Part of
Headhood, Elements, Specification and Contrastivity: Phonological papers in honour of John AndersonEdited by Philip Carr, Jacques Durand and Colin J. Ewen
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 259] 2005
► pp. 77–97
Edited by Philip Carr, Jacques Durand and Colin J. Ewen
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 259] 2005
► pp. 77–97
Tense/Lax, the Vowel System of English and Phonological Theory
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Barrientos, Fernanda
2024. Out with the old, in with the new: contrasts involving new features with acoustically salient cues are more likely to be acquired than those that redeploy L1 features. Frontiers in Language Sciences 3 
Gardner, Matt Hunt & Rebecca V. Roeder
2022. Phonological mergers have systemic phonetic consequences:palm, trees, and the Low Back Merger Shift. Language Variation and Change 34:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Iosad, Pavel
2017. The phonologisation of redundancy: length and quality in Welsh vowels. Phonology 34:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Lodge, Ken
2007. Timing, segmental status and aspiration in icelandic. Transactions of the Philological Society 105:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Pöchtrager, Markus A.
2020. Tense? (Re)lax!. Acta Linguistica Academica 67:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Warren, Paul
2018. Quality and quantity in New Zealand English vowel contrasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48:3 ► pp. 305 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.