Coarticulation and Sound Change in Romance

| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027248480 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027270382 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
This volume should be of great interest to phoneticians, phonologists, and both historical and cognitive linguists. Using data from the Romance languages for the most part, the book explores the phonetic motivation of several sound changes, e.g., glide insertions and elisions, vowel and consonant insertions, elisions, assimilations and dissimilations. Within the framework of the DAC (degree of articulatory constraint) model of coarticulation, it clearly demonstrates that the typology and direction of these sound changes may very largely be accounted for by the coarticulatory effects occurring between adjacent or neighbouring phonetic segments, and by the degrees of articulatory constraint imposed by speakers on the production of vowels and consonants. The phonetically-based explanations presented here are formulated on the basis of coarticulation data from speech production and perception research carried out during the last fifty years and are complemented with data on the co-occurrence of phonetic segments in lexical forms of the languages being considered. Attention is also paid to the role that positional and prosodic factors play in sound change implementation, as well as to the cognitive and peripheral strategies involved in segmental replacements, elisions and insertions.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 329]  2014.  xi, 207 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.329
Table of Contents
Preface and acknowledgments
v–vi
List of abbreviations
xi–xii
1. Introduction
1–18
2. Consonant-dependent processes involving target vocalic segments
19–104
3. Vowel-dependent processes
105–144
4. Consonant-dependent processes involving target consonants
145–172
5. General discussion
173–182
6. Conclusions and outlook
183–188
References
189–202
Index of languages and dialects
203–204
Index of subjects and terms
205–207
“[A]n innovative and unique contribution to the field of historical Romance phonetics/phonology. [...] Recasens has done anyone researching phonetics/phonolgy and/or historical linguistics a great service by authoring this book.”
“Au total, le volume représente une contribution utile à notre discipline en insistant sur l’importance de revenir aux détails de la parole pour mieux comprendre les origines des changements phonétiques. Les informations expérimentales que l’auteur présente et la façon dont elles sont exploitées ouvriront de nouvelles perspectives pour le chercheur en phonétique diachronique.”
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Tahere Ahmadi, Hossein Karshenas, Bagher Babaali & Batool Alinejad
2020. Allophone-based acoustic modeling for Persian phoneme recognition. Signal and Data Processing 17:3 ► pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Bybee, Joan
2017. Grammatical and lexical factors in sound change: A usage-based approach. Language Variation and Change 29:3 ► pp. 273 ff. Crossref logo
Davidson, Justin
2020.  In Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 28], ► pp. 383 ff. Crossref logo
Hinskens, Frans
2020.  In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Huszthy, Bálint
2021. Italian preconsonantal s-voicing is not regressive voice assimilation. The Linguistic Review 38:1 ► pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Noiray, Aude, Anisia Popescu, Helene Killmer, Elina Rubertus, Stella Krüger & Lisa Hintermeier
2019. Spoken Language Development and the Challenge of Skill Integration. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Recasens, Daniel
2016. Stressed vowel assimilation to palatal consonants in early Romance. Journal of Historical Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo
Recasens, Daniel
2017. Georges Millardet, Études de dialectologie landaise. Le développement des phonemes additionnels, Toulouse, Édouard Privat, 1910, 224 Pages. Phonetica 74:4 ► pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Sampson, Rodney
2018. Why mâle? A Problematic Sound Change in French. Romance Philology 72:2 ► pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Solon, Megan
2018.  In Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 15], ► pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Albano, Eleonora C.
1999 “A gestural solution for some glide epenthesis problems”. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences ed. by John J. Ohala, Yoko Hasegawa, Manjari Ohala, Daniel Granville & Ashlee C. Bailey, 1785–1788. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Alcover, Antoni M. & Francesc de B. Moll
1929-1933 “La flexió verbal en els dialectes catalans”. Anuari de l’Oficina Romànica de Lingüística i Literatura 2.1–112, 3.73–96, 4.9–104, and 5.9–64.Google Scholar
1968-1975  Diccionari català-valencià-balear . Palma de Mallorca: Editorial Moll.Google Scholar
Alonso, Amado
1976  Estudios lingüísticos. Temas hispanoamericanos . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Alonso, Dámaso
1962 “Temas y problemas de la fragmentación fonética peninsular”. Enciclopedia lingüística hispánica , vol. 1, Supplement, 85–103. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Alvar, Manuel
1953  El dialecto aragonés . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning
1972 “Diphthongization”. Language 48.11–50.Google Scholar
1988 “Center and periphery: Adoption, diffusion, and spread”. Historical Dialectology: Regional and social ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, James M.
1965 “A study of syncope in Vulgar Latin”. Word 21.70–85.
Arnal, María Luisa
1991  El habla de la Baja Ribagorza Occidental . Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico, Diputación de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Badia, Antoni M.
1951  Gramática histórica catalana . Barcelona: Noguer.Google Scholar
Baruch, Kalmí
1930 “El judeoespañol de Bosnia”. Revista de Filología Española 17. 113–154.Google Scholar
Bec, Pierre
1968  Les interférences linguistiques entre gascon et languedocien dans les parlers du Comminges et du Couserans . Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Beddor, Patrice S.
1983  Phonological and Phonetic Effects of Nasalization on Vowel Height . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bell-Berti, Fredericka
1993 “Understanding velic motor control: Studies of segmental context”. Phonetics and Phonology: Nasals, nasalization, and the velum ed. by Marie K. Hufman & Rena A. Krakow, 63–85. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bell Berti, Fredericka & Katherine S. Harris.
1981 “A temporal model of speech production”. Phonetica 38.9–20.Google Scholar
Benguerel, André-Pierre & Helen A. Cowan
1974 “Coarticulation of upper lip protrusion in French”. Phonetica 30.41–55.Google Scholar
Bladon, R. Anthony & Ameen Al-Bamerni.
1976 “Coarticulation resistance in English /l/”. Journal of Phonetics 4.137–150.Google Scholar
Bladon, R. Anthony
and Francis J. Nolan. 1977 “A videofluorographic invstugation of tip and blade”. Journal of Phonetics 5.185–193.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
1984  Storia linguistica della Sardegna . Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1986  La lingua sarda contemporanea . Cagliari: Edizioni della Torre.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2004  Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, Roberto
1998  The Phonology of Campidanese Sardinian . Dordrecht: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bonneau, Anne, L. Djezzar & Yves Laprie.
1996 “Perception of the place of articulation of French stop bursts”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100.555–564.Google Scholar
Bouvier, Jean-Claude
1976  Les parlers provençaux de la Drôme . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Branda o de Carvalho, Joaquim.
1989 “L’origine de la terminaison - a o du portugais: une approche phonétique nouvelle du problème”. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 105.148–160.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein.
1989 “Articulatory gestures as phonological units”. Phonology 6.201–251.Google Scholar
1991 “Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes and historical change”. Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception ed. by Ignatius G. Mattingly & Michael Studdert-Kennedy, 313–338. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 “Targetless schwa: An articulatory analysis”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody ed. by Gerry J. Docherty & Robert Ladd, 26–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Charles
1913  Étude phonétique des patois d’Ardenne . Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Buesa Oliver, Tomás
1957 “Soluciones antihiáticas en el alto aragonés de Ayerbe”. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa 10/11.23–55.
Byrd, Dani
1994 “Articulatory timing in English consonant sequences”. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 86.1–186.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair
1959  Old English Grammar . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camproux, Charles
1962  Essai de géographie linguistique du Gévaudan . Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Carton, Fernand
1972 “Un cas d’extension de la palatalisation dans les patois du nord de la France”. Les dialects de la France au Moyen Âge et aujourd’hui ed. by Georges Straka, 449–460. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Casado Lobato, María Concepción
1948  El habla de la Cabrera Alta . Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Catalán, Diego
1971 “En torno a la estructura silábica dels español de ayer y del español de mañana”. Sprache und Geschichte:Festschrift für Harry Meier , 77–110. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Catford, John C.
1988  A Practical Introduction to Phonetics . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Celata, Chiara, Silvia Calamai, Irene Ricci & Chiara Bertini.
2013 “Nasal place assimilation between phonetics and phonology: An EPG study of Italian nasal-to-velar clusters”. Journal of Phonetics 41.86–100.Google Scholar
Chafcouloff, Michel & Alain Marchal.
1999 “Velopharyngeal coarticulation”. Coarticulation ed. by William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett, 69–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Steve S., Madeleine C. Plauché & John J. Ohala.
2001 “Markedness and consonant confusion asymmetries”. The Role of Speech Perception and Phonology ed. by Elizabeth V. Hume & Keith Johnson, 79–102. San Diego and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clivio, Gianrenzo. P.
1971 “Vocalic prosthesis, schwa-deletion and morphophonemics in Piedmontese”. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 87.334–344.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Alexei Kochetov.
2010 “Palatal nasals or nasal palatalization?”. Paper presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 40, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, March 26–28.
Colomina, Jordi
1985  L’alacantí:un estudi sobre la variació lingüística . Alacant: Institut D’Estudis Juan Gil-Albert, Diputació d’Alacant.Google Scholar
Contini, Michel
1986 “Les phénomènes de sandhi dans le domaine sarde”. Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe ed. by Henning Andersen, 519–550. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987  Étude de géographie phonétique et de phonétique instrumentale du sarde . Turin: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Coromines, Joan
1974  Lleures i converses d’un filòleg . Barcelona: Club Editor.Google Scholar
1980-2001  Diccionari etimològic i complementari de la llengua catalana . Barcelona: Curial.Google Scholar
Corriente, Federico
1977  A Grammatical Sketch of the Spanish Arabic Dialect Bundle . Madrid: Instituto Híspano-Árabe de Cultura.Google Scholar
Coustenoble, Hélène N.
1945  La phonétique du provençal moderne en terre d’Arles . Hertford: Stephen Austin & Sons.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah
1991 “Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations”. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79.
Dauzat, Albert
1897  Phonétique historique du patois de Vinzelles (Puy-de-Dôme) . Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
1938 “Géographie phonétique de la Basse Auvergne”. Revue de Linguistique Romane 14.1–210.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre C., Alvin M. Liberman & Frank S.
Cooper 1955 “Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27.769–773.Google Scholar
Denton, Jeannette Marshall
2003 “Reconstructing the articulation of Early Germanic *r”. Diachronica 20.11–43.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Colette
1972  Les parlers comtois d’Oïl . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia J.
1978 “On the natural phonology of vowels”. Working Papers in Linguistics, Ohio State University 23.
Dorman, Michael F., Michael Studdert-Kennedy & Larry J. Raphael.
1977 “Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues”. Perception and Psychophysics 22.109–122.
Duraffour, Antonin
1932 “Phénomènes généraux d’évolution phonétique dans les dialectes franco-provençaux étudiés d’aprés le parler de Vaux (Ain)”. Revue de Linguistique Romane 8.1–280.Google Scholar
Ellis, Lucy & William J. Hardcastle.
2002 “Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: evidence from EPG and EMA data”. Journal of Phonetics 30.373–396.Google Scholar
Elwert, W. Theodor
1943  Die Mundart des Fassa-Tals . Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Engstrand, Oll
1991 “Articulatory coordination in selected VCV utterances. Acoustic articulatory considerations”. Working Papers, Lund University Linguistics Department 21.5–10.Google Scholar
Fagan, D.S.
1988 “Notes on diachronic nasalization in Portuguese”. Diachronica 5.141–157.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar
1960  Acoustic Theory of Speech Production . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Farnetani, Edd
1999 “Labial coarticulation”. Coarticulation ed. by William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett, 144–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farnetani, Edda & Daniel Recasens.
2010 “Coarticulation and connected speech processes”. The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences ed. by William J.Hardcastle, John Laver & Fiona E. Gibbon, 316–352. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Joseph A.
1960  El habla de Sisterna . Revista de Filología Española Supplement 74. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Fritz
1912  Studien zur Sprachgeographie der Gascogne . Halle: Druck von Ehrhardt Karras.Google Scholar
Fouché, Pierre
1927  Études de phonétique générale . Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Patricia A. Keating
1997 “Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106.3728–3740.Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A.
1981 “A relationship between coarticulation and compensatory shortening”. Phonetica 38.35–50.Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. & Lawrence Brancazio.
2000 “Coarticulatory resistance of American English consonants and its effects on transconsonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation”. Language and Speech 43.1–41.Google Scholar
Francescato, Giuseppe
1966  Dialettologia friulana . Udine: Societa Filologica Friulana.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu
1961 “Bilabial stop and nasal consonants: a motion picture study and its acoustical implications”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 4.233–247.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu & Julie B. Lovins.
1978 “Syllables as concatenative phonetic units”, Syllables and Segments ed. by Alan Bell & Joan B. Hooper, 107–120. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
García Martínez, Ginés
1986  El habla de Cartagena. Palabras y cosas . Murcia: Universidad de Murcia-Ayuntamiento de Cartagena.Google Scholar
Gardette, Pierre
1941  Géographie phonétique du Forez . Macon: Imprimerie Protat Frères.Google Scholar
Gardette, Pierr
1950-1976  Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Lyonnais . Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Gartner, Theodor
1910  Handbuch der rätoromanischen Sprache und Literatur . Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Giannelli, Luciano
1997 “Tuscany”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 297–302. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giannini, Antonella & Massimo Pettorino.
1982  The Emphatic Consonants in Arabic . Speech Laboratory Report, Istituto Universitario Orientale, Naples.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan
2003 “Articulatory correlates of ambisyllabicity in English glides and liquids”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Constraints on phonetic interpretation ed. by John Local, Richard Ogden & Ros Temple, 222–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan, A. Min Kang & Douglas H. Whalen.
2002 “MRI evidence for commonality in the post-oral articulations of English vowels and liquids”. Journal of Phonetics 30.357–372.Google Scholar
Gonçalves Viana, Aniceto Reis
1973 “Essai de phonétique et de phonologie de la langue portugaise, d’après le dialecte actuel de Lisbonne”. Estudos de fonética portuguesa , 83–152. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional, Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Gossen, Carl Theodo
1970  Grammaire de l’ancien picard . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Grammont, Mauric
1971  Traité de phonétique , 9th edition. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Grandgent, C.H.
1905  An Outline of the Phonology and Morphology of Old Provençal . Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles H.
1991  Introducción al latín vulgar . Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Grassi, Corrado, Alberto Sobrero & Tullio Telmon.
1997  Fondamenti di dialettologia Italiana . Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
Grenlee, Mel & John J. Ohala.
1980 “Phonetically motivated parallels between child phonology and historical sound change”. Language Sciences 2.283–308.Google Scholar
Grisch, Mena
1939 “Die Mundart von Surmeir”. Romanica Helvetica 12. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Grosvald, Michael
2009 “Interspeaker variation in the extent and perception of long-distance vowel-to-vowel coarticulation”. Journal of Phonetics 37.173–188.Google Scholar
Grosvald, Michael & David Corina.
2012a “The production and perception of sub-phonemic vowel contrasts and the role of the listener in sound change”. The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, production, and social factors ed. by Maria Josep Solé & Daniel Recasens, 77–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2012b “Perception of long-distance coarticulation: An event-related potential and behavioral study”. Applied Psycholinguistics 33.55–82.Google Scholar
Guarnerio, Pier Enea
1918  Fonologia romanza . Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G.
1996  Velar Palatalization, Coarticulation, Perception and Sound Change . Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
1998 “The role of perception in the sound change of velar palatalization”. Phonetica 55.18–52.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1988 “Rhaeto-Romance”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 351–390. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Paola Beninc .à.
1992  The Rhaeto-Romance Languages . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hajek, John
1991 “The hardening of nasalized glides in Bolognese”. Certamen Phonologicum II ed. by Pier Marco Bertinetto, Michael Kenstowicz & Michele Loporcaro, 259–278. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
1997a  Universals of Sound Change in Nasalization . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997b “Emilia-Romagna”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 271–278. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hajek, John & Shinji Maeda.
2000 “Investigating universals of sound change: The effect of vowel height and duration on the development of distinctive nasalization”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon ed. Michael B. Broe & Janet B. Pierrehumbert, 52–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. & Nigel Hewlett.
(eds.) 1999  Coarticulation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. & Peter J. Roach.
1979 “An instrumental investigation of coarticulation in stop consonant sequences”. Work in Progress, Phonetics Laboratory, University of Reading 1.27–44.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin
1988 “French”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 209–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris-Northall, Ray
1990  Weakening Processes in the History of Spanish Consonants . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hastings, Robert
1997 “Abruzzo and Molise”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 321–329. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herslund, Michael
1986 “Portuguese sandhi phenomena”. Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe ed. by Henning Andersen, 505–518. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honoroff, Douglas N.
1999  Articulatory Gestures and Spanish Nasal Assimilation , Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Hoole, Philip, Lasse Bombien, Marianne Pouplier, Christine Mooshammer & Barbara K.
#x00FC;hnert 2012  Consonant Clusters and Structural Complexity . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B.
1976  An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S.
1957 “Analog studies of nasal consonants”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 22.190–204.Google Scholar
Huber, Joseph
1986  Gramática do português antigo . Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian. Iliescu, Maria. 1972. Le frioulan à partir des dialectes parlés en Roumanie . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jaberg, Karl & Jakob Jud.
1928-1940  Sprach- und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz , 8 vols. Zofingen: Ringier.Google Scholar
Jeanjaquet, Jules E.
1931 “Les patois valaisans”. Revue de Linguistique Romane 7.23–51.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael
1988 “Sardinian”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 314–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho
1996 “Place assimilation is just the result of gestural overlap: Evidence from Korean and English”. Phonology 13.377–407.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A.
1988 “Palatals as complex segments: X-ray evidence”. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 69.77–91.Google Scholar
Keating, Patrice
1990 “The window model of coarticulation: Articulatory evidence”, Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech ed. by John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman, 451–470. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A.
1991 “Coronal places of articulation”. The Special Status of Coronals:Internal and external evidence ed. by Carole Paradis & Jean-François Prunet, 29–48. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Raymond D. & Kenneth L. Moll.
1972 “Cinefluorographic analyses of selected lingual consonants”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15.453–473.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2003 “The phonological basis of sound change”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 313–342. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei
2001  Production, Perception, and Emergent Phonotactic Patterns: A case of contrastive palatalization . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krakow, Rena A.
1999 “Physiological organization of syllables: A review”. Journal of Phonetics 22.23–54.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Gary
1975 “On the front cavity resonance and its possible role in speech perception”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 58.428–433.Google Scholar
Kühnert, Barbara & Philip Hoole.
2004 “Speaker-specific kinematic properties of alveolar reduction in English and German”. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 18.559–575.Google Scholar
La Chaussée, François de
1982  Initiation à la phonétique historique de l’ancien français . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson.
1996  The Sounds of the World’s Languages . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lafont, Robert
1983  Éléments de phonétique de l’occitan . Valderiès: Vent Terral.Google Scholar
Lanher, Jean, Alain Litaize & Jean Richard.
1979-1985  Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de la Lorraine Romaine . Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael
1980  Historia de la lengua española . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1980  On Explaining Language Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Phonology and morphology”. The Cambridge History of the English Language ed. by Norman Blake, vol. 2, 23–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich
1970  Lingüística románica . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Leite de Vasconcellos, José
1987  Esquisse d’une dialectologie portugaise . Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Investigaçao Científica.Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin, Pierre C., Delattre, Frank S. Cooper & Louis J. Gerstman.
1954 “The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants”. Psychological Monographs 68.1–13.Google Scholar
Lin, Susan S., Patrice S
, Beddor & Andries W. Coetzee. 2011 “Gestural reduction and sound change: An ultrasound study”. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , ed. by Wai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee, 1250–1253. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lindblad, Per & Sture Lindqvist.
2003 “[l] tends to be velarised, apical as opposed to laminal, and produced with a low jaw, and these features are connected”. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences ed. by Maria Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquín Romero, 1899–1902. Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn E.
1990 “Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H & Htheory.”. Speech Production and Speech Modelling ed. by William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John M.
1996  El español de América . Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Llorente Maldonado de Guevara, Antonio
1962 “Fonética y fonología andaluzas”. Revista de Filología Española 45.227–240.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul M.
1993  Del latín al español . Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
1997a “On vowel epenthesis in Alguer Catalan”. Certamen Phonologicum III ed. by Pier Marco Bertinetto, Livio Gaeta, Georgi Jetchev & David Michaels, 205–227. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
1997b Puglia and Salento. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 338–348. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 “Syllable, segment and prosody”. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages , ed. by Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway, vol.1, 50–108, 684–689. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loriot, Robert
1952 “Les caractères originaux du dialecte du Val Tujetsch (Tavetsch) dans la famille ds parlers sursilvains”. Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature romanes offerts à Mario Roques , vol. 3, 111–138. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Lubker, James
and Thomas Gay. 1982 “Anticipatory labial coarticulation: Experimental, biological, and linguistic variables”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71.437–448.Google Scholar
Lutta, Conrad Martin
1923 “Der Dialekt von Bergün und seine Stellung innerhalb der rätoromanischer Mundarten Graubündens”. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 71. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Luzi, Johann
1904 “Der sutselvischen Dialekte”. Romanische Forschungen 16.757–846.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
1995  A Linguistic History of Italian . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Major, Roy C.
1990 “Rhythmic typology and change in Brazilian Portuguese”. Folia Linguistica Historica 11.105–120.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1980 “The fluctuating intensity of a sound law”. Romance Philology 34.48–63.Google Scholar
1990 “Six categories of nasal epenthesis: Their place in the evolution from Latin into Romance”. Diachronic Problems in Phonosymbolism , vol. 1, 231–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mallison, Graham
1988 “Romanian”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 391–419. London & Sidney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil
1965 “Los grupos de consonantes en español”. Estudios de fonética hispánica , 29–49. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
1971. Phonétique générale et romane . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Manuel, Sharon
1990 “The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different language”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88.1286–1298.Google Scholar
Martin, James G. & H. Timothy Bunnell.
1982 “Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop-vowel sequences”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8.473–488.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Baptiste & Gaston Tuaillon.
1971-1978  Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Jura et des Alpes du Nord . Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Martins, Paula, Ines Carbone, Alda Pinto, Augusto Silva & António Teixeira.
2008 “European Portuguese MRI based speech poduction studies”. Speech Communication 50.925–952.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón
1968  Manual de gramática histórica española . Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm
1974  Grammaire des langues romanes , vol. 1. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar
Millardet, Georges
1910  Études de dialectologie landaise . Toulouse: Édouard Privat.Google Scholar
1925 “Études siciliennes”. Homenaje a Menéndez Pidal , vol. 1, 713–757. Madrid: Hernando.Google Scholar
1933 “Sur un ancien substrat commun à la Sicile, la Corse et la Sardaigne”. Revue de Linguistique Romane 9.346–369.Google Scholar
Molho, Maurice
1956-1957 “Acerca de la evolución del grupo -SKL- > -SL- en romance”. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa 8–9. 63–71.
Moll, Kennet L. & Raymond G. Daniloff.
1971 “Investigation of the timing of velar movements during speech”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50.678–684.Google Scholar
Mooshammer, Christine, Philip Hoole & Barbara K. ünhert.
1995 “On loops”. Journal of Phonetics 23.3–21.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves Charles
1976 “Phonological tensions in French”. Current Studies in Romance Linguistics ed. by Marta Luján & Fritz Hensey, 37–49. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2003 “Syncope, apocope, diphthongaison et palatalisation en gallo-roman: problèmes de chronologie relative”, Actas del XXIII Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románica ed. by Fernando Sánchez Miret, vol. 1, 113–1169. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2013 “From apical [r] to uvular [R]: What the apico-uvular r in Montreal French reveals about abrupt sound changes”. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change in Romance , ed. by Fernando Sánchez Miret & Daniel Recasens, 65–94. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Mowrey, Richard & William Pagliuca.
1985 “The reductive character of articulatory evolution”. Rivista di Linguistica 7.37–124.Google Scholar
Nandris, Oscar
1963  Phonétique historique du roumain . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Nauton, Pierre
1961  Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Massif Central . Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
1974  Géographie phonétique de la Haute-Loire . Paris: Société d’Édition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás
1917 “Sobre la articulación de la l castellana”. Estudis fonètics 1.265–267.Google Scholar
1972  Manual de pronunciación española . Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Niedermann, Max
1953  Précis de phonétique historique du latin . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1974 “Phonetic explanations in phonology”. Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology ed. by Anthony Bruck, Robert Allen Fox & Michael W. LaGaly, 251–274. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1975 “Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns”. Nasálfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization ed. by Charles A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman & John J. Ohala, 289–316. Stanford, Language Universals Project.Google Scholar
1978 “Southern Bantu vs. the world: The case of palatalization of labials”. Berkeley Linguistic Society 4.370–386.Google Scholar
1981 “The listener as a source of sound change”. Papers from the Parasession on Language Behavior ed. by Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick & Mary Frances Miller, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1983 “The phonological end justifies any means”. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists ed. by Shiro Hattori & Kazuko Inoue, 232–243. Tokyo.Google Scholar
1993 “Coarticulation and phonology”. Language and Speech 36.155–170.Google Scholar
1997 “Comparison of speech sounds: distance vs cost metrics”. Speech Production and Language ed. by Shigeru Kiritani, Hajime Hirose & Hiroya Fujisaki, 261–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Maria Grazia Busà.
1995 “Nasal loss before voiceless fricatives: A perceptually-based sound change”. Rivista di Linguistica 7.125–144.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & James Lorentz.
1978 “The story of [w : An exercise in the phonetic explanation for sound patterns”. Report of the Berkeley Phonology Laboratory 2.133–155.Google Scholar
Ohala, Manjari & John J. Ohala.
1991 “Epenthetis nasals in the historical phonology of Hindi”. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences , vol. 3, 126–129. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Solé, Maria Josep
2010 “Turbulence in phonology”. Turbulent Sounds. An interdisciplinary guide ed. by Susanne Fuchs, Martine Toda & Marzena Zygis, 37–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, Sven E.G.
1966 “Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39.151–168.Google Scholar
Öhman, Sven E. G.
1967 “Numerical model of coarticulation”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 41.310–328.Google Scholar
Operstein, Natalie
2010  Consonant Structure and Prevocalization . Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paiva Boléo, Manuel de & Maria Helena Santos Silva.
1961 “O “mapa dos dialectos e falares de Portugal continental”. Boletim de Filologia 20.85–112.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Stephen
1988 “Portuguese”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 131–169. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Parry, Mai
1997 “Piedmont”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 238–244. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph
1970  El habla pasiega: ensayo de dialectología montañesa . London: Tamesis Books Ltd.Google Scholar
2000  Variation and Change in Spanish . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pensado, Carmen
1984  Cronología relativa del castellano . Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
1985 “NU9 en gallego y portugués. Multiplicidad de tratamientos como consecuencia de la interacción de cambios fonéticos”. Verba 12.31–60.Google Scholar
1991 “Un reanálisis de la ‘l leonesa’”. Linguistic studies in Medieval Spanish ed. by Ray Harris-Northall & Thomas D. Cravens, 63–87. Madison: The Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Picard, Marc
1989 “Consonantal epenthesis as a regular sound change”. Diachronica 6.223–236. Poerck, Guy de 1962 “Le a tonique devant nasale dans les parlers rhéto-romans”. Vox Romanica 21.57–82.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred K.
1934  From Latin to Modern French with Special Consideration of Anglo-Norman . Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca
1997  Linguistic Change in French . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, Michael
2011 “Towards a gestural characterization of liquids: Evidence from Spanish and Russian”. Laboratory Phonology 2.451–485Google Scholar
Prokosch, E.
1939  A Comparative Germanic Grammar . Philadelphia: The Linguistic Society of America, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L.
1976 “Latin kw , g w > Rumanian p, b: An explanation”. Current Studies in Romance Linguistics ed. by Marta Luján & Fritz Hensey, 14–26. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Ranson, Diana L.
1999 “Variation in voicing in Spanish syncopated forms”. Essays in Hispanic Linguistics Dedicated to Paul M. Lloyd ed. by Robert Blake, Diana L. Ranson & Roger Wright, 125–154. Newark: Juan de la Cuesta.Google Scholar
Ravier, Xavier
1978-1994  Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Languedoc Occidental . Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel
1986  Estudis de fonètica experimental del català oriental central . Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
1996  Fonètica descriptiva del català: assaig de caracterització de la pronúncia del vocalisme i consonantisme del català al s. XX . Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
1999 “Lingual coarticulation”. Coarticulation ed. by William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett, 80–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006 “Integrating coarticulation, assimilation and blending into a model of articulatory constraints”. Laboratory Phonology 8:Varieties of phonological competence ed. by Louis M. Goldstein, Douglas H. Whalen & Catherine T. Best, 611–634. Berlin & New York.: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011 “Encara sobre l’evolució en català de les vocals posttòniques dels proparoxítons llatins”. Noves aproximacions a la fonologia i la morfologia del català. Volum d’homenatge a Max W. Wheeler ed. by Maria Rosa Lloret & Clàudia Pons, 521–542. València: Institut Interuniversitari de Filologia Valenciana.Google Scholar
2013 “Coarticulation in Catalan dark l and the alveolar trill: General implications for sound change”. Language and Speech 56.45–68.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Aina Espinosa.
2009 “Acoustics and perception of velar softening for unaspirated stops”. Journal of Phonetics 37.189–211.Google Scholar
2010a “Lingual kinematics and coarticulation for alveolopalatal and velar consonants in Catalan”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127.3154–3165.Google Scholar
2010b “The role of spectral and temporal cues in consonantal vocalization and glide insertion”. Phonetica 67.1–24.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Edda Farnetani.
1994 “Spatiotemporal properties of different allophones of /l/: Phonological implications”. Phonologica 1992 ed. by Wolfgang U. Dressler, Martin Prinzhorn & John R. Rennison, 195–204. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, Jordi Fontdevila & Maria Dolors.
Pallarès 1995 “A production and perceptual account of palatalization”. Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV: Phonology and phonetic evidence ed. by Bruce Connell & Amalia Arvaniti, 265–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Maria Dolors Pallarès.
1999 “A study of /Ρ/ and /r/ in the light of the ‘DAC’ coarticulation model”. Journal of Phonetics 27.143–170.Google Scholar
2001  De la fonètica a la fonologia. (Les consonants i assimilacions consonàntiques del català) . Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, Maria Dolors Pallarès & Jordi Fontdevila.
1997 “A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102.544–561.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Joaquín Romero.
1997 “An EMMA study of segmental complexity in alveolopalatal and palatalized alveolars”. Phonetica 54.43–58.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Karl J.
1970 “Intrusive [i9] before /S/ in Brazilian Portuguese”. Word 26.101–106.Google Scholar
Remacle, Louis
Atlas linguistique de la Wallonie, vol. 1 ( Introduction générale, aspects phonétiques ). Liège: Université de Liège.
Repetti, Lori & Edward F. Tuttle.
1987 “The evolution of Latin PL, Bl, and CL, GL in Western Romance”. Studi mediolatini e volgari 33.53–115.Google Scholar
Repp, Bruno H. & Katyanee Svastikula.
1988 “Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in VC syllables”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83.237–247.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Castellano, Lorenz
1952  La variedad dialectal del Alto Aller . Oviedo: Instituto de Estudios Asturianos.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Castellano, Lorenzo
1954  Aspectos del bable occidental . Oviedo: Instituto de Estudios Asturianos.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1966  Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti , Fonetica. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
1970  Le gascon. Études de philologie pyrénéenne . Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Romano, Antonio & Pierre Badin.
2009 “An MRI study of the articulatory properties of Italian consonants”. Estudios de Fonética Experimental 28.327–344.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter J. & Dave Miller.
1991 “Syllabic consonants at different speaking rates. A problem for automatic recognition”. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop Phonetics and Phonology of Speaking Styles , 45(1)-45(5). Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ronjat, Jules
1930-1941  Grammaire (h)istorique des parlers provençaux modernes . 4 vols. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.Google Scholar
Rostaing, Charles
1951 “Phénomènes de nasalisation en provençal”. Mélanges de linguistique offerts à Albert Dauzat par ses élèves et ses amis . Paris: Éditions d’Artrey.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre
1891 “L’S devant T, P, C dans les Alpes”. Études romans dédiées à Gaston Paris , 475–486. Paris: Emile Bouillon.Google Scholar
1924-1925  Principes de phonétique experimentale . 2 vols. Paris-Leipzig: Welter.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt
1978 “Nasal vowels”. Universals of Human Language ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, vol. 2, 202–241. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sala, Marius
1976  Contributions à la phonétique historique du roumain . Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
1997 “Ladin”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 286–294. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salvioni, Carlo
1901 “La risoluzione palatina di K e G nelle Alpi Lombardi”. Studj di Filologia Romanza 8. 1–34.Google Scholar
Sampson, Rodney
1999  Nasal Vowel Evolution in Romance . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010  Vowel Prosthesis in Romance . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanga, Glauco
1997 “Lombardy”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 253–262. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sánchez Miret, Fernando
1998  La diptongación en las lenguas románicas . München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2012 “La història de /-r/ en català: Perspectiva romànica”. La lingüística romànica al segle XXI: IV Jornada de l’Associació d’Amics del professor Antoni M. Badia i Margarit , 27–60. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
2013 “Aspectos fonéticos de la diptongación en rumano”. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change in Romance ed. by Fernando Sánchez Miret & Daniel Recasens, 175–222. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Schürr, Friedrich
1970 “La diphthongaison romane”. Revue de Linguistique Romane 39.296–307.Google Scholar
1971  Probleme und Prinzipien romanischer Sprachwissenschaft . Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. & Koen Sebregts.
2010 “Acoustic, articulatory and phonological perspectives on allophonic variation of /r/ in Dutch”. Interfaces in Linguistics: New research perspectives ed. by Raffella Folli & Christiane Ulbrich, 131–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Séguy, Jea
1954-1973  Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de la Gascogne . Toulouse-Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Séguy, Jean
1954 “À propos de la diphthongaison de È et Ò ouverts”. Annales du Midi 66.307–311.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria Josep
2002 “Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning”. Journal of Phonetics 30.655–688.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria Josep & Daniel Recasens.
2012  The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, production, and social factors . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna
1997 “Campania”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 330–337. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spore, Palle
1972  La diphthongaison romane . Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard & Osamu Fujimura.
1993 “Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation”. Journal of Phonetics 21.291–311.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N.
1998  Acoustic Phonetics . Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Straka, Georges
1959 “Durée et timbre vocaliques. Observations de phonétique générale appliquées à la phonétique historique des langues romanes”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 12.276–300.Google Scholar
1965 “Contribution à l’histoire de la consonne R en français”. Neuphilologische Mitteillungen 66.572–606.Google Scholar
1968 “Contribution à la description et à l’histoire des consonnes l ” . Travaux de linguistique et de littérature de l’Université de Strasbourg 6.267–325.Google Scholar
1979 “Remarques sûr les voyeless nasales, leur origine et leur évolution en français”. Les sons et les mots, 501–531. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Straka, Georges & Pierre Nauton.
1947 “Le polymorphisme de l’r dans la Haute-Loire”. Études Linguistiques 108, Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Strasbourg, 195–238.Google Scholar
Svenson, Lars Owe
1959  Les parlers du Marais Vendéen . Göteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao
1980  Grammatica storica dell’italiano . Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Tilsen, Sam
2013 “Inhibitory mechanisms in speech planning maintain and maximize contrast”. Origins of Sound Change ed. by Alan C.L. Yu, 112–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torreblanca, Máximo
1984 “El ensordecimiento de grupos consonánticos sonoros en español peninsular”. Hispanic Linguistics 1.35–40.Google Scholar
Trumper, Joh
1997 “Calabria and southern Basilicata”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 355–364. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuttle, Edward F.
1991 “Considerazione pluristratica sociale degli esiti di AU e AL+alveodentale nell’Italia settentrionale”. Actes du XVIII Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes , vol. 3, 571–582. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1993 “Closed communities and nasal enhancement in Northern Italy”. Linguistics Perspectives on the Romance Languages ed. by William J. Ashby,Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perisinotto & Eduardo Raposo, 139–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura
Friuli”. The Dialects of Italy ed. by Martin Maiden & Mair Parry, 279–285. London and New York: Routledge.
Vennemann, Theo
1972 “Phonetic detail in assimilation: Problems in Germanic phonology”. Language 48.863–892.Google Scholar
1988  Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change . Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Veny, Joan
1989 “L’equivalència acústica B=G en català: els casos de “bolerany” ‘remolí’ i “boixac” ‘galdiró’”. Estudis de Llengua i Literatura Catalanes , vol. 18, 101–127. Barcelona: Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Vihman, Marylin M.
1967 “Palatalization in Russian and Estonian”. Project on Linguistic Analysis Reports, Phonology Laboratory , Second Series, 1: V1–V32. University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1988 “Italian”. The Romance Languages ed. by Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent, 279–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Virdis, Maurizio
1978  Fonetica del dialetto sardo campidanese . Sassari: Edizione della Torre.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold
1925 “Los dialectos judeoespañoles de Karaferia, Kastoria y Brusa”. Homenaje a Ramón Menéndez Pidal , vol. 2, 193–203. Madrid: Hernando.Google Scholar
1930 “Caracteres generales del judeoespañol de Oriente”. Revista de Filología Española , Anejo 12. Madrid.Google Scholar
Wartburg, Walther von
1922–  Französisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch . Bonn & Leipzig: K. Schroeder; Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr; Zbinden Basel: R.G..Google Scholar
Westbury, John
1975 “The status of regressive voicing assimilation as a rule of Russian”. Texas Lingustic Forum , 1,131–144. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Whalen, Douglas H.
1990 “Coarticulation is largely planned”. Journal of Phonetics 18.3–35.Google Scholar
Whalen, Douglas H. & Patrice S. Beddor.
1989 “Connections between nasality and vowel duration and height: Elucidation of the Eastern Algonquian intrusive nasal”. Language 65.457–486.Google Scholar
Williams, E.B.
1938  From Latin to Portuguese . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Winitz, Harris, M.E. Scheib & James A. Reeds.
1972 “Identification of stops and vowels for the burst portion of /p, t, k/ isolated from conversational speech”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51.1309–1317.Google Scholar
Wireback, Kenneth J.
2002 “Consonant + yod metathesis in Hispano-Romance”. Romanische Forschungen 114.133–159.Google Scholar
2010 “A reexamination of the palatalization of Latin /kt/ in the light of phonetic research”. Experimental Phonetics and Sound Change ed. by Daniel Recasens, Fernando Sánchez Miret & Kenneth J. Wireback, 99–114. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney
1979 “A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels”. Journal of Phonetics, 7.25–43.Google Scholar
Yeou, Mohamed
1997 “Locus equations and the degree of coarticulation of Arabic consonants”. Phonetica 54.187–202.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan
, ed. 2013  Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamora Vicente, Alonso
1989  Dialectología española , 2nd edition. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Zee, Eric
1981 “Effect of vowel quality on perception of post-vocalic nasal consonants in noise”. Journal of Phonetics 9.35–48.Google Scholar
Zharkova, Natalia
2007  An Investigation of Coarticulation Resistance in Speech Production Using Ultrasound , Ph.D. thesis, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Zygis, Marzena, Daniel Recasens & Aina Espinosa.
2010 “The role of position in testing the acoustic-equivalence hypothesis of velar softening for aspirated stops”. Between the Regular and the Particular in Speech and Language ed. by Susanne Fuchs, Philip Hoole, Christine Mooshammer & Marzena Zygis, 125–144. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Historical linguistics
Phonology
Romance linguistics
Theoretical linguistics
BIC Subject: CFH – Phonetics, phonology
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014000552 | Marc record