Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change: Spanish across space and time
Edited by Jeremy King and Sandro Sessarego
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 340] 2018
► pp. 85–110

Chapter 4
Afro-Hispanic contact varieties at the syntax/pragmatics interface

Pro-drop phenomena in Chinchano Spanish

The Null Subject Parameter (NSP) has been the focus of much debate in the syntactic and pragmatic literature. Within the realm of Spanish and Portuguese, the analysis of two dialects that do not follow its predictions (Dominican Spanish (DS) and Brazilian Portuguese (BP)) has led to the postulation of new hypotheses to account for their unexpected syntactic patterns. The present study pays attention to yet another dialect of Spanish that does not conform to the NSP, Chinchano Spanish (CS), an Afro-Hispanic variety spoken in Chincha, Peru. In so doing, this paper provides an analysis of null and overt subjects that partially deviates from previous accounts of similar pro-drop phenomena. Additionally, this study proposes a model of contact-induced language transmission that explains why CS – as well as many other Afro-Hispanic languages of the Americas (AHLAs) – presents patterns that do not align this dialect with either null-subject languages (NSLs) like Italian or non-null-subject languages (NNSLs) like English.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The null-subject parameter (NSP)
  • 3.A look at two “partial pro-drop systems” in Romance
    • 3.1Dominican Spanish
    • 3.2Brazilian Portuguese
    • 3.3Chinchano Spanish
  • 4.The proposal: Differential specification of functional heads
  • 5. On the origin of Chincha Spanish partial pro-drop system
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.340.05ses
References (82)
References
Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2005. “Variation and the Minimalist Program”. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social ed. by Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan, 149–178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar, Mary A. Kato & Maria E. Duarte. 2005. “Null Subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese”. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4.11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, Tom G. 2006. “Minimalist Behaviorism: The Role of the Individual in Explaining Language Universals”. Language Universals ed. by Morten Christiansen, Christopher Collins & Shimon Edelman, 270–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008. “Remarks on the Individual Basis for Linguistic Structures”. Ms., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Birdsong, David. 1992. “Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition”. Language 68. 706–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2011. “Approaching Parameters from Below”. The Biolinguistics Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution of the Human Language Faculty ed. by Anna MariadiSciullo & Cedric Boeckx, 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax. Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 1999. “On Focus vs. Wh-Movement: The Case of Caribbean Spanish”. Sophia Linguistica 44–45.1–32Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José. 2006. “In Situ Focus in Caribbean Spanish”. Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium ed. by Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio, 13–23. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Syntactic Variation: The Case of Spanish and Portuguese Subjects”. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1:2415–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Null Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1993. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters”. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, vol. 1, ed. by Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework”. Step by Step ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–156. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria E. 1993. “Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: A trajetória do sujeito no português do Brazil”. Português brasileiro: Uma viagem diacrônica ed. by Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato, 107–128. Campinas: Ed. Da Unicamp.Google Scholar
1995. A perda do princípio “Evite pronome” no português brasileiro. Ph.D. dissertation, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria E. & Mary Kato. 2002. “A Diachronic Analysis of Brazilian Portuguese Wh-Questions”. Santa Barbara Portuguese Studies 6.326–340.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2008. “Variation and Morphosyntactic Theory: Competition Fractioned”. Language and Linguistics Compass 2.59–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, Florencia. 2002. “Case and φ-Feature Agreement in Advanced L2 Spanish Grammars”. EUROSLA Yearbook ed. by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Tanja Ruthenberg & Marie Louise Poschen, 71–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Grant. 2004. “On the Syntax and Processing of Wh-questions in Spanish”. Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics ed. by Benjamin Schmeiser, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher & Angelo Rodriguez, 237–250. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane & Vieri Samek-Lodovici. 1998. “Optional Subjects and Subject Universals”. Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax ed. by Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis & David Pesetsky, 192–219. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2005. Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure. London & New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Prominence Scales and Unmarked Word Order in Spanish”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25.235–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Topicalization and Preverbal Subjects in Spanish Wh-Interrogatives”. Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium ed. by Joyce Bruhn de Garavito & Elena Valenzuela, 225–236. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & Sandro Sessarego. 2014. “Morphosyntactic Variation and Gender Agreement in Three Afro-Andean Dialects”. Lingua 151.142–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. “Parametric versus Functional Explanations of Syntactic Universals”. The Limits of Syntactic Variation ed. by Teresa Biberauer & Anders Holmberg. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, Julia. 2000. The Second Time Around: Minimalism and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John A. & Peter L. Patrick, eds. 2007. Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. “Is There a Little pro? Evidence from Finnish”. Linguistic Inquiry 36.533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 1994. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: A Study with Special Reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Oswaldo. 1986. “Arbitrary Plural Pronouns”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4.43–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayaseelan, K. A. 1999. “Empty Pronoun in Dravidian”. Parametric Studies in Malayalam Syntax ed. by K.A. Jayaseelan, 14–25.New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline S. & Elissa L. Newport. 1989. “Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on Acquisition of English as a Second Language”. Cognitive Psychology 21.60–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary & Esmeralda Negrão, eds. 2000. Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt & Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1991. “Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change”. Language Variation and Change 1.199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John. 2008. Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, Cristina. 2011Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, Gita & James W. Gair. 1993. “Apparent UG Inaccessibility in SLA: Misapplied Principles or Principled Misapplications?” Confluence: Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Speech Pathology ed. by Fred R. Eckman, 79–103. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Vallejo, Catalina. 2010. “Syntactic Variation in Colombian Spanish. The Case of the Focalizing Ser (FS) Structure”. Romance Linguistics 2009: Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho, 169–186. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Modesto, Marcello. 2000. “Null Subject without ‘Rich’ Agreement”. In Kato & Negrão (2000), 147–174.Google Scholar
Montalbetti, Mario. 1984. After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2004. The Acquisition of Spanish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. Rejean Dias & Ana Thomé-Williams. 2009. “Subject Expression in the Non-Native Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese”. Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies across Portuguese ed. by Acrisio Pires & Jason Rothman, 301–325. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2004. “Against a Parameter-Setting Approach to Language Variation”. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4.181–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Antxon Olarrea. 2006. “Microvariation in Caribbean/Non-Caribbean Spanish Interrogatives”. Probus 18.59–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Santos, Iván. 2008. Projecting Subjects in Spanish and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Perl, Matthias. 1998. “Introduction”. América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas ed. by Matthias Perl & Armin Schwegler, 1–24. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Perl, Matthias & Armin Schwegler, eds. 1998. América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/ Vervuert.Google Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 2005. Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Jason Rothman. 2009. “Introduction”. Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies across Portuguese ed. by Acrisio Pires & Jason Rothman, 5–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Sara G. Thomason. 2008. “How Much Syntactic Reconstruction Is Possible?”. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 27–72. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20.365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg. 2010. “Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory”. Null Subjects: The structure of parametric variation ed. by Teresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michael Sheehan, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom. 1999. “Universal Bilingualism”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2.169–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2004. “Ellipsis and Pronominal Reference in Japanese Clefts”. Studies in Modern Grammar 36.1–44.Google Scholar
Sessarego, Sandro. 2011. Introducción al idioma afroboliviano: Una conversación con el awicho Manuel Barra. Cochabamba & La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Non-Creole Features in the Verb System of Afro-Hispanic Languages: New Insights from SLA Studies”. International Journal of Linguistics 4.146–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. “Afro-Hispanic Contact Varieties as Conventionalized Advanced Second Languages”. Iberia 5.96–122.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Chota Valley Spanish. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Afro-Peruvian Spanish in the Context of Spanish Creole Genesis”. Spanish in Context 11:3381–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Afro-Peruvian Spanish: Casting Light on the Legacy of a “Missing Spanish Creole”. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, Glaucia. 2001. Word Order in Brazilian Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2000. “Syntactic Optionality in Non-Native Grammars”. Second Language Research 16.93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Near-Nativeness”. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition ed. by Catherine Doughty & Michael Long, 130–153. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Anonella. 2004. “Native Language Attrition and Developmental Instability at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Data, Interpretations and Methods”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7.143–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1983. “proarb”. Linguistic Inquiry 14.188–191.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2003. “The Semantics of Japanese Null Pronouns and Its Cross-Linguistic Implications”. The Interfaces. Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures ed. by Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toribio, Almeida J. 1993. “Lexical Subjects in Finite and Non-Finite Clauses”. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 11.149–178.Google Scholar
2000. “Setting Parametric Limits on Dialectal Variation in Spanish”. Lingua 110.315–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, Tonjes. 2008. “Creole Genesis: The Impact of the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis”. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies ed. by Silvia Kouwenberg & John Singler, 219–241. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio. 2015. The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish: Along the Left Periphery. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 1992. “Subjacency Violations and Empty Categories in L2 Acquisition”. Island Constraints ed. by Helen Goodluck & Michael Rochemont, 445–464. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia & Alan Juffs. 1998. “Constraints on Wh-Movement in Two Different Contexts of Non-Native Language Acquisition: Competence and Processing”. The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition ed. by Suzanne Flynn, Gita Martohardjono & Wayne O’Neil, 111–129. Mahweh, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Butera, Brianna, Rajiv Rao & Sandro Sessarego
2020. Chapter 8. Afro-Peruvian Spanish intonation. In Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 28], ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Sessarego, Sandro
2020. Chapter 2. Chocó Spanish. In Hispanic Contact Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 22], ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.