A Crosslinguistic Comparison of Buoys. Evidence from American, Norwegian, and Swedish Sign Language

Cited by 10 other publications

ASADA, Yuko

2019. Properties of Coordination in Japanese Sign Language. Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies 28:1 ► pp. 20 ff.

de Vos, Connie

2015. The Kata Kolok Pointing System: Morphemization and Syntactic Integration. Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1 ► pp. 150 ff.

Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth

2011. Cognitive foundations of topic-comment and foreground-background structures: Evidence from sign languages, cospeech gesture and homesign. Cognitive Linguistics 22:4

Gabarró-López, Sílvia

2019. Describing buoys from the perspective of discourse markers. Sign Language & Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 210 ff.

Hansen, Martje & Jens Hessmann

2015. Researching linguistic features of text genres in a DGS corpus. Sign Language & Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Mesch, Johanna & Lars Wallin

2015. Gloss annotations in the Swedish Sign Language Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 102 ff.

Napoli, Donna Jo & Casey Ferrara

2021. Correlations Between Handshape and Movement in Sign Languages. Cognitive Science 45:5

Nijen Twilhaar, Jan & Beppie van den Bogaerde

2016.  In Concise Lexicon for Sign Linguistics,

Slonimska, Anita, Asli Özyürek & Olga Capirci

2020. The role of iconicity and simultaneity for efficient communication: The case of Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognition 200 ► pp. 104246 ff.

Sáfár, Anna & Vadim Kimmelman

2015. Weak hand holds in two sign languages and two genres. Sign Language & Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 205 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.