Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5-9 August 2013
Edited by Dag T.T. Haug
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 334] 2015
► pp. 233–256

Hate and anger, love and desire

The construal of emotions in Homeric Greek

ORCID logo | University of Pavia
| University of Pavia
In Homeric Greek verbs that indicate negative emotions such as anger, hate, and envy take the NominativeDative construction, while verbs that indicate love, desire, and affection take the NominativeGenitive construction. The two constructions are typical of different verb classes: the former mainly occurs with verbs of social interaction, while the latter is mostly associated with verbs of hitting, touching, and striving. A further difference between the two groups of emotion verbs is that only verbs that indicate negative feelings are used in the imperative and co-occur with cause expressions. We argue that the extension of either construction to verbs of emotion accounts for different construals: while situations of anger, hate and envy are construed as interactive, with an agent that initiates an event and a second participant that may react, love and desire are construed as uncontrolled and not interactive.
Keywords: constructions, experiencer, experiential situations, stimulus, verb classes
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.13lur
References (20)
References
Conti, Luz. 1998. “Zum Passiv von griechischen Verben mit Gen. bzw. Dat. als zweitem Komplement”. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 58.13–50.Google Scholar
. 1999. “La expresión de la causa en Homero con referentes humanos”. Emerita – Revista de Lingüística y Filología Clásica 77:2. 295–313.Google Scholar
. 2010a. “Weiteres zum Genitiv als Semisubjekt im Altgriechischen: Analyse des Kasus bei impersonalen Konstruktionen”. Historische Sprachforschungen 122.182–207.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Análisis del dativo en construcciones impersonales: los conceptos de sujeto y de semisujeto en griego antiguo”. Emerita – Revista de Lingüística y Filología Clásica 78:2. 249–273.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Silvia Luraghi. 2014. “The Ancient Greek Partitive Genitive in Typological Perspective”. Partitive Cases and Related Categories ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gryuter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1993. “Case Marking and the Semantics of Mental Verbs”. Semantics and the lexicon ed. by James Pustejovsky, 55–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1968. Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dirven, René. 1993. “Dividing up Physical and Mental Spaces into Conceptual Categories by Means of English Prepositions”. The Semantics of Prepositions: From Mental Processing to Natural Language Processing ed. by Cornelia Zelinsky-Wibbelt, 73–97. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gryuter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. “The Behaviour-before-coding Principle in Syntactic Change”. Mélanges Denis Creissels ed. by Franck Floricic, 493–506. Paris: Presses de l’École Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Klein, Katarina & Silvia Kutscher. 2002. Psych-verbs and Lexical Economy (= Theorie des Lexikons, 122). Düsseldorf: Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2003a. On the Meaning of Cases and Prepositions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. “Definite Referential Null Objects in Ancient Greek”. Indogermanische Forschungen 108. 169–196.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Evolution of Local Cases and Their Grammatical Equivalent in Greek and Latin”. The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Celliah, 283–305. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. “Experiencer Predicates in Hittite”. Ex Anatolia Lux ed. by Ronald I. Kim, et al., 249–264. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “The Extension of the Transitive Construction in Ancient Greek”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia42:1. 60–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Plotting Diachronic Semantic Maps: The Role of Metaphor”. Perspectives on Semantic Roles ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog, 101–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Barbara McGillivray & Eleonora Sausa. 2012. “Verbal Valency and Classes of Verbs in Ancient Greek. Bivalent Verbs in Homer”. Paper Presented at 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , Stockholm, September 2012.
Sausa, Eleonora. In preparation. Argument Structure Construction in Ancient Greek. An Analysis of Bivalent Verbs in Homer. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pavia.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2007. Experiential Constructions in Yucatec Maya. Amsterdam & ­Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1999. Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ovsjannikova, Maria & Sergey Say
2021. Stimulus encoding in constructions with past passive participles in Russian: construal and diachrony. Russian Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia
2016. The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.