Cover not available
Part of
The Diachrony of Classification Systems
Edited by William B. McGregor and Søren Wichmann
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 342] 2018
► pp. 165–200

The diachrony of Oceanic possessive classifiers

With just a small number of exceptions, Oceanic languages have multiple types of attributive possessive constructions that involve a more or less elaborate system of possessive classifiers. Constructions with possessive classifiers usually serve to express alienable possession. A different construction type, one that does not involve possessive classifiers, is typically used to express inalienable possession. Proto-Oceanic had three possessive classifiers. In some present-day languages the original system of classifiers has been expanded considerably, while in some others it has been reduced or eliminated altogether. In some languages possessive classifiers exist alongside numeral classifiers, but the two systems operate on different principles. The paper investigates the system of possessive constructions in Proto-Oceanic, its emergence and its subsequent developments. It also critically assesses the claim that the Oceanic system with different constructions to express alienable and inalienable possession is the result of contact with Papuan (non-Austronesian) languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The typical Oceanic pattern of attributive possessive constructions
  • 3.The diachrony of the possessive classifiers systems within Oceanic
    • 3.1The Proto-Oceanic possessive system
    • 3.2Reductions and expansions in Oceanic possessive systems
    • 3.3The Polynesian pattern
    • 3.4Possessive constructions in Oceanic: A brief summary
  • 4.Multiple possessive constructions in non-Oceanic Austronesian languages
  • 5.Multiple possessive constructions in Papuan languages
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.342.07lic
References (57)
References
Benton, Richard A. 1968. “Numeral and Attributive Classifiers in Trukese”. Oceanic Linguistics 7.104–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert A. 1977. “A Rediscovered Austronesian Comparative Paradigm”. Oceanic Linguistics 16.1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983/1984. “More on the Position of the Languages of Eastern Indonesia”. Oceanic Linguistics 22/23.1–28.Google Scholar
2005. “Review of The Oceanic Languages by John Lynch, Malcom Ross and Terry Crowley”. Oceanic Linguistics 44.544–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brownie, John & Marjo Brownie. 2007. Mussau Grammar Essentials. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: SIL-PNG Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Buse, Jasper (with Raututi Taringa). 1996. Cook Islands Maori Dictionary with English-Cook Islands Maori Finderlist, ed. by Bruce Biggs & Rangi Moeka‘a.Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Clark, Ross. 2000. “Possessive Markers in Polynesian Languages”. Possessive Markers in Central Pacific Languages. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, Language Typology and Universals ed. by Steven R. Fischer, 258–268.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1985. “Common Noun Phrase Marking in Proto-Oceanic”. Oceanic Linguistics 24.135–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Southeast Ambrym”. The Oceanic Languages ed. by John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley, 660–670. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2002. “Tobati”. The Oceanic Languages ed. by John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley, 186–203. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Antoinette Schapper. 2008. “Whence the Austronesian Indirect Possession Construction?” Oceanic Linguistics 47.316–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Steven R., ed. 2000. Possessive Markers in Central Pacific Languages. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, Language Typology and Universals.Google Scholar
François, Alexander. 2002. Araki: A disappearing language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. “How Does a Language Acquire Gender Markers?” Universals of Human Language, Vol. III: Word structure ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunley, Keith, Michael Dunn, Eva Lindström, Ger Reesink, Angella Terrill, Meghan E. Healy, George Koki, Françoise R. Friedlaender & Jonathan S. Friedlaender. 2008. “Genetic and Linguistic Coevolution in Northern Island Melanesia”. PLoS Genetics 4(10).e1000239. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Catriona. 2001. The Lolovoli Dialect of the North-East Ambae Language, Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jauncey, Dorothy. 2002. “Tamabo”. The Oceanic Languages ed. by John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley, 608–625. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian, Ger Reesink & Miriam van Staden. 2008. “East Nusantara as a Linguistic Area”. From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics ed. by Pieter Muysken, 95–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
La Fontinelle, Jacqueline de. 1976. La langue de Houaïlou (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Description phonologique et description syntaxique. Paris: Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Laidig, Wyn D. 1993. “Insights from Larike Possessive Constructions”. Oceanic Linguistics 32.311–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Kee-dong (with Lyndon Cornelius & Elmer Asher). 1975. Kusaiean Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1983a. A Grammar of Manam. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1983b. “Relational Classifiers”. Lingua 60.147–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. “Possessive Constructions in Oceanic Languages and in Proto-Oceanic”. Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress ed.by Andrew Pawley & Lois Carrington, 93–140. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A Grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. “Oceanic Possessive Classifiers”. Oceanic Linguistics 48.379–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. “Attributive Possessive Constructions in Oceanic”. The Expression of Possession ed. by William B. McGregor, 249–292. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “The Rise and Demise of Possessive Classifiers in Austronesian”. Historical Linguistics 2011: Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011 ed. by Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid, 199–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek, Jyotsna Vaid & Hsin-Chin Chen. 2011. “On the Interpretation of Alienable vs. Inalienable Possession: A psycholinguistic investigation”. Cognitive Linguistics 22.659–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lum, J. Koji & Rebecca L. Cann. 1998. “mtDNA and Language Support a Common Origin of Micronesians and Polynesians in Island Southeast Asia”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105.109–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lum, J. Koji, Lynn B. Jorde & Wulf Schiefenhovel. 2002. “Affinities among Melanesians, Micronesians, and Polynesians: A neutral, biparental genetic perspective”. Human Biology 74.413–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John. 1973. “Verbal Aspects of Possession in Melanesian Languages”. Oceanic Linguistics 12.69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000a. A Grammar of Anejom̃. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2000b. “Historical Overview of Central Pacific Possessive Markers”. Possessive Markers in Central Pacific Languages. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, Language Typology and Universals ed. by Steven R. Fischer, 233–242.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Passive and Food Possession in Oceanic Languages”. The Boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton ed. by Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross & Darrell Tryon, 193–214. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley. 2002. The Oceanic Languages. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Milner, George B. 1972. Fijian Grammar (3rd edn.). Suva: Government Press.Google Scholar
Mulder de, Walter & Anne Carlier. 2011. The Grammaticalization of Definite Articles. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 522–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osmond, Meredith. 1998. “Horticultural practices”. The Lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, Vol. I: Material cultureed. by Malcolm Ross, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond, 115–142. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise. 1976. Le iaai: Langue mélanésienne d’Ouvéa (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Phonologie, morphologie, esquisse syntaxique. Paris: Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill & Dunstan Brown. 2007. “Heads in Oceanic Indirect Possession”. Oceanic Linguistics 46.199–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1973. “Some Problems in Proto-Oceanic Grammar”. Oceanic Linguistics 12.103–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “The Meaning(s) of Proto Oceanic *panua”. A Polymath Anthropologist: Essays in honour of Ann Chowning ed. by Claudia Gross, Harriet D. Lyons & Dorothy A. Counts, 211–223 (= Research in Anthropology and Linguistics, 6). Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Origins of Early Lapita Culture: The testimony of historical linguistics”. Oceanic Explorations: Lapita and western Pacific settlement ed. by Stuart Bedford, Christophe Sand & Sean P. Connaughton, 17–49. Canberra: ANU ePress.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Timoci Sayaba. 1990. “Possessive-Marking in Wayan, a Western Fijian Language: Noun class or relational system?” Pacific Island Languages: Essays in Honour of G. B. Milner ed. by Jeremy H. C. S. Davidson, 147–171. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; and Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Rehg, Kenneth L. (with Damian G. Sohl). 1981. Ponapean Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2002. “Mussau”. The Oceanic Languages ed. by John Lynch, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley, 148–166. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Calquing and Metatypy”. Journal of Language Contact – THEMA 1.116–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond, eds. 2011. The Lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, Vol. IV: Animals. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. “Types of Loan: Matter and pattern”. Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-linguistic Perspective ed. by Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel, 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schütz, Albert J. 1985. The Fijian Language. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min & Bryon W. Bender. 1973. A Ulithian Grammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, René. 2009. “Possession in South Halmahera–West New Guinea: Typology and reconstruction”. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust ed. by Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley, 327–357. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Williams, Herbert W. 1971. A Dictionary of the Maori Language (7th edn., revised and augmented by the Advisory Committee on the Teaching of the Maori Language, Department of Education). Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Wilson, William H. 1982. Proto-Polynesian Possessive Marking. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cristofaro, Sonia
2023. Explaining alienability splits in the use of overt and zero possessive marking: a source-oriented approach. Linguistics 61:6 ► pp. 1613 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.