This paper focuses on the various demonstrative and relative constructions attested in the two Ju dialectal groups for which some level of documentation is available, viz. North-Central and South-Eastern, and proposes a unified diachronic account of the diversity of properties and uses of these constructions. The main claim is that exophoric demonstratives were verbs in Proto-Ju. Demonstrative and relative constructions in modern Ju dialects are shown to derive through various grammaticalisation pathways from these Proto-Ju verbal demonstratives and a relative construction still marginally attested in modern North-Central Ju. The complexity found in North-Central lects is due to numerous innovations (in particular the depredicativisation of non-canonical verbal categories) and the co-occurrence of many historical layers in synchrony. Juǀ’hoan, on the other hand underwent only minor changes, preserving most of the properties of the Proto-Ju demonstrative and relative constructions.
2022. Extending !Xun dialect comparisons with a Ju|’hoan variety spoken in |Xae|xae, Botswana: gender classes, plural markers and loanwords. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Pratchett, Lee J.
2021. An areal and typological appraisal of gender in Ju. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Güldemann, Tom & Anne-Maria Fehn
2017. The Kalahari Basin Area as a ‘Sprachbund’ before the Bantu Expansion. In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ► pp. 500 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.