Lithuanian displays a variety of morphological phenomena which languageindependently pass as highly marked. This paper looks at one particularly intriguing feature, namely definiteness inflection in the guise of pleonastic morphology. The synchronic facts of modern standard Lithuanian are presented and assessed first. Their diachronic development from the earliest Lithuanian records to the present is surveyed. Variation on the non-standard level and the state-of-affairs in the Latvian dialect cluster are addressed too, in order to determine whether or not the dynamics of pleonastic morphology conform to the predictions by extant theories of morphological change. It is shown that, within the Lithuanian diasystem, pleonastic morphology proves remarkably resistant to reductive change. On the other hand, the attested variation in the dialects suggests that when changes affect the system they do not necessarily lead to a wholesale disintegration of the marked kind of inflection.
2022. Superlative Morphology from Syntax: SlavicNai‐/Naj‐ and Internal Definiteness Marking in Old Lithuanian. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Wandl, Florian
2022. Trapped morphology and the rise of the Slavic definite adjective inflection: a reexamination. Folia Linguistica 56:s43-s1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Asya Pereltsvaig
2015. The Tatar DP. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 60:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Majer, Marek
2015. Russiankotóryj, Czechkterý, Slovenekatę´ri: Vowel Variation in the Reflexes of Proto-Slavic *koterъ(jь)‘which (of the two)’. Scando-Slavica 61:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.