Article published in:
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 101–118

Schwa at the phonology/syntax interface

| Northern Illinois University
It is claimed in this paper that the well known incongruence between the phonology and the syntax is resolved by removing syntactic boundaries by means of the rhythmic patterning. Resulting from this is a direct interface between the phonological phrasing and the syntax. The intermediary of the prosodic component is thereby eliminated. Accordingly, it is emphasized that language is rhythmic and that the rhythm of any given language directly interprets the syntactic constituency. The instrument by which this is achieved is the rhythmic foot, which contravenes the syntactic constituency directly and restructures it to align it with the rhythmic patterning. In contrast to Nespor (1990), therefore, this approach takes into account no separation between the prosody and rhythm. As a result, it limits the need for pre-compiled rules as proposed by Hayes (1990). Especially targeted in relation to this discussion is the behavior of French schwa.
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.08maz
References

References

Bickmore, Lee
1990 “Branching Nodes and Prosodic Categories”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 1–17.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
2000 Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew
1990 “What Must Phonology Know about Syntax?”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 19–46.
Côté, Marie-Hélène
2004 “Syntagmatic Distinctness in Consonant Deletion”. Phonology 21.1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Rhythmic Constraints on the Distribution of Schwa in French”. Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by José Camacho, Nydia Flores-Ferrán, Liliana Sánchez, Viviane Déprez & María José Cabrera, 81–95. Amsterdam & Philadelpia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène & Geoffrey S. Morrison
2007 “The Nature of the Schwa-Zero Alternation in French Clitics: Experimental and non-experimental evidence”. Journal of French Language Studies 17.150–186.Google Scholar
Dell, François
1985 Les règles et les sons. 2nd ed. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S.J.
1995a Prosodic Structure and French Morphophonology. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995b “The Phonological Word in French”. Linguistics 33.1125–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1990 “Precompiled Phrasal Phonology”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 85–108.
Hoskins, Steven
1994 “Secondary Stress and Stress Clash Resolution in French: An empirical investigation”. Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics ed. by Michael L. Mazzola, 35–47. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Draga Zec
eds. 1990 The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1995 “Syntax-Phonology Interface”. The Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. by John A. Goldsmith, 535–549. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen
1985 Connected Speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre
1966 La prononciation du français standard. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe
1978 “Questions de phonosyntaxe et de phono-sémantique en français”. Linguisticae Investigationes 2:1.93–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979 “Sur les principes d’une théorie syntaxique de l’intonation”. Problèmes de prosodie ed. by Pierre Léon & Mario Rossi, 91–101. Ottawa: Marcel Didier.Google Scholar
1981 “L ’ intonation est-elle une structure congruente à la syntaxe?”. L ’ Intonation. De l ’ acoustique à la sémantique ed. by Mario Rossi, 234–271. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Mazzola, Michael L.
1991 “Stress Clash and Segment Deletion”. Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics ed. by Christiane Laeufer & Terrell Morgan, 81–97. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 “French Rhythm and French Segments”. Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the XXI Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Santa Barbara, February 21–24, 1991 ed. by William Ashby, Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perissinotto & Eduardo Raposo, 113–126. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 “Indirect Phonology and French Segments”. Generative French Phonology: Retrospective and perspectives ed. by Chantal Lyche, 191–209. Salford: Association for French Language Studies & European Research Institute.Google Scholar
1996 “Syntactic Constituency and Prosodic Phenomena”. Aspects of Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV ed. by Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 313–327. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1998 “Suprasegmental Constituency as the Domain for Sandhi Variation”. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists ed. by Bernard Caron. CD-Rom #0175. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1999 “On the Independence of Suprasegmental Constituency”. Issues in Phonological Structure ed. by S.J. Hannahs & Mike Davenport, 181–193. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Prosodic Domains for Segment Deletion”. 1999 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers ed. by Michael Henderson, 285–294. Lawrence, Kan.: Linguistics Department, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
2006 “Rhythm and Prosodic Change”. Historical Romance Linguistics: Retrospective and perspectives ed. by Deborah Arteaga & Randall Gess, 97–110. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles
1974 “Règles phonologiques à domaine indéterminé: Chute du cheva en français”. Cahier de linguistique 4.69–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina
1990 “On the Separation of Prosodic and Rhythmic Phonology”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 241–258.
Nespor, Marina, & Irene Vogel
1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Odden, David
1987 “Kimatuumbi Phrasal Phonology”. Phonology Yearbook 4.13–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Passy, Paul
1899 Les sons du français. Paris: Firmin-Didot & Société des Traités.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1984 Phonology and Syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard
1987 The Sounds of French. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zec, Draga & Sharon Inkelas
1990 “Prosodically Constrained Syntax”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 365–378.