptual warrant and internal access. Philosophical Studies 180:1  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2002. Commentaries. Psychological Inquiry 13:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.