Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 195–212

Differential Object Marking in Old Japanese

A corpus-based study

| University of Oslo
| University of Oxford
| Tsukuba University
Within the past few decades, various proposals have been made about marking of objects in Old Japanese (e.g., Matsunaga 1983, Motohashi 1989, Yanagida 2006, Kuroda 2008, Yanagida & Whitman 2009, Wrona & Frellesvig 2010, Kinsui 2011, Miyagawa 2012), but there is still no consensus about the exact circumstances determining when direct objects are bare or accusative case marked in Old Japanese. We use the material in the Oxford Corpus of Old Japanese to examine in detail the distribution of bare and accusative case marked objects in Old Japanese texts and show that Old Japanese had ‘differential object marking (DOM)’ associated with a specific/non-specific distinction (Yanagida & Whitman 2009). Thus, in Old Japanese, accusative case marked objects are specific, but bare objects are non-specific. This paper briefly discusses cases in which accusative case is dropped from specific objects.
Keywords: accusative case marking, corpus, differential object marking, D-linking, objects, Old Japanese, specificity
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.11fre
References (16)
References
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A-bar Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. “The Semantics of Specificity”. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2011. “Tōgōron [Syntax]”. Bunpōshi [Historical Grammar ],ed. by Satoshi Kinsui, Yoshiyuki Takayama, Tomohide Kinuhata & Tomoko Okazaki, 77–166. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin E. 1993. “WH-movement and Specificity”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11:85–120. Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 2008. “On the Syntax of Old Japanese”. Current Issues in the History and Structure of Japanese ed. by Bjarke Frellesvig, Masayoshi Shibatani & John Charles Smith, 263–317. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsunaga, Setsuko. 1983. “The Development of Case Marking in Japanese”. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Matsuo, Osamu. 1944. “Kyakugo hyōji no joshi ‘o’ ni tuite”. Kokugogaku Ronshū. ed. by ­Hashimoto Hakase Kanreki Kinenkai, 617–644. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Case, Argument Structure and Word Order. Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1989. Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 22. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Motohashi, Tatsushi. 1989. Case Theory and the History of the Japanese Language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. “Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective Binding”. The representation of (In)definiteness, ed. by Eric J. Reuland & Alice G.B. ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Yuko. 2006. “Word Order and Clause Structure in Early Old Japanese”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15:37–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Miyagawa’s (1989) Exceptions: An Ergative Analysis”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol.55:265–276, ed. by Yoichi Miyamoto. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Yuko & John Whitman. 2009. “Word Order and Alignment in Old Japanese”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18:2.101–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrona, Janick & Bjarke Frellesvig. 2010. “The Old Japanese Case System: The Function of wo”. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 17.565–580. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Aldridge, Edith & Yuko Yanagida
2021. Two types of alignment change in nominalizations. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Yanagida, Yuko
2018. Chapter 9. Differential argument marking and object movement in Old Japanese. In Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 250], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.