Cover not available
Part of
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 77–100

Muta cum liquida in the light of Tertenia Sardinian metathesis and compensatory lengthening Latin tr > Old French Vrr

| Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CNRS 6039
This article is designed to show that muta cum liquida (branching onsets) enclose an empty nucleus (in case they are bipositional). Arguments come from two data sets. A compensatory lengthening is studied that has occurred in the evolution from Latin to Old French within a muta cum liquida: tr dr > rr, i.e., the loss of t d is accompanied by the gemination of r iff the preceding vowel is short (petra > pierre vs. paatre > père). In Tertenia Sardinian, it is argued that metathesis of r from the right to the left of the o in /sesø døormendu/ → srø ðørɔmmέndu; ndu (with ensuing gemination of the m on the position vacated) occurs in order to circumscribe the second of two empty nuclei (ø) in a row.
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.07sch
References (52)
References
Anderson, John. 2011. The Substance of Language. Vol.1 The Domain of Syntax. Vol.2 Morphology, Paradigms, and Periphrases. Vol.3 Phonology-Syntax Analogies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 2002. “Morphologically Conditioned Phonological Alternations”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, Roberto. 1998. The Phonology of Campidanian Sardinian. Dordrecht: HIL.Google Scholar
Bourciez, Édouard & Jean Bourciez. 1967. Phonétique française. 9th edition. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine & Tobias Scheer. 2010. “Lenition in Branching Onsets in French and in ALF dialects”. Development of Language Through the Lens of Formal Linguistics ed. by Petr Karlík, 15–28. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chene, Brent De & Stephen Anderson. 1979. “Compensatory Lengthening”. Language 55.505–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1986. “Length, Syllabification and the Phonological Cycle in Italian”. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8.5–34.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The framework”. Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Three Factors in Language Design”. Linguistic Inquiry 36.1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contini, Michele. 1987. Etude de géographie phonétique et de phonétique instrumentale du sarde. 2 vols. Alessandria: dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fouché, Pierre. 1966–1973. Phonétique historique du français. 3 vols. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gess, Randall. 1998. “Compensatory Lengthening and Structure Preservation Revisited”. Phonology 15.353–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules & Edmond Edmont. 1902–1912. Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob. 1996. “An Optimality Account of Onset-Sensitive Stress in Quantity-Insensitive Languages”. The Linguistic Review 13.33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya. 2002. Compensatory Lengthening. Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan. 1990. “‘Coda’ Licensing”. Phonology 7.301–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. “Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology”. Phonology 7.193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Rosangela. 2009. “Gradi di forza nelle occlusive di una sotto-varietà campidanese dell'Ogliastra”. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 33.85–100.Google Scholar
. 2013. Positional Effects in Sardinian Muta Cum Liquida: Lenition, metathesis, and liquid deletion. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Positional Factors in the Evolution of Sardinian Muta cum Liquida: A case study”. L'Italia Dialettale 75. 149–160.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 1996. “CV as the Only Syllable Type”. Current Trends in Phonology. Models and methods ed. by Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks, vol. 2, 419–441. Salford & Manchester: ESRI.Google Scholar
. 1999. “The Beginning of the Word”. Phonologica 1996 ed. by John Rennison & Klaus Kühnhammer, 153–166. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 2008. “Lenition in Tuscan Italian (Gorgia Toscana)”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 235–271. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molinu, Lucia. 1998. La syllabe en sarde. Ph.D dissertation, Université Stendhal, Grenoble.
Pater, Joe. 2009. “Morpheme-Specific Phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution”. Phonological Argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation ed. by Steve Parker, 123–154. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred. 1952. From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Haj. 1984. “Inner Islands”. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay, 258–265.
Sanoudaki, Eirini. 2010. “Towards a Typology of Word Initial Consonant Clusters: Evidence from the acquisition of Greek”. Journal of Greek Linguistics 10.1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 1999. “A Theory of Consonantal Interaction”. Folia Linguistica 32.201–237.Google Scholar
. 2000a. De la localité, de la morphologie et de la phonologie en phonologie. Habilitation thesis, Université de Nice.
. 2000b. On Some Consequences of Dephoneticized Phonology. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Skeleton, Budapest 29–30 May 2000.
. 2004. A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol.1: What is CVCV, and Why Should it Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “On the Status of Word-Initial Clusters in Slavic (And Elsewhere)”. Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Toronto Meeting 2006 ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska & Ulyana Savchenko, 346–364. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
. 2009. “External Sandhi: What the initial CV is initial of”. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 47.43–82.Google Scholar
. 2012. A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Vol.2: Direct Interface and One-Channel Translation: A non-diacritic theory of the morphosyntax-phonology interface. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias & Markéta Ziková. 2010. “The Coda Mirror v2”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57:4.411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ségéral, Philippe & Tobias Scheer. 2001. “La Coda-Miroir”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 96.107–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “What Lenition and Fortition Tells us About Gallo-Romance Muta cum Liquida”. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs, 235–267. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The Coda Mirror, Stress and Positional Parameters”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 483–518. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. “Phonétique historique”. Grande grammaire historique du français ed. by Christiane Marchello-Nizia, Bernard Combettes, Sophie Prévost & Tobias Scheer.
Seigneur-Froli, Delphine. 2003. “Diachronic Consonant Lenition and Exotic Word-Initial Clusters in Greek: A unified account”. Studies in Greek Linguistics 23. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics of AUTH ed. by Melita Stavrou-Sifaki & Asimakis Fliatouras, 345–357. Thessaloniki: University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move Dissolves Into Merge: A theory of locality. Ph.D dissertation, University of Geneva.
Straka, Georges. 1979. Les sons et les mots. Choix d'études de phonétique et de linguistique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. “Strong vs. Weak Islands”. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, vol. IV, 479–531. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szigetvári, Péter. 2008. “Two Directions for Lenition”. Lenition and Fortition ed. by Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral, 561–592. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szigetvári, Péter & Tobias Scheer. 2005. “Unified Representations for the Syllable and Stress”. Phonology 22.37–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topintzi, Nina. 2010. Onsets. Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M.L. 1941. Historische Lautlehre des Sardischen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo & Engin Sezer, eds. 1986. Studies in Compensatory Lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Marr, Clayton & David Mortensen
2023. Large-scale computerized forward reconstruction yields new perspectives in French diachronic phonology. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Charette, Monik
2017. The internal TR clusters of Acadian French. In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.