Changes of tense and modality in Late Mediaeval Slovene
Transference, extension or both?
The paper analyses the typology of change processes proposed by Andersen (2001, 2006) by minutely investigating semantic and pragmatic properties of temporal categories in the earliest Slovene texts, which emerged under German cultural influence, but preserved primacy of system-motivated developments.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Slovene between the Freising fragments and the Rateče manuscript
- 2.1The past tenses in the Freising fragments
- 2.2The Rateče manuscript
- 3.Trubar’s Catechismus 1550: How much did Luther’s Catechismus influence Trubar’s Slovene
- 4.Conclusions
-
Abbreviations
-
Notes
-
References
References (30)
References
Andersen, Henning. 2013. On the origin of the Slavic aspects: Imperfect and aorist. In Laura A. Janda & Tore Nesset (eds.), Aspect in Slavic: Creating time, creating grammar. Special issue of Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21. 17–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barentsen, Adrian. 1998. Priznak «sekventnaja svjaz'» i vidovoe protivopostavlenie v russkom jazyke [The feature 'sequential connection' and the aspectual opposition in Russian]. In M. Ju. Čertkova (ed.), Tipologija vida. Problemy, poiski, rešenija, 43–58. Moskva: Škola «Jazyki russkoj kul'tury».![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Tense. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dentler, Sigrid. 1997. Zur Perfekterneuerung im Mittelhochdeutschen. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickey, Stephen M. 2000. Parameters of Slavic aspect: A cognitive approach. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drinka, Bridget. 2017. Language contact in Europe. The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckhoff, Hanne M. & Laura A. Janda. 2013. Grammatical aspect and profiling in Old Church Slavonic. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2). 231–258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Hanna, 2016. Präteritumschwund im Deutschen. Dissertation. Universität Marburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grafenauer, 1958. Celovški rokopis iz Rateč [The Celovec manuscript from Rateče]. Rasprave SAZU 2(3). 5–63.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 1989. O akcentu i vokalskom kvalitetu u Brižinskim spomenicima. Slavistična revija 37. 39–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 2012. Perfective and imperfective aspect. In Robert L. Binnich (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 781–802. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 2016. Aspects of Indo-European historical syntax in a typological perspective. Slovo a slovesnost 77. 416–434.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holzer, Georg. 1986. Die Reflexe des hinteren Nasalvokals *ǫ in den Freisinger Denkmälern. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 32. 29–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ivanov, Vjačeslav V. 1964. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka [Historical grammar of Russian]. Moskva: Nauka.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ivanov, Valerij V. 1982. Istorija vremennyx form glagola [History of the temporal verb forms]. In Ruben I. Avanesov & V. V. Ivanov, Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka, 25–131. Moskva: Nauka.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman. 1956. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Repr. In Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Selected writings II: Morphological studies, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Aspect and event structure in Vedic. In: Yearbook of South Asian languages and Linguistics, 1–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1975. Jers and nasal vowels in the Freising fragments. Slavistična revija 23. 405–412.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krvina, Domen. 2015. Glagolski vid v sodobni slovenščini [The verbal aspect in contemporary Slovene]. Doktorska disertacija. Ljubljana: Filozofska Fakulteta.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maslov, Ju. S. 1948. Vid i leksičeskoe značenie glagola v sovremennom russkomliteraturnom jazyke [Aspect and the lexical meaning oft he verb in contemporary literaryRussian]. Izvestija Akademii nauk SSSR–Otdelenie literatury i jazyka 7(4). 303–316. Moscow.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merše, Majda. 1995. Vid in vrstnost glagola v slovenskem knjižnem jeziku 16. stoletja. [Aspect and Aktionsart in the Slovene literary language of the 16th century]. Ljubljana: SAZU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 1995. Le problème du préverbe en indoeuropéen. In André Rousseau (ed.), Les préverbes dans les langues d’Europe: Introduction à l’étude de la préverbation, 35–59. Lille: Septentrion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramovš, Fran and Milko Kos. 1937. Brižinski spomeniki [Freising fragments]. Ljubljana: SAZU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Collier – MacMillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schaeken, Jos. 1987. Die Akzentzeichen im 1. Freisinger Denkmal. Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie
47. 346–351.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solms, Hans-Joachim. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie des frühneuhochdeutschen Verbs. Dissertation (Universität Halle-Witemberg).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodhouse, Robert. 2008. The dual reflexes of Proto-Slavic *ǫ in the Freising Texts. Indogermanische Forschungen 113. 299–311. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gvozdanović, Jadranka
2020.
Introduction.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2
► pp. 153 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.