Hypercorrection or functionally-motivated language use?: Intrusive [h] in present-day English accents and <h>-insertion in medieval manuscripts

Häcker, Martina

doi:10.1075/cilt.252.09hac

Part of

New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics: Selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002
Edited by Christian Kay, Carole Hough and Irené Wotherspoon
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 252] 2004
► pp. 109–123

Intrusive [h] in present-day English accents and <h>-insertion in medieval manuscripts

Hypercorrection or functionally-motivated language use?

Martina Häcker | University of Konstanz

Published online: 24 June 2004

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.252.09hac

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Heitner, Reese M.

2024. Aitch: When a Letter Loses Its Phonetic ’ead but Gains an Orthographic Foothold. In Icons of the Alphabet, ► pp. 43 ff.

Heitner, Reese M.

2024. Another Book on the Alphabet?. In Icons of the Alphabet, ► pp. 3 ff.

Buchstaller, Isabelle

2020. (h) in Marshallese English. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:2 ► pp. 222 ff.

Schreier, Daniel

2019. /h/ insertion as a ‘camouflage archaism’?. Diachronica 36:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Schlüter, Julia

2009. Consonant or ‘Vowel’? A Diachronic Study of Initial ‹h› from Early Middle English to Nineteenth-Century English. In Phonological Weakness in English, ► pp. 168 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.