Part of
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 205231
References (73)
Old Italian sources
Ascanio De’ Mori, Novelle = Parabosco, Girolamo. 1832. Raccolta di novellieri italiani, vol. 3. 1: 945. Florence: Tipografia Borghi & Compagni.Google Scholar
Bonvesin = Contini, Gianfranco. 1937 (ed.). Cinque Volgari di Bonvesin de la Riva. Modena: Società Tipografica Modenese (Second half of the 13th century, Lombard: Milanese).Google Scholar
Caternu = Rinaldi, Gaetana M. 1989. Il <<Caternu>> dell'Abate Angelo Senisio. L'Amministrazione del Monastero di San Martino delle Scale dal 1371 al 1381. Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani.Google Scholar
Cronica degli imperadori = Ceruti, Antonio. 1878 (ed.). Cronica degli imperadori. Archivio Glottologico Italiano Vol. 3: 177–243 1301,VenetianGoogle Scholar
Decameron = Branca, Vittore. 1976 (ed.). Giovanni Boccaccio, Decameron . Florence: Accademia della Crusca (1370, Florentine).Google Scholar
Leggenda di messer Gianni di = Cappelli, Andrea. 1861. Leggenda di messer Gianni di Procida (Giovanni di Procida e il Vespro siciliano). In Miscellanea di opuscoli inediti e rari dei secoli XIV e XV, vol. I, 43–68. Turin: Unione Tipografico-EditriceGoogle Scholar
Metamorfosi d'Ovidio = Basi, Casimiro & Guasti, Cesare. 1848 (eds.). Cinque altri libri delle Metamorfosi d'Ovidio volgarizzate da ser Arrigo Simintendi da Prato (libri VI-XV), vol. II. Prato, per Ranieri Guasti (Tuscan, 1333).
Il Novellino = Conte, Alberto. 2001 (ed.). Il Novellino. Roma: Salerno (End of the 13th century, 1281–1300).Google Scholar
Passione = Salvioni, Carlo. 1886 (ed.). La Passione e altre antiche scritture lombarde. Archivio Glottologico Italiano Vol. 9: 1–22. (15th century, Lombard (Comasco).Google Scholar
Pistole di Seneca = Bottari, Giovanni. 1717 (ed.). Volgarizzamento delle Pistole di Seneca e del Trattato della Provvidenza di Dio . Florence: Tartini & Franchi (1325?, Florentine).Google Scholar
Straparola = Pastore Stocchi, Manlio. 1979 (ed.). Giovan Francesco Straparola, Le piacevoli notti, vol. 1, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Stussi, Alfredo. 1965 (ed.). Testi Veneziani del Duecento e del Trecento. Pisa: Nistri-Lischi.Google Scholar
Tavola Ritonda = Polidori, Filippo L.1864 (ed.).La Tavola Ritonda o l'Istoria di Tristano. Bologna: Romagnoli (1350, Florentine).Google Scholar
Trecentonovelle=Pernicone, Vincenzo.1946. Sacchetti, Il Trecentonovelle. Firenze: Sansoni (1400, Florentine) Sposizione del Vangelo Secondo Matteo = Palumbo, Pietro. 1954 (ed.). Sposizione del Vangelo della Passione secondo Matteo, vols. I–II. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
Villani, Cronica = Porta, Giovanni. 1990/91. Giovanni Villani, Nuova Cronaca. Parma: Fondazione Pietro Bembo/Ugo Guanda Editore (1348, Florentine).Google Scholar
References
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2015. The morphosyntax of transitions. A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald Alexandra, Y. 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alsina, Alex, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.). 1997. Complex predicates. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ambrosini, Riccardo. 2000. Sulla sintassi del verbo nella prosa toscana del Dugento ovvero tempo e aspetto nell'italiano antico. Lingua e Stile 35.4: 121–146.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress, 226–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23. 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Grammaticalization in a speaker-oriented theory of change. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers. 11–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella. 1980. Studi sulla diatesi passiva in testi italiani antichi. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor – the perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In María J. López & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization, 55–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization and linguistic typology. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), 105–117.
Bowern, Claire. 2008. The diachrony of complex predicates. Diachronica 25. 161–185.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 1997. Complex predicates in Urdu. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), 107–149.
. 2003. The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 1–49.Google Scholar
. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker, & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri. 2003. Historical stability vs. historical change. MS: University of Konstanz.
. 2013. Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua 135. 7–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 2003. Perifrasi passive in testi non toscani delle origini. In Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds.), Italia linguistica anno Mille, Italia linguistica anno Duemila, Atti del XXXIV Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Florence, 18–20 October 2000), 105–127. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2005. Passive auxiliaries in Late Latin. In Sándor Kiss & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Festschrift Herman, 179–196. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2006. The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology, 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Auxiliaries and serials between Late Latin and early Romance. In Delia Bentley & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), Sui dialetti italoromanzi. Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent, The Italianist, Special supplement 1. 63–87.Google Scholar
. 2016. Voice. In Martin Maiden & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 967–980. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1987. Copula auxiliarization: how and why? In Martin Harris & Palo Ramat (eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, 54–84. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 2000. Some grammaticalization patterns for auxiliaries. In John C. Smith & Delia Bentley (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1995, vol. 1, 125–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò. 2014. Venire (‘come’) as a passive auxiliary in Italian. In Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.), Come and go off the beaten grammaticalization path, 21–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type, Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Universität zu Köln. (Arbeitspapiere N.F. 5).Google Scholar
. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14: 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. On S, A, P, T and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15. 535–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The Social verb construction: comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17.291–319.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Brian Joseph & Robert D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 576–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2011. The areal dimension of grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), 291–301.
Heltoft, Lars. 2017. The regrammation of paradigms: The development of auxiliaries in Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49. 255–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hook, Peter E. 1974. The Compound Verb in Hindi. Ann Arbor: Centre for South and Southeast Asian Studies: The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E. 1991. The emergence of perfective aspect in Indo-Aryan languages. In Elisabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. Vol. II, 59–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kontzi, Reinhold. 1958. Der Ausdruck der Passividee im älteren Italienischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kragh, Kirsten Jeppesen & Lene Schøsler. 2015. Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French. Journal of French Language Studies 25. 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
La Fauci, Nunzio. 2000. Modularità della diatesi: convergenze e divergenze grammaticali nel passivo. In Fabiana Fusco, Vincenzo Orioles & Alice Parmeggiani (eds.), Processi di convergenza e differenziazione nelle lingue dell'Europa medievale e moderna, 73–97. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano, Tübingen: Niemayer. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 2nd revis. edn. Erfurt: Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, Einar. 1938/39. Lateinisch-Griechisches und Lateinisch-Romanisches. Studia Neophilologica 11. 173–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1995. A linguistic history of Italian. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne. 1998. Antikausativ als Brücke zum Passiv: fieri, venire und se im Vulgärlateinische und Altitalienischen. In Wolfgang Dahmen, Günter Holtus, Johannes Kramer, Michael Metzeltin & Otto Winkelmann (eds.), Neuere Beschreibungsmethoden der Syntax romanischen Sprachen, Tübingen: Narr, 69–98.Google Scholar
Muller, Henri F. 1924. The passive voice in vulgar Latin. Romanic Review 15. 68–93.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine. 2011 (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osam, E. Keku. 2004. An introduction to the structure of Akan: its verbal and multiverbal systems. Legon: (Ghana) Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax. Vol. I: The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol. 1997. Auxiliation and serialization: on discerning the difference. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), 175–202.
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2010. La realizzazione della struttura argomentale. In Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell'italiano antico, 122–189. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Seiss, Melanie. 2009. On the difference between auxiliaries, serial verbs and light verbs. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG09 conference. Stanford: CSLI, 501–519.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2003. La grammaticalizzazione di <venire + participio> in italiano: anticausativo o Risultativo?. In Claus D. Pusch & Andreas Wesch (eds.), Verbalperiphrasen in den (ibero-)romanischen Sprachen. Hamburg: Buske, 23–34.Google Scholar
Svennung, Josef. 1935. Untersuchungen zu Palladius und zur Lateinischen Fach- und Volkssprache . Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1987. The interaction between periphrases and inflection: Some Romance examples. In Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, 237–256.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo
Winters, Margaret. 1985. Steps towards the romance passive inferrable from the Itinerarium Egeriae . Romance Philology 37: 445–454.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan
2021. The passive voice in ancient Indo-European languages: inflection, derivation, periphrastic verb forms. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Cennamo, Michela
2020. The actualization of new voice patterns in Romance. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.