Cover not available
Part of
Variation within and across Romance Languages: Selected papers from the 41st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ottawa, 5–7 May 2011
Edited by Marie-Hélène Côté and Eric Mathieu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 333] 2014
► pp. 233–254

On subjunctives and islandhood

| Ghent University
| University of Geneva
This article discusses the relation between selection, subjunctive mood and extraction facts. We show that the degree of permeability observed in subjunctive clauses with respect to, e.g., wh-extraction is apparent, and is only indirectly related to the indicative/subjunctive alternation. We examine different verb classes in French and show that the behavior of various types of wh-phrases in extraction contexts is not directly linked to the mood of the embedded clause. We therefore propose (i) that the indicative-subjunctive distribution is a property of predicates that has to be distinguished from the property involved in complementizer selection. In a nutshell, in French, the subjunctive-indicative alternation can be accounted for in terms of the emotive–cognitive property of the matrix predicate; and (ii) that islands effects, that is, the degree of permeability of the embedded clauses can be related to the properties of the selected complementizer. In other words, the possibilities of extraction of a wh-phrase from an embedded clause can be accounted for by the size of the complementizer that acts as a more or less strong blocker for wh-extraction from the clause it selects. We therefore propose that mood ‘selection’ and complementizer selection are two independent properties of the main predicate.
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.333.16bau
References (36)
References
Baunaz, Lena. 2011. The Grammar of French Quantification. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “On the Various Sizes of Complementizers”. Probus. Volume 0, Issue 0, ISSN (Online) 1613-4079, ISSN (Print) 0921-4771, DOI logo, April 2014.Google Scholar
Baunaz, Lena & Genoveva Puskás. 2008. “Feature Stripping and Wh-movement in French and Hungarian”. Selected Proceedings of the 34th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa ed. by Paola Benincà, Federico Damonte & Nicoletta Penello. Special Issue of the Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33.43–60. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Beaver, David. 2010. “Have you Noticed that your Belly Button Lint Colour is Related to the Colour of your Clothing?” Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays offered to Hans Kamp ed. by Reyle Bäuerle, Uwe Reyle & Thomas E. Zimmermann, 65–99. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos & Barbara Ürögdi. 2010. “Clearing up the ‘Facts’ on Complementation”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16:1.Article 6. [[URL]]Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka & Anastasia Giannakidou. 1996. “How Clause-bounded is the Scope of Universals?” In Proceedings of SALT VI ed. by Teresa Gallway & Justin Spence, 35–52. Ithaca, N.Y.: CLC Publications Cornell University.Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2008. “Factifs cognitifs, factifs émotifs, liage bas et accommodation locale”. Verbum 28:4.415–431.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. The Landscape of Polarity Items. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.
. 2000. “Negative Concord and the Scope of Universals”. Transactions of the Philological Society 98.87–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “The Dependency of the Subjunctive Revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity”. Twists of Mood: The distribution and interpretation of indicative and subjunctive ed. by Josep Quer. Special issue of Lingua 119:12.1883–1908. Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 2004. “Complementizer Deletion in Italian”. The Structure of CP and IP ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 190–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 2002. The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Spanish Mood. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1975. “On Assertive Predicates”. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 4 ed. by John P. Kimball, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971, “Some Observations on Factivity”. Papers in Linguistics 5.55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. “Fact”. Progress in Linguistics ed. by Manfried Bierwish & Karl Heidolph, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Léger, Catherine. 2006. La complémentation de type phrastique des adjectifs en français. Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. “On the Nature of Proper Government”. Linguistic Inquiry 15.235–289.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo Savoia. 2003. “The Nature of Complementizers”. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28.87–110.Google Scholar
Mørdrup, Ole. 1975. “Présuppositions, implications et verbes français”. Revue romane 10.125–157.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. “Wh-in-Situ: Movement and unselective binding”. The Representation of (In)definites ed. by Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1992. “The Inherent Variability of the French subjunctive.” Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the 19th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by Christiane Laeufer & Terrell A. Morgan, 235–263. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep. 1998. Mood at the Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
. 2009. “Twists of Mood: The distribution and interpretation of indicative and subjunctive”. Lingua 119.1779–1787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. “Locality and Left Periphery”. Structures and Beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3 ed. by Adriana Belletti, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2009. “In the Mood for Control”. Lingua 119. 1811–1836. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Selecting Complementizers”. Exploring the Left Periphery ed. by Kleanthes Grohmann & Ianthi M. Tsimpli. Special issue of Lingua 120:3.582–603.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. “The Lazy Frenchman’s Approach to the Subjunctive”. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected papers from Going Romance 2003 ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jakobs, 269–309. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1990. El tiempo en las subordinadas. Tiempo y aspecto en español ed. by Ignacio Bosque, 77–105. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Socanac, Tomislav. 2011. “Subjunctive in Serbian/Croatian”. Proceedings of SWIGG’11. Generative Grammar in Geneva 7.49–70.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Subjunctive Complements in South Slavic Languages: Distributional issues”. Proceedings of SWIGG’12. Generative Grammar in Geneva 8.1–22.Google Scholar

Starke, Michal. 2010. Towards an Elegant Solution to Language Variation: Variation reduces to the size of lexically stored trees. Ms., Barcelona. [URL]
Starke, Michal. 2001. Merge Dissolves into Move. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Tóth, Enikő. 2008. Mood Choice in Complement Clauses. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Villalta, Elisabeth. 2006. Context Dependence in the Interpretation of Questions and Subjunctives. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
. 2008. “Mood and Gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish”. Linguistics and Philosophy 31:4.467–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1995. “Nonveridical Contexts”. Linguistic Analysis 25.286–312.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Fliessbach, Jan & Johanna Rockstroh
2024. Verb influence on French wh-placement: a parallel corpus study. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo
Martínez Vera, Gabriel
2020. On Phase-over-Phase Configurations and phase collapsing:wh-extraction in V +de +CP clauses in Spanish. The Linguistic Review 37:3 ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Quer, Josep
2017. Subjunctives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.