This paper studies the intensifying use of most, comparing it to the behaviour ofright, one of the most common Middle English intensifiers. Using evidence from the Helsinki Corpus, this investigation shows that both items modify the same type of adjectival heads, namely bounded subjective positive adjectives, which suggests that they are not prototypical boosters, but come close to maximisers. While most is first found in typically comparative structures, later extending to intensifying contexts, right first occurs in intensifying environments, but can spread to superlative structures due to its original bounded nature. Most succeeds right on the temporal axis, and while it is equivalent to right in some environments, evidence from honorifics suggests that it usually indicates an even higher degree of intensification.
2020. History of English as punctuated equilibria? A meta-analysis of the rate of linguistic change in Middle English. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 6:2
2008. On the history ofdownright. English Language and Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2019. Ofright heirs, right idiotsandbad data. The diachrony of the intensifying adjectiveright. Studia Neophilologica 91:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2021. Synthetic Intensification Devices in Old English. Journal of English Linguistics 49:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.