• Forthcoming titles
      • New in paperback
      • New titles by subject
      • August 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • New serials
      • Latest issues
      • Currently in production
      • Active series
      • Other series
      • Open-access books
      • Text books & Course books
      • Dictionaries & Reference
      • By JB editor
      • Active serials
      • Other
      • By JB editor
      • Printed catalogs
      • E-book collections
      • Amsterdam (Main office)
      • Philadelphia (North American office)
      • General
      • US, Canada & Mexico
      • E-books
      • Examination & Desk Copies
      • General information
      • Access to the electronic edition
      • Special offers
      • Terms of Use
      • E-newsletter
      • Book Gazette
Article published in:
English Historical Linguistics 2008: Selected papers from the fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich, 24-30 August 2008. Volume II: Words, texts and genres
Edited by Hans Sauer and Gaby Waxenberger
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 324] 2012
► pp. 1–20

Etymology and the OED

The uses of etymology in a historical dictionary

Philip Durkin | The Oxford English Dictionary
Etymology and historical dictionaries have a symbiotic role: etymology has a key structural role in a historical dictionary, and the data of historical dictionaries is crucial for making advances in the study of etymology. This chapter draws illustrative examples from the new edition of the OED currently in course of publication. The ‘words’ documented by historical dictionaries are often highly complex entities, showing considerable variation in form and meaning, and that variation is typically both diachronic and diatopic, as illustrated by the dictionary entry for poke ‘sack’. It is not always safe to assume historical continuity as opposed to polygenesis in a word history; this sometimes involves assumed relationships of cognacy, as illustrated by freedom. Even when words are monomorphemic, borrowing among cognates often cannot be ruled out, e.g. rash. Two phenomena that historical dictionary structures bring into sharp relief are what can be termed historical splits (e.g. ordnance, ordinance) and mergers (e.g. melt) in word histories; cases of partial or near mergers are particularly problematic (e.g. mean, mystery). Sometimes merger can be hypothesized to explain a problematic history (e.g. queer). In the final part of the chapter the power of explanations based on form change and on meaning change are contrasted: in spite of considerable theoretical advances in the latter area, the unpredictability and isolated nature of most cases of semantic change remains a considerable challenge for etymological research, even in the context of the rich semantic documentation of a historical dictionary.
Published online: 09 August 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.324.01dur
Share via FacebookShare via TwitterShare via LinkedInShare via WhatsApp
About us | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | | | | Antiquariathttps://benjamins.com