Article published in:
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 77–100

Muta cum liquida in the light of Tertenia Sardinian metathesis and compensatory lengthening Latin tr > Old French Vrr

| Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CNRS 6039
This article is designed to show that muta cum liquida (branching onsets) enclose an empty nucleus (in case they are bipositional). Arguments come from two data sets. A compensatory lengthening is studied that has occurred in the evolution from Latin to Old French within a muta cum liquida: tr dr > rr, i.e., the loss of t d is accompanied by the gemination of r iff the preceding vowel is short (petra > pierre vs. paatre > père). In Tertenia Sardinian, it is argued that metathesis of r from the right to the left of the o in /sesø døormendu/ → srø ðørɔmmέndu; ndu (with ensuing gemination of the m on the position vacated) occurs in order to circumscribe the second of two empty nuclei (ø) in a row.
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.07sch
References

References

Anderson, John
2011 The Substance of Language. Vol.1 The Domain of Syntax. Vol.2 Morphology, Paradigms, and Periphrases. Vol.3 Phonology-Syntax Analogies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto
2002 “Morphologically Conditioned Phonological Alternations”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.1–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, Roberto
1998 The Phonology of Campidanian Sardinian. Dordrecht: HIL.Google Scholar
Bourciez, Édouard & Jean Bourciez
1967 Phonétique française. 9th edition. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine & Tobias Scheer
2010 “Lenition in Branching Onsets in French and in ALF dialects”. Development of Language Through the Lens of Formal Linguistics ed. by Petr Karlík, 15–28. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chene, Brent De & Stephen Anderson
1979 “Compensatory Lengthening”. Language 55.505–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1986 “Length, Syllabification and the Phonological Cycle in Italian”. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8.5–34.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries: The framework”. Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 “Three Factors in Language Design”. Linguistic Inquiry 36.1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Contini, Michele
1987 Etude de géographie phonétique et de phonétique instrumentale du sarde. 2 vols. Alessandria: dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2010 Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fouché, Pierre
1966–1973 Phonétique historique du français. 3 vols. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gess, Randall
1998 “Compensatory Lengthening and Structure Preservation Revisited”. Phonology 15.353–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules & Edmond Edmont
1902–1912 Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob
1996 “An Optimality Account of Onset-Sensitive Stress in Quantity-Insensitive Languages”. The Linguistic Review 13.33–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya
2002 Compensatory Lengthening. Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan
1990 “ ‘Coda’ Licensing”. Phonology 7.301–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1990 “Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology”. Phonology 7.193–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Rosangela
2009 “Gradi di forza nelle occlusive di una sotto-varietà campidanese dell'Ogliastra”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 33.85–100.Google Scholar
2013 Positional Effects in Sardinian Muta Cum Liquida: Lenition, metathesis, and liquid deletion. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso.Google Scholar
2014 “Positional Factors in the Evolution of Sardinian Muta cum Liquida: A case study”. L'Italia Dialettale 75. 149–160.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
1996 “CV as the Only Syllable Type”. Current Trends in Phonology. Models and methods ed. by Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks, vol. 2, 419–441. Salford & Manchester: ESRI.Google Scholar
1999 “The Beginning of the Word”. Phonologica 1996 ed. by John Rennison & Klaus Kühnhammer, 153–166. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna
2008 “Lenition in Tuscan Italian (Gorgia Toscana)”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 235–271. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John
2002 A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molinu, Lucia
1998 La syllabe en sarde. Ph.D dissertation, Université Stendhal, Grenoble.
Pater, Joe
2009 “Morpheme-Specific Phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution”. Phonological Argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation ed. by Steve Parker, 123–154. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred
1952 From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Haj
1984 “Inner Islands”. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay, 258–265.
Sanoudaki, Eirini
2010 “Towards a Typology of Word Initial Consonant Clusters: Evidence from the acquisition of Greek”. Journal of Greek Linguistics 10.1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
1999 “A Theory of Consonantal Interaction”. Folia Linguistica 32.201–237.Google Scholar
2000a De la localité, de la morphologie et de la phonologie en phonologie. Habilitation thesis, Université de Nice.
2000b On Some Consequences of Dephoneticized Phonology. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Skeleton, Budapest 29–30 May 2000.
2004 A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol.1: What is CVCV, and Why Should it Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “On the Status of Word-Initial Clusters in Slavic (And Elsewhere)”. Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Toronto Meeting 2006 ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska & Ulyana Savchenko, 346–364. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2009 “External Sandhi: What the initial CV is initial of”. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 47.43–82.Google Scholar
2012 A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol.2: Direct Interface and One-Channel Translation: A non-diacritic theory of the morphosyntax-phonology interface. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias & Markéta Ziková
2010 “The Coda Mirror v2”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57:4.411–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ségéral, Philippe & Tobias Scheer
2001 “La Coda-Miroir”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 96.107–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “What Lenition and Fortition Tells us About Gallo-Romance Muta cum Liquida”. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs, 235–267. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Coda Mirror, Stress and Positional Parameters”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 483–518. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. “Phonétique historique”. Grande grammaire historique du français ed. by Christiane Marchello-Nizia, Bernard Combettes, Sophie Prévost & Tobias Scheer
Seigneur-Froli, Delphine
2003 “Diachronic Consonant Lenition and Exotic Word-Initial Clusters in Greek: A unified account”. Studies in Greek Linguistics 23. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics of AUTH ed. by Melita Stavrou-Sifaki & Asimakis Fliatouras, 345–357. Thessaloniki: University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001 Move Dissolves Into Merge: A theory of locality. Ph.D dissertation, University of Geneva.
Straka, Georges
1979 Les sons et les mots. Choix d'études de phonétique et de linguistique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2006 “Strong vs. Weak Islands”. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, vol. IV, 479–531. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szigetvári, Péter
2008 “Two Directions for Lenition”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 561–592. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szigetvári, Péter & Tobias Scheer
2005 “Unified Representations for the Syllable and Stress”. Phonology 22.37–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Topintzi, Nina
2010 Onsets. Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M.L.
1941 Historische Lautlehre des Sardischen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo & Engin Sezer
eds. 1986 Studies in Compensatory Lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Charette, Monik
2017.  In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.