How a Phonological Theory of Headedness can Account for Strong vs . Weak Phonetic Alternants

Ritter, Nancy A.

doi:10.1075/cilt.259.16rit

Part of

Headhood, Elements, Specification and Contrastivity: Phonological papers in honour of John Anderson
Edited by Philip Carr, Jacques Durand and Colin J. Ewen
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 259] 2005
► pp. 277–312

How a Phonological Theory of Headedness can Account for Strong vs . Weak Phonetic Alternants

Nancy A. Ritter | University of Connecticut

Published online: 18 March 2005

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.259.16rit

Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

van der Hulst, Harry

2016. Monovalent ‘Features’ in Phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:2 ► pp. 83 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.