Chapter published in:
Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 934
Adamczyk, Elżbieta
(2010) Morphological reanalysis and the Old English u-declension. Anglia. Zeitschrift für englische Philologie, 128(3), 365–390.Google Scholar
(2018) Reshaping of the Nominal Inflection in Early Northern West Germanic. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bammesberger, Alfred
(1990) Morphologie des Urgermanischen Nomens. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bertacca, Antonio
(2009) Natural Morphology and the Loss of Nominal Inflections in English. Pisa: Plus-Piza University Press.Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk
(1995) The Germanic ‘Auslautgesetze’. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P.
(2004) Inflection Classes and Economy. In Gereon Müller, Lutz Gunkel, & Gisela Zifonun, (Eds.), Explorations in Nominal Inflection, 41–85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Karl
(1965) Altenglische Grammatik, 3rd ed, Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
(1985) Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5), 425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: consequences for the nature of constructions. In Joan Bybee, & Michael Noonan (Eds.), Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 1–17. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2003) Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency. In Brian D. Joseph, & Richard Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Frequency of Use and the Organisation of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann, & Graeme Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair
(1977) Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
(1994) Inflection Classes, Gender and the Principle of Contrast. Language 70, 737–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville, Hippisley, Andrew, Brown, Dunstan, & Marriott, Paul
(2001) Frequency, Regularity and the Paradigm: A Perspective from Russian on a Complex Relation. In Joan Bybee, & Paul Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 201–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ivar
(1938) Substantival Inflexion in Early Old English. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Dammel, Antje, & Kürschner, Sebastian
(2008) Complexity in Nominal Plural Allomorphy: A Contrastive Survey of ten Germanic Languages. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki, & Fred Karlsson (Eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, Studies in Language Companion Series 94, 243–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
(2004) The Acquisition of Complex Sentences, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, Jennifer, & DeKeyser, Robert
(2001) Explaining the ‘Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition’ in English: A Meta-Analysis of Multiple Determinants. Language Learning 51, 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
(1966) Language Universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, & Sims, Andrea
(2010) Understanding Morphology. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
(2004) Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Healey, Antonette di Paolo, Holland, Joan, McDougall, David, McDougall, Ian, & Xiang, Xin
(Eds.) (2009) The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M.
(1997) Some Remarks on Case Marking in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95. 95–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard M., & Fulk, R. D.
(2011) A Grammar of Old English. Volume II: Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter
(1995) Morphological Reanalysis and Typology: The Case of the German r-Plural and Why English did not Develop it. In Henning Andersen (Ed.), Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 124, 227–238. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1997) Morphological Classification in English Historical Linguistics: The Interplay of Diachrony, Synchrony and Morphological Theory. In Terttu Nevalainen, & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (Eds.), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52, 63–75. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Krygier, Marcin
(1998) On a Synchronic Approach to Old English Morphology. Folia Linguistica Historica 19, 119–128.Google Scholar
(2002) A Re-Classification of Old English Nouns. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 38, 311–319.Google Scholar
(2004) Heargas þēoda: In Search of the *u. In Radosław Dylewski, & Piotr Cap (Eds.), History and Present-day Pragmatics of the English Language, 7–13. Łódź: Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna w Łodzi.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, & Dresher, Bezalel Elan
(1984) Diachronic and Synchronic Implications of Declension Shifts. The Linguistic Review 3, 141–163.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
(1997) Why House is an Old English ‘Masculine a-Stem’? In Terttu Nevalainen, & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (Eds.), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52, 101–109. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
(1988) A Usage-Based Model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50, 127–161. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laver, John
(1994) Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter
(1982) Local and General Markedness. Language 59, 832–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wełna, Jerzy
(1996) English Historical Morphology. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph
(1910) Grammar of the Gothic Language. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
(1989) Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
(1990) Morphologisierung – Komplexität – Natürlichkeit. Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsklärung. In Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger, & Thomas Stolz (Eds.), Spielarten der Natürlichkeit – Spielarten der Ökonomie. Beiträge zum 5. Essener Kolloquium über ‘Grammatikalisierung: Natürlichkeit und Systemökonomie’ vom 6.10.-8.10.1988 an der Universität Essen, 129–153. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar