Part of
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 253270
References
Adrianova-Peretc, Varvara Pavlovna
1948Zadonščina (Opyt rekonstrukcii avtorskogo teksta). Trudy otdela drevnerusskoj literatury VI Moskva/Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 201–253.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning
2001Actualization and the (Uni)Directionality of Change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization. Linguistic Change in Progress (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Volume Vol. 219), 225–249. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Avanesov, Ruben Ivanovič & Varvara Georgievna Orlova
1964Russkaja dialektologija. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Bjørnflaten, Jan Ivar
1998Exploring the Land and Language of Pskovia. Kalbytora (Slavistica Vilnensis Vol. 46(2). 165–185.Google Scholar
2012The Slavic Gerund and Its Development in Russian. In Andriy Danylenko & Serhii Vakulenko (eds.), Gedenkschrift für George Y. Shevelov. Studien zu Sprache, Literatur und Kultur bei den Slaven (Die Welt der Slaven Sammelbände, Vol. Band 42), 62–78. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2016The perfect from a cross-linguistic perspective in old east Slavic texts. Slavia. Časopis pro slovanskou filologii 4(3). 259–267.Google Scholar
Boudovskaia, Elena
2017Past tense in the Rusyn dialect of Novoselycja: Auxiliary vs. subject pronoun as first- and second-person subject. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25(1). 3–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2007Deconstructing Categories: Finiteness in a Functional-Typological Perspective. In I. Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical foundations, 91–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gorškova, Klavdija Vasilʼevna & Georgij Alekandrovič Chaburgaev
1981Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: «Vysšaja škola».Google Scholar
Dimitrieva, L. K
1962K voprosu o značenii i genezise otpričastnych form (na materiale sovremennych pskovskich govorov i pskovskich letopisej). In B. A. Larin (ed.), Pskovskie govory I, 143–161. Pskov: Pskovskaja oblastnaja tipografija.Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget
2003Areal factors in the development of the European periphrastic perfect. Word 57(1). 1–38.Google Scholar
2013Sources of auxiliation in the perfects of Europe, Studies in Language 37(3). 599–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax. An introduction. Vol. II. Amsterda: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grabmüller, H.-J
1975Die Pskover Chroniken. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2006The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, H.
2014Conditioning Factors in the Development of the -vši Perfect in West Russian’. In Seržant & Wiemer (eds.), 195–215.
Kiparsky, V.
1967 Russische historische Grammatik. Band II. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kuz'mina, I. B. & E. B. Nemčenko
1982Istorija pričastij. In: Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Morfologija. Glagol. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
LL
: 1997Lavrent'evskaja letopis'. Polnoe sobranie russkich letopisej. Tom pervyj. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury.Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij Sergeevič
1984K voprosu o proischoždenii posessivnogo perfekta. In: Očerki po aspektologii. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo leningradskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Múcsková, G.
2016Jazykové zmeny v historickom vývine gramatických tvarov z aspektu gramatikalizácie (na príklade vývinu slovenského préterita). Bratislava: Universita Komenského v Bratislave.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1988Topology of Resultative constructions. John Benjamin, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obnorskij, Sergej Petrovič & Stepan Grigorevič Barchudarov
1938Chrestomatija po istorii russkogo jazyka. Čast’ pervaja. Leningrad/Moskva: Učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel'stvo.Google Scholar
Obnorskij, Sergej Petrovič
1953Očerki po morfologii russkogo glagola. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Obrazovanie
: 1970Obrazovanie severorusskogo narečija i srednerusskich govorov. Otv. red. V. G. Orlova. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo „Nauka”.Google Scholar
PL-1: Pskovskie letopisi. Vypusk pervyj
: 1941, Prigotovil k pečati Arsenij Nikolaevič Nasonov. Moskva/ Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.
PL-2: Pskovskie letopisi. Vypusk vtoroj
: 1955, Pod redakciej A. N. Nasonova. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.
Potebnja, Aleksandr Afanasʼevič
1958Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike. Tom I-II. Moskva: „Prosveščenie”.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A. & Björn Wiemer
(eds.) 2014Contemporary Approaches to Dialectology. The Area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian Dialects. Slavica Bergensia Vol. 12, Bergen.Google Scholar
Skačedubova, Marija Vadimovna
2017K interpretacii slučaev upotreblenija -l‑ formy bez svjazki (na materiale Ipat'evskoj letopisi), Slavistična revija 2017(1). 115–125.Google Scholar
Stojkov, Stojko
1967Banatskijat govor. Trudove po bălgarska dialektologija. Kniga treta. Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite.Google Scholar
Tommola, Hannu
2000On the perfect in North Slavic. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2000On the perfect in North Slavic. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Trubinskij, Valentin Ivanovič
1962Oleksičeskom baze predikativnogo deepričastija v pskovskich govorach. In B.A, Larin (ed.), Pskovskie govory I, 162–201Pskov: Pskovskaja oblastnaja tipografija.Google Scholar
1984Očerki russkogo dialektnogo sintaksisa. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo leningradskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Vasilev, Christo
1968Der romanische Perfekttyp im slavischen. In Erwin Koschmieder & Maximilian Braun (ed.), Slavistische Studien zum VI. Internationalen Slavistenkongress in Prag 1968, 215–230. München: Trofenik.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Markus Giger
2005Resultativa in den nordslavischen und baltischen Sprachen. Bestandsaufnahme under arealen und grammatikalisierungstheoretischen Gesichtspunkten. Lincom Studies in Language Typology Vol. 10. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar