Cover not available
Part of
The Phonetics–Phonology Interface: Representations and methodologies
Edited by Joaquín Romero and María Riera
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 335] 2015
► pp. 71–90

Phonology versus phonetics in loanword adaptations

A reassessment of English vowels in French

| Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), Paris
The question of whether loanword adaptation is based on phonological or phonetic proximity has been widely debated. Focusing on the adaptation of English vowels in French, I argue that on-line adaptations are based on perceived phonetic proximity, which is influenced by co-articulatory information. A perception experiment assessed French listeners’ perception of English vowels presented both within and spliced out of CVC syllables; the results were compared to the on-line adaptations of the same vowels in the same consonantal contexts produced previously by French speakers (Vendelin & Peperkamp 2006). Vowel identification in the two conditions differed, and the on-line adaptations are reflected more closely by the condition with vowels presented in context. These results support the hypothesis that on-line adaptations are based on phonetic, not phonological, proximity. They also show that phonetic variability due to coarticulation influences perception and hence that consonantal context should be controlled for in cross-linguistic vowel comparisons.
Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.335.04pep
References (40)
References
Best, Catherine T. 1995. “A Direct Realist View of Cross-Language Speech Perception”. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in cross-language research ed. by Winifred Strange, 171-204. Baltimore, Md.: York Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Devil or Angel in the Details?: Perceiving phonetic variation as information about phonological structure”. This volume.
Best, Catherine T. & Michael D. Tyler. 2007. “Nonnative and Second-Language Speech Perception: Commonalities and complementarities”. Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In honor of James Emil Flege ed. by Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Murray J. Munro, 13-34. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Catherine T. Best. 2012. “Native-Language Phonetic and Phonological Influences on Perception of American English Approximants by Danish and German Listeners”. Journal of Phonetics 40:1.109-128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1981. “An Acoustic and Articulatory Study of Vowel Reduction in Four Languages”. Pierre Delattre: Studies in comparative phonetics ed. by Bertil Malmberg, 63-93. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre, Alvin M. Liberman, Franklin S. Cooper & Louis J. Gerstman. 1952. “An Experimental Study of the Acoustic Determinants of Vowel Color: Observations on one- and two-formant vowels synthesized from spectrographic patterns”. Word 8:3.195-210.Google Scholar
Escudero, Paola, Ellen Simon & Hoeger Mitterer. 2012. “The Perception of English Front Vowels by North Holland and Flemish Listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception”. Journal of Phonetics 40:2.280-288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1995. “Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, findings, and problems”. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in cross-language research ed. by Winifred Strange, 233-277. Baltimore, Md.: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Naoyuki Takagi & Virginia Mann. 1996. “Lexical Familiarity and English-Language Experience Affect Japanese Adults’ Perception of /ɹ/ and /l/”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99:2.1161-1173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Robert A., James E. Flege & Murray J. Munro. 1995. “The Perception of English and Spanish Vowels by Native English and Spanish Listeners”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97:4.2540-2551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya & Takashi Kawashima. 1968. “The Roles of Pitch and Higher Formants in the Perception of Vowels”. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 16:1.73-77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallé, Pierre, Catherine T. Best & Andrea Levitt. 1999. “Phonetic vs. Phonological Influences on French Listeners’ Perception of American English Approximants”. Journal of Phonetics 27:3.281-306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James M., Michael J. Clark & Robert A. Houde. 2000. “Some Effects of Duration on Vowel Recognition”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108:6.3013-3022. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James M., Michael J. Clark & Terrance M. Nearey. 2001. “Effects of Consonant Environment on Vowel Formant Patterns”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109:2.748-763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James M. & Terrance M. Nearey. 1999. “Identification of Resynthesized /hVd/ Utterances: Effects of formant contour”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105:6.3509-3523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Caroline B-Y. 1991. An Acoustic and Perceptual Study of Vowel Formant Trajectories in American English. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. 2003. “Perceptual Similarity in Loanword Adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean”. Phonology 20:2.219-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Loanword Phonology”. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology ed. by Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice, vol. IV, 2258-2281. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Soohee & Emily Curtis. 2002. “Phonetic Duration of English /s/ and its Borrowing in Korean”. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10 ed. by Noriko M. Akatsuka & Susan Strauss, 406-419. Palo Alto, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Carole Paradis. 2005. “Category Preservation and Proximity versus Phonetic Approximation in Loanword Adaptation”. Linguistic Inquiry 36:2.223-258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, Erika S. 2009. “On the Assimilation-Discrimination Relationship in American English Adults’ French Vowel Learning”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126:5.2670-2682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, Erika S. & Winifred Strange. 2008. “Perception of French Vowels by American English Adults with and without French Language Experience”. Journal of Phonetics 36:1.141-157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn E. F. & Michael Studdert-Kennedy. 1967. “On the Role of Formant Transitions in Vowel Recognition”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42:4.830-843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahalanobis, Prasanta C. 1936. “On the Generalised Distance in Statistics”. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 2, 49-55.
Manuel, Sharon. 1999. “Cross-Language Studies: Relating language-particular coarticulation patterns to other language-particular facts”. Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques ed. by William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett, 179-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Pierre. 2002. “Le système vocalique du français du Québec: De l’acoustique à la phonologie”. La Linguistique 38.71-88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Ralph. L. 1953. “Auditory Tests with Synthetic Vowels”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25:1.114-121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nearey, Terrance M. & Peter F. Assmann. 1986. “Modeling the Role of Vowel Inherent Spectral Change in Vowel Identification”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80:5.1297-1308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, Eunjin. 2002. “Fronting of Back Vowels in Coronal Contexts: A cross-language study”. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 8.239-254.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & Darlene LaCharité. 1997. “Preservation and Minimality in Loanword Adaptation”. Journal of Linguistics 33:2.379-430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, Inga Vendelin & Kimihiro Nakamura. 2008. “On the Perceptual Origin of Loanword Adaptations: Experimental evidence from Japanese”. Phonology 25:1.129-164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pols, Louis C. W., Leo J. T. van der Kamp & Reinier Plomp. 1969. “Perceptual and Physical Space of Vowel Sounds”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46:2B.458-467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, Núria. 2005. “Cross-Language Speech Perception”. The Handbook of Speech Perception ed. by David B. Pisoni & Robert E. Remez, 546-566. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & Arthur S. House. 1963. “Perturbation of Vowel Articulations by Consonantal Context: An acoustical study”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6:2.111-128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Stanley S., John Volkmann & Edwin B. Newman. 1937. “A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 8:3.185-190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, Winifred. 1989. “Dynamic Specification of Coarticulated Vowels Spoken in Sentence Context”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85:5.2135-2153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, Winifred, Erika S. Levy & Franzo F. Law. 2009. “Cross-Language Categorization of French and German Vowels by Naïve American Listeners”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126:3.1461-1476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, Winifred, Andrea Weber, Erika Levy, Valeriy Shafiro, Miwako Hisagi & Kanae Nishi. 2007. “Acoustic Variability within and across German, French, and American English Vowels: Phonetic context effects”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122:2.1111-1129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takagi, Naoyuki & Virginia Mann. 1994. “A Perceptual Basis for the Systematic Phonological Correspondences between Japanese Loan Words and their English Source Words”. Journal of Phonetics 22:4.343-356.Google Scholar
Vendelin, Inga & Sharon Peperkamp. 2006. “The Influence of Orthography on Loanword Adaptations”. Lingua 116:7.996-1007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wang, Yizhou
2023. Processing of English Coda Laterals in L2 Listeners: An Eye-Tracking Study. Language and Speech DOI logo
Wang, Yizhou, Rikke L. Bundgaard-Nielsen, Brett J. Baker & Olga Maxwell
2023. Difficulties in decoupling articulatory gestures in L2 phonemic sequences: the case of Mandarin listeners’ perceptual deletion of English post-vocalic laterals. Phonetica 80:1-2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.