Chapter published in:
Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change: Spanish across space and time
Edited by Jeremy King and Sandro Sessarego
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 340] 2018
► pp. 85–110

Afro-Hispanic contact varieties at the syntax/pragmatics interface

Pro-drop phenomena in Chinchano Spanish

| University of Texas at Austin | Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies | Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies | Foro Latinoamericano de Antropología del Derecho
| The Ohio State University
The Null Subject Parameter (NSP) has been the focus of much debate in the syntactic and pragmatic literature. Within the realm of Spanish and Portuguese, the analysis of two dialects that do not follow its predictions (Dominican Spanish (DS) and Brazilian Portuguese (BP)) has led to the postulation of new hypotheses to account for their unexpected syntactic patterns. The present study pays attention to yet another dialect of Spanish that does not conform to the NSP, Chinchano Spanish (CS), an Afro-Hispanic variety spoken in Chincha, Peru. In so doing, this paper provides an analysis of null and overt subjects that partially deviates from previous accounts of similar pro-drop phenomena. Additionally, this study proposes a model of contact-induced language transmission that explains why CS – as well as many other Afro-Hispanic languages of the Americas (AHLAs) – presents patterns that do not align this dialect with either null-subject languages (NSLs) like Italian or non-null-subject languages (NNSLs) like English.
Published online: 13 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.340.05ses
References

References

Adger, David & Jennifer Smith
2005 “Variation and the Minimalist Program”. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social ed. by Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan, 149–178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
2008 The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar, Mary A. Kato & Maria E. Duarte
2005 “Null Subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese”. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4.11–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bever, Tom G.
2006 “Minimalist Behaviorism: The Role of the Individual in Explaining Language Universals”. Language Universals ed. by Morten Christiansen, Christopher Collins & Shimon Edelman, 270–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 “Remarks on the Individual Basis for Linguistic Structures”. Ms., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Birdsong, David
1992 “Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition”. Language 68. 706–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2011 “Approaching Parameters from Below”. The Biolinguistics Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution of the Human Language Faculty ed. by Anna MariadiSciullo & Cedric Boeckx, 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric Syntax. Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
1999 “On Focus vs. Wh-Movement: The Case of Caribbean Spanish”. Sophia Linguistica 44–45.1–32Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José
2006 “In Situ Focus in Caribbean Spanish”. Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium ed. by Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio, 13–23. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
2008 “Syntactic Variation: The Case of Spanish and Portuguese Subjects”. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1:2415–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Null Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik
1993 “The Theory of Principles and Parameters”. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, vol. 1, ed. by Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework”. Step by Step ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–156. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by Phase”. Ken Hale: A Life in Language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria E.
1993 “Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: A trajetória do sujeito no português do Brazil”. Português brasileiro: Uma viagem diacrônica ed. by Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato, 107–128. Campinas: Ed. Da Unicamp.Google Scholar
1995 A perda do princípio “Evite pronome” no português brasileiro. Ph.D. dissertation, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria E. & Mary Kato
2002 “A Diachronic Analysis of Brazilian Portuguese Wh-Questions”. Santa Barbara Portuguese Studies 6.326–340.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2008 “Variation and Morphosyntactic Theory: Competition Fractioned”. Language and Linguistics Compass 2.59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, Florencia
2002 “Case and φ-Feature Agreement in Advanced L2 Spanish Grammars”. EUROSLA Yearbook ed. by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Tanja Ruthenberg & Marie Louise Poschen, 71–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Grant
2004 “On the Syntax and Processing of Wh-questions in Spanish”. Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics ed. by Benjamin Schmeiser, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher & Angelo Rodriguez, 237–250. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane & Vieri Samek-Lodovici
1998 “Optional Subjects and Subject Universals”. Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax ed. by Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis & David Pesetsky, 192–219. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2005 Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure. London & New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
2007 “Prominence Scales and Unmarked Word Order in Spanish”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25.235–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Topicalization and Preverbal Subjects in Spanish Wh-Interrogatives”. Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium ed. by Joyce Bruhn de Garavito & Elena Valenzuela, 225–236. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & Sandro Sessarego
2014 “Morphosyntactic Variation and Gender Agreement in Three Afro-Andean Dialects”. Lingua 151.142–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006 “Parametric versus Functional Explanations of Syntactic Universals”. The Limits of Syntactic Variation ed. by Teresa Biberauer & Anders Holmberg. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, Julia
2000  The Second Time Around: Minimalism and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holm, John A. & Peter L. Patrick
eds. 2007 Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2005 “Is There a Little pro? Evidence from Finnish”. Linguistic Inquiry 36.533–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
1994 The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: A Study with Special Reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Oswaldo
1986 “Arbitrary Plural Pronouns”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4.43–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jayaseelan, K. A.
1999 “Empty Pronoun in Dravidian”. Parametric Studies in Malayalam Syntax ed. by K.A. Jayaseelan, 14–25.New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline S. & Elissa L. Newport
1989 “Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on Acquisition of English as a Second Language”. Cognitive Psychology 21.60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary & Esmeralda Negrão
eds. 2000 Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt & Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1991 “Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change”. Language Variation and Change 1.199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John
2008 Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, Cristina
2011Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, Gita & James W. Gair
1993 “Apparent UG Inaccessibility in SLA: Misapplied Principles or Principled Misapplications?” Confluence: Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Speech Pathology ed. by Fred R. Eckman, 79–103. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Vallejo, Catalina
2010 “Syntactic Variation in Colombian Spanish. The Case of the Focalizing Ser (FS) Structure”. Romance Linguistics 2009: Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho, 169–186. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, Marcello
2000 “Null Subject without ‘Rich’ Agreement”. In Kato & Negrão (2000), 147–174.Google Scholar
Montalbetti, Mario
1984 After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina
2004 The Acquisition of Spanish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. Rejean Dias & Ana Thomé-Williams
2009 “Subject Expression in the Non-Native Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese”. Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies across Portuguese ed. by Acrisio Pires & Jason Rothman, 301–325. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
2004 “Against a Parameter-Setting Approach to Language Variation”. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4.181–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Antxon Olarrea
2006 “Microvariation in Caribbean/Non-Caribbean Spanish Interrogatives”. Probus 18.59–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Santos, Iván
2008 Projecting Subjects in Spanish and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Perl, Matthias
1998 “Introduction”. América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas ed. by Matthias Perl & Armin Schwegler, 1–24. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Perl, Matthias & Armin Schwegler
eds. 1998 América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/ Vervuert.Google Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred
1998 Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ed. 2005 Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Jason Rothman
2009 “Introduction”. Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies across Portuguese ed. by Acrisio Pires & Jason Rothman, 5–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Sara G. Thomason
2008 “How Much Syntactic Reconstruction Is Possible?”. Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 27–72. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag
1994 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20.365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993 Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg
2010 “Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory”. Null Subjects: The structure of parametric variation ed. by Teresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michael Sheehan, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom
1999 “Universal Bilingualism”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2.169–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru
2004 “Ellipsis and Pronominal Reference in Japanese Clefts”. Studies in Modern Grammar 36.1–44.Google Scholar
Sessarego, Sandro
2011 Introducción al idioma afroboliviano: Una conversación con el awicho Manuel Barra. Cochabamba & La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
2012 “Non-Creole Features in the Verb System of Afro-Hispanic Languages: New Insights from SLA Studies”. International Journal of Linguistics 4.146–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Afro-Hispanic Contact Varieties as Conventionalized Advanced Second Languages”. Iberia 5.96–122.Google Scholar
2013b Chota Valley Spanish. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
2014 “Afro-Peruvian Spanish in the Context of Spanish Creole Genesis”. Spanish in Context 11:3381–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Afro-Peruvian Spanish: Casting Light on the Legacy of a “Missing Spanish Creole”. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Glaucia
2001 Word Order in Brazilian Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2000 “Syntactic Optionality in Non-Native Grammars”. Second Language Research 16.93–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Near-Nativeness”. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition ed. by Catherine Doughty & Michael Long, 130–153. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Anonella
2004 “Native Language Attrition and Developmental Instability at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Data, Interpretations and Methods”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7.143–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
1983 “proarb”. Linguistic Inquiry 14.188–191.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi
2003 “The Semantics of Japanese Null Pronouns and Its Cross-Linguistic Implications”. The Interfaces. Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures ed. by Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toribio, Almeida J.
1993 “Lexical Subjects in Finite and Non-Finite Clauses”. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 11.149–178.Google Scholar
2000 “Setting Parametric Limits on Dialectal Variation in Spanish”. Lingua 110.315–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veenstra, Tonjes
2008 “Creole Genesis: The Impact of the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis”. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies ed. by Silvia Kouwenberg & John Singler, 219–241. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio
2015 The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish: Along the Left Periphery. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
White, Lydia
1992 “Subjacency Violations and Empty Categories in L2 Acquisition”. Island Constraints ed. by Helen Goodluck & Michael Rochemont, 445–464. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia & Alan Juffs
1998 “Constraints on Wh-Movement in Two Different Contexts of Non-Native Language Acquisition: Competence and Processing”. The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition ed. by Suzanne Flynn, Gita Martohardjono & Wayne O’Neil, 111–129. Mahweh, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2002 Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Butera, Brianna, Rajiv Rao & Sandro Sessarego
2020.  In Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 28], ► pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Sessarego, Sandro
2020.  In Hispanic Contact Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 22], ► pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.