The acoustic consequences of gestural overlap afford listeners multiple, time-varying cues for a given linguistic percept. Findings from “offline” perceptual tasks and “online” real-time processing converge in demonstrating that listeners attend to the dynamic cues, tracking the coarticulatory information over time. These findings also converge in showing that listeners systematically differ in their perceptual weighting of the information contributed by the coarticulatory source and its effects; that is, listener attention is selective. One factor contributing to these listener differences in perception grammars may be listener-specific experiences with particular coarticulatory patterns. However, another factor is the quasi-systematic nature of coarticulatory variation, which provides listeners with covarying cues and therefore multiple possible weightings that are fully consistent with the input. Of particular interest for sound change are “innovative” listeners, for whom the coarticulatory cues are heavily weighted. These listeners’ perception grammars have the potential to contribute to changes in which the coarticulatory effect is requisite and its source may be lost – but only insofar as those grammars are publicly manifested. Such manifestation is likely to occur in conversational interactions either through innovative listeners’ expectations about coarticulated speech or through those listeners’ own productions.
2022. Individual differences in phonetic imitation and their role in sound change. Phonetica 79:5 ► pp. 425 ff.
Bongiovanni, Silvina
2021. On covariation between nasal consonant weakening and anticipatory vowel nasalization: Evidence from a Caribbean and a non-Caribbean dialect of Spanish. Laboratory Phonology 12:1
Byun, Hi-Gyung
2020. Perceptual cues for /o/ and /u/ in Seoul Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 12:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
Pinget, Anne-France, René Kager & Hans Van de Velde
2020. Linking Variation in Perception and Production in Sound Change: Evidence from Dutch Obstruent Devoicing. Language and Speech 63:3 ► pp. 660 ff.
Zhang, Jingfen
2020. Literature Review. In Tono-types and Tone Evolution [Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, 11], ► pp. 15 ff.
2019. C. Elizabeth Goodin-Mayeda: Nasals and nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 241 ff.
Harrington, Jonathan, Felicitas Kleber & Mary Stevens
2016. The Relationship Between the (Mis)-Parsing of Coarticulation in Perception and Sound Change: Evidence from Dissimilation and Language Acquisition. In Recent Advances in Nonlinear Speech Processing [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 48], ► pp. 15 ff.
Ou, Jinghua & Sam-Po Law
2016. Individual differences in processing pitch contour and rise time in adults: A behavioral and electrophysiological study of Cantonese tone merging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139:6 ► pp. 3226 ff.
Stevens, Mary & Jonathan Harrington
2014. The individual and the actuation of sound change. Loquens 1:1 ► pp. e003 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.