This article investigates whether evolutionary accounts can offer new insights into the paradox of language change. Specifically, I will examine three recent influential accounts (Haspelmath 1999, Keller 1994, and Croft 2000). As they contain a broad spectrum of positions on the relations between language and biology, they can be divided into metaphorical, biologistic and generalized views. Cross-cutting these, two types of evolutionary accounts are distinguished, which I call adaptive and two-level views, respectively. I critically evaluate their potential to provide satisfactory explanations for various types of change, drawing on examples from Romance and Germanic. Finally, I propose a revised explanation scheme which brings together the two-level approaches with theoretical distinctions and explanatory factors that have been suggested in earlier non-evolutionary frameworks, so that a more comprehensive view of language change can be obtained.
2020. Fisiología y cognición - el cambio fonético y las teorías acerca del cambio lingüístico más recientes: el cambio [f]- > [h]- en castellano antiguo*. Revista de Filología Románica 37 ► pp. 81 ff.
Da Milano, Federica & Nicoletta Puddu
2016. Trees, Languages and Genes: A Historical Path. In Understanding Cultural Traits, ► pp. 341 ff.
Oesterreicher, Wulf
2015. Zum Status der romanistischen Linguistik – Gegen ihre ‚Verächter‘. In Historische Sprachwissenschaft als philologische Kulturwissenschaft, ► pp. 15 ff.
Bauer, Matthias, Joachim Knape, Peter Koch & Susanne Winkler
2010. Dimensionen der Ambiguität. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 40:2 ► pp. 7 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.