References (34)
References
Bickmore, Lee. 1990. “Branching Nodes and Prosodic Categories”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 1–17.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2000. Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew. 1990. “What Must Phonology Know about Syntax?”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 19–46.
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2004. “Syntagmatic Distinctness in Consonant Deletion”. Phonology 21.1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Rhythmic Constraints on the Distribution of Schwa in French”. Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by José Camacho, Nydia Flores-Ferrán, Liliana Sánchez, Viviane Déprez & María José Cabrera, 81–95. Amsterdam & Philadelpia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène & Geoffrey S. Morrison. 2007. “The Nature of the Schwa-Zero Alternation in French Clitics: Experimental and non-experimental evidence”. Journal of French Language Studies 17.150–186.Google Scholar
Dell, François. 1985. Les règles et les sons. 2nd ed. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S.J. 1995a. Prosodic Structure and French Morphophonology. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995b. “The Phonological Word in French”. Linguistics 33.1125–1144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1990. “Precompiled Phrasal Phonology”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 85–108.
Hoskins, Steven. 1994. “Secondary Stress and Stress Clash Resolution in French: An empirical investigation”. Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics ed. by Michael L. Mazzola, 35–47. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Draga Zec, eds. 1990. The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Syntax-Phonology Interface”. The Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. by John A. Goldsmith, 535–549. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1985. Connected Speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre. 1966. La prononciation du français standard. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Martin, Philippe. 1978. “Questions de phonosyntaxe et de phono-sémantique en français”. Linguisticae Investigationes 2:1.93–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. “Sur les principes d’une théorie syntaxique de l’intonation”. Problèmes de prosodie ed. by Pierre Léon & Mario Rossi, 91–101. Ottawa: Marcel Didier.Google Scholar
. 1981. “L ’ intonation est-elle une structure congruente à la syntaxe?”. L ’ Intonation. De l ’ acoustique à la sémantique ed. by Mario Rossi, 234–271. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Mazzola, Michael L. 1991. “Stress Clash and Segment Deletion”. Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics ed. by Christiane Laeufer & Terrell Morgan, 81–97. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. “French Rhythm and French Segments”. Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the XXI Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Santa Barbara, February 21–24, 1991 ed. by William Ashby, Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perissinotto & Eduardo Raposo, 113–126. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “Indirect Phonology and French Segments”. Generative French Phonology: Retrospective and perspectives ed. by Chantal Lyche, 191–209. Salford: Association for French Language Studies & European Research Institute.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Syntactic Constituency and Prosodic Phenomena”. Aspects of Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV ed. by Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 313–327. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Suprasegmental Constituency as the Domain for Sandhi Variation”. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists ed. by Bernard Caron. CD-Rom #0175. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “On the Independence of Suprasegmental Constituency”. Issues in Phonological Structure ed. by S.J. Hannahs & Mike Davenport, 181–193. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Prosodic Domains for Segment Deletion”. 1999 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers ed. by Michael Henderson, 285–294. Lawrence, Kan.: Linguistics Department, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Rhythm and Prosodic Change”. Historical Romance Linguistics: Retrospective and perspectives ed. by Deborah Arteaga & Randall Gess, 97–110. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1974. “Règles phonologiques à domaine indéterminé: Chute du cheva en français”. Cahier de linguistique 4.69–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina. 1990. “On the Separation of Prosodic and Rhythmic Phonology”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 241–258.
Nespor, Marina, & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1987. “Kimatuumbi Phrasal Phonology”. Phonology Yearbook 4.13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Passy, Paul. 1899. Les sons du français. Paris: Firmin-Didot & Société des Traités.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1987. The Sounds of French. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zec, Draga & Sharon Inkelas. 1990. “Prosodically Constrained Syntax”. Inkelas & Zec, eds., 365–378.