Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 345356
References

References

Andersen, Henning
1968IE *s after i, u, r, k in Baltic and Slavic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 11:2. 171–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1969Lenition in Common Slavic. Language 45. 554–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973Abductive and deductive change. Language 49. 765–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Center and periphery: Adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Historical dialectology: Regional and local, ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Reconstructing prehistorical dialects: Initial vowels in Slavic and Baltic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999The western South Slavic contrast Sn. sah-ni-ti // SC sah-nu-ti . Slovenski jezik / Slovene Linguistic Studies 2, 247–262.Google Scholar
2001Markedness and the theory of language change. In Actualization, ed. by Henning Andersen, 21–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Slavic and the Indo-European migrations. In Language contacts in prehistory: Studies in stratigraphy, ed. by Henning Andersen, 45–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier-Marco, Valentina Bianchi, Östen Dahl, and Mario Squartini
(eds) 1995Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1997Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, ed. by Geert Booij and Jakop van Marle, 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1997Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua 102. 115–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert E.
2008Paradigmatic morphology. In La raison morphologique. Hommage á la mémoire de Danielle Corbin, ed. by Bernard Fradin, 29–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville
2007Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83:1. 8–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3:2. 141–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2015Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91:1. 145–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2012Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1991Thematic protoroles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966Language universals with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2012The monotonicity hypothesis. In Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, ed. by Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally, 139–161. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson, and Jonathan Barnes
2004Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8:2.149–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans and Aditi Lahiri
2015Macroscopic and microscopic typology: Basic Valence Orientation, more pertinacious than meets the naked eye. Linguistic Typology 19. 11–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1991The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
2014Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, ed. by Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer, 354–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2006Some universals of verb semantics. In Linguistic Universals, ed. by Ricardo Mairal and Juana Gil. 155–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar