The head in compounding

Sergio Scalise | University of Bologna

Antonio Fábregas | University of Tromsø

This chapter deals with the notion of head inside compounds. We will first focus on the unproblematic cases which have led researchers to determine that compounds contain a head (Section 1). Then we will analyse more problematic cases, showing that some of the properties of heads (such as their position inside the word) are not completely understood (Section 2). Problematic cases of exocentricity or multiple headedness inside compounds will be considered in Section 3, while Section 4 briefly explores the possibility that compounds contain more than one head. The main conclusion of this paper is that there are empirical grounds to propose the existence of heads inside compounds, but the determination of their properties and the identification of the units that play this role for a given feature require detailed language-particular and typological research yet to be done, although some generalizations can already be made.

Published online: 28 April 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.10sca

Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib

2016. Headedness in Arabic Compounds within the Synthetic Genitive Construction. SAGE Open 6:4 ► pp. 215824401667451 ff.

Altakhaineh, Abdel Rahman Mitib

2019. A cross-linguistic perspective on the Right-Hand Head Rule: the rule and the exceptions. Linguistics Vanguard 5:1

Andrea, Guasparri

2017. Greek ὁλοθούριον (the sea cucumber). Glotta 93:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Appah, Clement K. I.

2017. Exocentric compounds in Akan. Word Structure 10:2 ► pp. 139 ff.

Arcara, Giorgio, Carlo Semenza & Valentina Bambini

2014. Word structure and decomposition effects in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31:1-2 ► pp. 184 ff.

Arnaud, Pierre J.L. & Vincent Renner

2014. English and French [NN]N lexical units: A categorial, morphological and semantic comparison. Word Structure 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Bauer, Laurie

2016. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229], ► pp. 461 ff.

Cetnarowska, Bozena

2016. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 243 ff.

Clouet, Elizaveta, Rima Harastani, Béatrice Daille & Emmanuel Morin

2015. Compositional translation of single-word complex terms using multilingual splitting. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 21:2 ► pp. 263 ff.

Cuna, Andrea & Gabriele Angeli

2020. Improving the effectiveness of subject facets in library catalogs and beyond: a MARC-based semiautomated approach. Library Hi Tech ahead-of-print:ahead-of-print

Dolatian, Hossep

2021. The role of heads and cyclicity in bracketing paradoxes in Armenian compounds. Morphology 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L. Spalding, Patricia Spicer, Dixie Wong, Beatriz Rubio & Karen Perez Cruz

2020. Is buttercup a kind of cup? Hyponymy and semantic transparency in compound words. Journal of Memory and Language 113 ► pp. 104110 ff.

Koliopoulou, Maria

2015. Possessive / bahuvrīhi compounds in German. Languages in Contrast 15:1 ► pp. 81 ff.

Ralli, Angela

2013. In Compounding in Modern Greek [Studies in Morphology, 2], ► pp. 99 ff.

Renner, Vincent

2019. French and English lexical blends in contrast. Languages in Contrast 19:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

TOKIZAKI, HISAO

2016. PROMINENCE AND STRUCTURE OF COMPOUNDS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:1 ► pp. 119 ff.

Zibin, Aseel & Abdel Rahman Mitib Salim Altakhaineh

2018. An analysis of Arabic metaphorical and/or metonymical compounds. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 100 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.