Part of
Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997Edited by Hubert Cuyckens and Britta E. Zawada
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 177] 2001
► pp. 241–
Edited by Hubert Cuyckens and Britta E. Zawada
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 177] 2001
► pp. 241–
The Embodied Approach to the Polysemy of the Spatial Preposition On
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Bocian, Edyta
2022. Związki frazeologiczne z komponentem przestrzennym "su" w ujęciu kognitywnym. Próba analizy na materiale języka włoskiego. Acta Neophilologica 2:XXIV ► pp. 25 ff. 
Falck, Marlene Johansson & Lacey Okonski
2022. Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (pims): A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Bridge Theory and Practice. Cognitive Semantics 8:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Jamrozik, Anja & Dedre Gentner
2015. Well‐Hidden Regularities: Abstract Uses of in and on Retain an Aspect of Their Spatial Meaning. Cognitive Science 39:8 ► pp. 1881 ff.
Pavlović, Tijana Vesić
2016. Conceptual Metaphors with the Source Domain of Insanity in English and Serbian. Romanian Journal of English Studies 13:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
PROOS, MARIANN
2020. Feeling your neighbour: an experimental approach to the polysemy oftundma‘to feel’ in Estonian. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 282 ff.
Robinson, Justyna A.
2014. Quantifying polysemy in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 87 ff.
SUMAN, LUHACH & TIWARI GARIMA
2020. EXPLORING POLYSEMY THROUGH PROTOTYPICAL THEORY FOR TEACHING LEGAL ENGLISH IN CONTRACTS. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 10:4 ► pp. 27 ff.
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans
2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.