Cover not available
Part of
Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 289–302

Root transparency and the morphology-meaning interface

Data from Hebrew

| Levinsky College of Education, Tel Aviv

The paper concerns the structural factor of ‘root transparency’ in relation to the morphology-meaning interface in the mental lexicon of Hebrew. Semitic root structure was analyzed by comparing responses of native speakers of Hebrew on a set of written tasks. Target items included both nouns derived from transparent full triconsonantal roots (e.g. migdal “tower” from the root g-d-l) and nouns derived from more opaque defective biconsonantal roots (e.g. taxazit “forecast” from the root x-z-y). Responses to items based on full roots demonstrated that they were across-the-board more accessible and easier to process than their defective counterparts. Moreover, the difference between performance on items derived from full compared with defective roots was found to interface with phonology, semantics, and syntax, as well as with familiarity/frequency. These results indicate that root transparency plays an important and pervasive role in the mental lexicon of Hebrew.

Published online: 27 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.20ser
References
Anderson, Stephan R
1982 “Where’s Morphology?”. Linguistic Inquiry 13.571–612.Google Scholar
Anglin, Jeremy M
1993 “Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis”. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 58:10.1–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994 Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Ilan, Laly & Ruth A. Berman
2007 “Developing Register Differentiation: The Latinate-Germanic Divide in English”. Linguistics 45.1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A
1978 Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
2000 “Children’s Innovative Verbs vs Nouns: Structured Elicitations and Spontaneous Coinages”. Methods in Studying Language Production ed. by Lise Menn & Nan Bernstein-Ratner, 69–93. Mahhwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2003 “Children’s Lexical Innovations: Developmental Perspectives on Hebrew Verb-Structure.” Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology ed. by Joseph Shimron, 243–291. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Batia Seroussi
2011 “Derived Nouns in Modern Hebrew: Structural and Psycholinguistic Perspectives”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 23.105–125.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Brian
1983 “Lexical Representation”. Language Production, vol. 2: Development, Writing, and Other Language Processes ed. by Brian Butterworth, 257–294. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L
1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaffin, Roger
1997 “Associations to Unfamiliar Words: Learning the Meanings of New Words”. Memory and Cognition 25.203–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaffin, Roger, Robin K. Morris & Rachel E. Seely
2001 “Learning New Meanings from Context: A Study of Eye Movements”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27.225–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chialant, Doriana & Alfonso Caramazza
1995 “Where is Morphology and how is it Processed? The Case of Written Word Recognition”. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing ed. by Laurie B. Feldman, 55–76. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970 “Remarks on Nominalization”. Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum, 184–221. Ginn, Mass.: Waltham.Google Scholar
Clark, James M. & Allan Paivio
2004 “Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) Norms”. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36.371–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corson, David
1995 Using English words. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Deyne, Simon & Gert Storms
2008 “Word Associations: Network and Semantic Properties”. Behavior Research Methods 40.213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durso, Francis T. & Wendelyn J. Shore
1991 “Partial Knowledge of Word Meanings”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120.190–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ram, Kenneth I. Forster & Avital Deutsch
1997 “What can we Learn from the Morphology of Hebrew? A Masked-Priming Investigation of Morphological Representation”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23.829–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gesenius = Emil Kautzch
ed. 1910 Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar. 2nd English ed. revised by A.E. Cowley. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gonnerman, Laura M., Mark S. Seidenberg & Elaine S. Andersen
2007 “Graded Semantic and Phonological Similarity Effects in Priming: Evidence for a Distribute Connectionist Approach to Morphology”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136.323–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer B. & Harald R. Baayen
2002 “Parsing and Productivity”. Yearbook of Morphology 2001 ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle, 203–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kielar, Aneta & Marc F. Joanisse
2011 “The Role of Semantic and Phonological Factors in Word Recognition: An ERP Study”. Neuropsychologia 49.161–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William, Lorrain K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older
1994 “Morphology and Meaning in the English Mental Lexicon”. Psychological Review 101.3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H
1991 Morphology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J
1981 “A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology”. Linguistic Inquiry 12.373–418.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L. & David E. Rumelhart
1985 “Distributed Memory and the Representation of General and Specific Information”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114.159–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Dougla L. & Cathy L. Mc Evoy & Simon Dennis
2000 “What is Free Association and what does it Measure?”. Memory & Cognition 28.887–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolaidis, Elena & Johanne Paradis
2012 “Acquiring Regular and Irregular Past Tense Morphemes in English and French: Evidence from Bilingual Children”. Language Learning 62.170–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Michael T. Ullman
2002 “The Past Tense Debate: The Past and Future of the Past Tense”. Trends in Cognitive Science 6.456–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, Kim & Virginia Marchman
1996 “Learning from a Connectionist Model of the Acquisition of the English Past Tense”. Cognition 62.299–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prunet, Jean-François
2006 “External Evidence and the Semitic Root”. Morphology 16.41–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit
2003 “A Developmental Perspective on Root Perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic”. Language Processing and Acquisition in Languages of Semitic, Root-Based, Morphology ed. by Joseph Shimron, 293–319. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid Diskin, Dorit
2012 Spelling Morphology: The Psycholinguistics of Hebrew Spelling. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Avraham Avidor
1998 “Acquisition of Derived Nominals in Hebrew: Developmental and Linguistic Principles”. Journal of Child Language 25.229–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiff, Rachel, Michal Raveh & Shany Kahta
2008 “The Developing Mental Lexicon: Evidence from Morphological Priming of Irregular Hebrew Forms”. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 21.719–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreuder, Robert & Harald R. Baayen
1995 “Modeling Morphological Processing”. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing ed. by Laurie B. Feldman, 131–154. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), Ora
2002 Studies in Hebrew Morphology. Tel Aviv: The Open University. [in Hebrew]Google Scholar
2003 “Opacity in Hebrew Word Morphology”. Language Processing and Language Acquisition in a Root-Based Morphology ed. by Joseph Shimron, 147–163. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seroussi, Batia
2002 Derived Nominals and their Appearance in the Mental Lexicon in a Developmental Perspective. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew]Google Scholar
2011 The Morphology-Semantics Interface in the Mental Lexicon: The case of Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
Shimron, Joseph
2003 “Semitic Languages: Are they Really Root-Based?”. Language Processing and Language Acquisition in a Root-Based Morphology ed. by Joseph Shimron, 1–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, Marcus
1988 “A Morphological-Decomposition Model of Lexical Presentation”. Linguistics 26.657–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velan, Hadas, Ram Frost, Avital Deutsch & David C. Plaut
2005 “The Processing of Root Morphemes in Hebrew: Contrasting Localist and Distributed Accounts”. Language and Cognitive Processes 20.169–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Berman, Ruth A.
2016. Typology, acquisition, and development. In Acquisition and Development of Hebrew [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 19], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
2018. From Pre-Grammaticality to Proficiency in L1: Acquiring and Developing Infinitival Usage in Hebrew. Psychology of Language and Communication 22:1 ► pp. 557 ff. DOI logo
Bolozky, Shmuel & Ruth A. Berman
2020. Chapter 9. Parts of speech categories in the lexicon of Modern Hebrew. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Ravid, Dorit, O. Ashkenazi, Ronit Levie, G. Ben-Zadok, T. Grunwald & Steven Gillis
2016. Foundations of the early root category. In Acquisition and Development of Hebrew [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 19], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Rodrigue-Schwarzwald, Ora
2022. Tracking a Morphological Pattern: miCCaC in Hebrew. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 685 ff. DOI logo
Schwarzwald, Ora R.
2020. Chapter 7. Inflection. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.