The “Broken” Plural Problem in Arabic and Comparative Semitic
Allomorphy and analogy in non-concatenative morphology
Author
The formal aspects of non-concatenative morphology have received considerable attention in recent years, but the diachronic dimensions of such systems have been little explored. The current work applies a modern methodological and theoretical framework to a classic problem in Arabic and Semitic historical linguistics: the highly allomorphic system of ‘stem-internal’ or ‘broken’ plurals. It shows that widely-accepted views regarding the historical development of this system are untenable and offers a new hypothesis.
The first chapter lays out a methodology for comparative-historical research in morphology. The next two chapters present an analysis of Arabic morphology based on contemporary formal linguistic approaches, and applies this analysis to the noun plural system. Chapter Four shows that neither semantic shift nor ablaut-type sound change account adequately for the data. The fifth chapter offers a systematic comparison of the plural systems of Semitic languages, incorporating much new research on the languages of South Arabia and Ethiopia. Chapter Six proposes a new reconstruction.
The first chapter lays out a methodology for comparative-historical research in morphology. The next two chapters present an analysis of Arabic morphology based on contemporary formal linguistic approaches, and applies this analysis to the noun plural system. Chapter Four shows that neither semantic shift nor ablaut-type sound change account adequately for the data. The fifth chapter offers a systematic comparison of the plural systems of Semitic languages, incorporating much new research on the languages of South Arabia and Ethiopia. Chapter Six proposes a new reconstruction.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 168] 1998. xii, 261 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Foreword | p. ix
-
Note on transcription/transliteration | p. x
-
Chapter I: Methodological Preliminaries | p. 1
-
Chapter II: Morphological Analisys of Arabic | p. 22
-
Chapter III: The Arabic Noun Plural System | p. 68
-
Chapter IV: Survey of Previous Scholarship | p. 117
-
Chapter V: The Comparative Semitic Evidence | p. 150
-
Chapter VI: Subclassification and Reconstruction | p. 204
-
-
General Index | p. 255
Cited by
Cited by 52 other publications
A. Haddad, Youssef
2008. Pseudometathesis in three Standard Arabic broken-plural templates. Word Structure 1:2 ► pp. 135 ff. 
ABDALLA, FAUZIA & MARTHA CRAGO
2008. Verb morphology deficits in Arabic-speaking children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 29:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Abdalla, Fauzia, Michael P. Robb & Tareq Al-Shatti
2010. Stuttering and lexical category in adult Arabic speakers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 24:1 ► pp. 70 ff.
ALBIRINI, ABDULKAFI
2015. Factors affecting the acquisition of plural morphology in Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Child Language 42:4 ► pp. 734 ff.
Albirini, Abdulkafi
2021. Arabic in North America. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 277 ff.
Albirini, Abdulkafi & Elabbas Benmamoun
2014. Concatenative and Nonconcatenative Plural Formation in L1, L2, and Heritage Speakers of Arabic. The Modern Language Journal 98:3 ► pp. 854 ff.
Albirini, Abdulkafi & Elabbas Benmamoun
2014. Concatenative and Nonconcatenative Plural Formation in L1, L2, and Heritage Speakers of Arabic. The Modern Language Journal 98:3 ► pp. 854 ff.
Aldholmi, Yahya & Anne Pycha
2023. Segmental contributions to word recognition in Arabic sentences. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:2 ► pp. 257 ff.
Alqarni, Muteb
2021. No Gender Polarity in Arabic Numeral Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 52:3 ► pp. 441 ff.
Alqudsi, Arwa, Nazlia Omar & Khalid Shaker
2014. Arabic machine translation: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 42:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
Alshammari, Wafi & Stuart Davis
2019. Diminutive and augmentative formation in northern Najdi/Ḥā’ili Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXI [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 8], ► pp. 51 ff.
Alshboul, Sabri, Sahail M. Asassfeh & Yousef Al Shaboul
2013. Default Diminutives: Evidence from Modern Standard Arabic. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4:1
Al Aghbari, Khalsa
2014. Vb infixed plurals in Jebbāli. Morphology 24:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
ATTIA, MOHAMMED, PAVEL PECINA, YOUNES SAMIH, KHALED SHAALAN & JOSEF VAN GENABITH
2016. Arabic spelling error detection and correction. Natural Language Engineering 22:5 ► pp. 751 ff.
Bat‐El, Outi
2011. Semitic Templates. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Benmamoun, Elabbas
2016. Verbal and nominal plurals and the syntaxmorphology interface. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVII [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 59 ff.
Benmamoun, Elabbas, Abdulkafi Albirini, Silvina Montrul & Eman Saadah
2014.
Arabic plurals and root and pattern morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Blanchete, Ilham, Mohammed Mourchid, Samir Mbarki & Abdelaziz Mouloudi
2019. Arabic Broken Plural Generation Using the Extracted Linguistic Conditions Based on Root and Pattern Approach in the NooJ Platform. In Formalizing Natural Languages with NooJ 2018 and Its Natural Language Processing Applications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 987], ► pp. 27 ff.
Boudelaa, Sami
2014. Is the Arabic Mental Lexicon Morpheme-Based or Stem-Based? Implications for Spoken and Written Word Recognition. In Handbook of Arabic Literacy [Literacy Studies, 9], ► pp. 31 ff.
Boudelaa, Sami & William D. Marslen-Wilson
2015. Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:8 ► pp. 955 ff.
Bounoua, Ahmed, Ahmed Zinedine, Mohammed El Mohajir & Mohamed El Hannach
2018. 2018 IEEE 5th International Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), ► pp. 238 ff.
Bulakh, Maria
2019. Omani Mehri: A New Grammar with Texts. Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 93. By Aaron D. Rubin. Leiden: Brill, 2018. Pp. xix + 872 + illustrations. €171.00 (cloth).. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 78:2 ► pp. 369 ff.
Bulakh, Maria & Leonid Kogan
2011. Arabic influences on Tigre: A preliminary evaluation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 74:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cavalli-Sforza, Violetta & Abdelhadi Soudi
2007. Arabic Computational Morphology: A Trade-off Between Multiple Operations and Multiple Stems. In Arabic Computational Morphology [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 38], ► pp. 89 ff.
Davis, Stuart
2017. Chapter 5. Some issues for an analysis of the templatic comparative in Arabic with a focus on the Egyptian dialect. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 129 ff.
Davis, Stuart
2019. Are there transfer effects in the Arabic comparative?. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXX [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 7], ► pp. 33 ff.
Davis, Stuart & Natsuko Tsujimura
2018. Arabic Nonconcatenative Morphology in Construction Morphology. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 315 ff.
Dawdy-Hesterberg, Lisa Garnand & Janet Breckenridge Pierrehumbert
2014. Learnability and generalisation of Arabic broken plural nouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:10 ► pp. 1268 ff.
Divjak, Dagmar, Petar Milin, Adnane Ez-zizi, Jarosław Józefowski & Christian Adam
2021. What is learned from exposure: an error-driven approach to productivity in language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Dror, Judith
2014. Adjectival Agreement in the Qurʾān. Bulletin d’études orientales :62 ► pp. 51 ff.
E. Watson, Janet C.
2021. Arabic Morphology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics, ► pp. 405 ff.
Watson, Janet C. E.
2007. Arabic morphology: diminutive verbs and diminutive nouns in San’ani Arabic. Morphology 16:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Farwaneh, Samira
2020. Non-sound’ verb Inflection in Arabic: Allomorphic variation and paradigmatic uniformity. Morphology 30:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Faust, Noam
2019. New reasons to root for the Semitic root from Mehri and Neo-Aramaic
. The Linguistic Review 36:3 ► pp. 575 ff.
Ferrando, Ignacio
2019. La alomorfía en el plural fracto árabe. Del <em>Kitāb</em> de Sībawayhi al árabe moderno. El caso del esquema singular <em>faʿal</em>. Al-Qanṭara 39:2 ► pp. 587 ff.
González Martínez, Alicia, Susana López Hervás, Doaa Samy, Carlos G. Arques & Antonio Moreno Sandoval
2013. Jabalín: A Comprehensive Computational Model of Modern Standard Arabic Verbal Morphology Based on Traditional Arabic Prosody. In Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 380], ► pp. 35 ff.
Grande, Francesco
2020. Per una descrizione del kalām al-ʿarab. Fonti, problemi e metodi. Quaderni di Studi Arabi 15:1-2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Grano, Thomas & Stuart Davis
2018. Universal markedness in gradable adjectives revisited. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Kihm, Alain
2006. Nonsegmental Concatenation: A Study of Classical Arabic Broken Plurals and Verbal Nouns. Morphology 16:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Kogan, Leonid
2020. The broken plural in Soqotri. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 83:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Milin, Petar, Emmanuel Keuleers & Dušica Đurđević
2011. Allomorphic responses in Serbian pseudo-nouns as a result of analogical learning. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 58:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Rubin, Aaron D.
2008. The Subgrouping of the Semitic Languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Karin Ryding & David Wilmsen
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics,
Souag, Lameen
2021. Pattern borrowing and hybridization in Mubi (East Chadic): The importance of congruence. Word Structure 14:2 ► pp. 246 ff.
Suchard, Benjamin D. & Jorik (F.J.) Groen
2021. (Northwest) Semitic sg. *CVCC-, pl. *CVCaC-ū-: Broken plural or regular reflex?. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 84:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
TAKAHASHI, Yona
2014. The Historical Development of Niphal Verbal Forms in Biblical Hebrew. Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan 56:2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Ussishkin, Adam
2005. A Fixed Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Templaticmorphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23:1 ► pp. 169 ff.
Ussishkin, Adam
2006. Semitic Morphology: Root-based or Word-based?. Morphology 16:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Ussishkin, Adam
2006. Affix-favored Contrast Inequity and Psycholinguistic Grounding for Non-concatenative Morphology. Morphology 16:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Heritage Languages around the World. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 11 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General