Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Andersen, Henning
2017. Abduction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax,  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Blevins, Juliette
2019. Deconstructing markedness in sound change typology. In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
2021. The grammaticalisation ofneverin British English dialects: Quantifying syntactic and functional change. Journal of Linguistics 57:3  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Garachana Camarero, Mar & Malte Rosemeyer
2011. Rutinas léxicas en el cambio gramatical. El caso de las perífrasis deónticas e iterativas. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :6  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Hansen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard
2021. From case to topology. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74:2  pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Harder, Peter
2021. Review of Heltoft, Igartua, Joseph, Kragh & Schøsler (2019): Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change. Studies in honor of Henning Andersen. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 56:2  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Jakobsen, Lisbeth Falster & Lars Heltoft
2012. Paradigm formation: Changes of function and structure in German and Danish mood systems. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten
2022. Voilà , membre du paradigme des marqueurs discursifs. Langages N° 227:3  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten & Lene Schøsler
2021. Analyse constructionnelle et paradigmatique illustrée par le verbe voir. Langue française N° 209:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Jones, Byron M.
2022. Appropriateness versus Naturalness in the Jamaican Creole Bible Translation Project. The Bible Translator 73:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Kasstan, Jonathan R.
2013. Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh, Le remplacement de l'imparfait du subjonctif par le présent du subjonctif considéré dans une perspective de grammaticalisation. (Études Romanes, 60.) Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2010, 261 pp., 978 87 635 3131 3. . Journal of French Language Studies 23:3  pp. 456 ff. DOI logo
James McElvenny
2023. The Limits of Structuralism, DOI logo
McGillivray, Barbara
2020. Computational Methods for Semantic Analysis of Historical Texts. In Routledge International Handbook of Research Methods in Digital Humanities,  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Mijatović, Aleksandar
2021. "(In)distinct Languages": Revisiting the Dualism of Literal and Literary Meaning in Roman Jakobson and Donald Davidson. Slavia Meridionalis 21 DOI logo
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova
2014. Testing the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Nichols, Johanna
2019. Suppletion or illusion?. In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345],  pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Orzechowska, Paula
2019. Theoretical Approaches to Phonotactic Complexity of Polish. In Complexity in Polish Phonotactics [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Robar, Elizabeth
2022. Morphology and Markedness: On Verb Switching in Hebrew Poetry. Journal for Semitics 30:2 DOI logo
Romagno, Domenica
2020. An “epoch in Historical Linguistics and Indo-European scholarship”: in memoriam Romano Lazzeroni (1930–2020). Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:2  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Lene Schøsler
2021. L’analyse constructionnelle des structures à réduction du sujet. Langue française N° 209:1  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Takeuchi, Lone
2009. Zhuangziand the search for coherence inIse monogatari. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 72:2  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.