Part of
Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 111128
Anderson, John
(1991) “Should” In Dieter Kastovsky (Ed.), Historical English Syntax (11–30). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Arnovick, Lesley Katherine
(1990)  The Development of Future Constructions in English. The Pragmatics of Modal Shall and Will in Middle English . (= Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics, 2). Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
(1995) The Semantic Development of Past Tense Modals in English. In Joan L. Bybee, & Suzanne Fleischmann (Eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse (503–517). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
(1993) English Historical Syntax. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang
(2009) Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, & Wischer, Ilse
(2013) Markers of Futurity in Old High German and Old English: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study. In Gabriele Diewald, Leena Kahlas Tarkka, & Ilse Wischer (Eds.), Comparative Studies in Early Germanic Languages – With a focus on verbal categories (195–215). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
(2007) Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Samuel
(1835) King Alfred's Anglo-Saxon Version of the Meters of Boethius. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas
(2007) Dynamic Modality. Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4, 44–61.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis
(1987) The Auxiliarization of the English Modals: A functional Grammar View. In Martin Harris, & Paolo Ramat (Eds.), Historical Development of Auxiliaries (111–143). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
(2006) Prediction with SHALL and WILL: A diachronic perspective. In Antoinette Renouf, & Andrew Kehoe (Eds.), The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics (99–116). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard, & Denison, David
(2008) A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaita, Kousuke
(2015)  Modal Auxiliaries from Late Old to Early Middle English: With Special Reference to āgan, sculan, and mōtan. München: Herbert Utz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kellner, Leon
(1974) [1892] Historical outlines of English syntax. New York: Gordon Press.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
Lehmann, Christian
(2015) Thoughts on Grammaticalization. (3rd ed.). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
(1985) Old English Syntax. Vol. I: Concord, the parts of speech, and the sentence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary
. (2nd ed.). OED Online. Oxford University Press 23.032017 Retrieved from [URL]
Palmer, Frank R.
(1990) Modality and the English Modals. (2nd ed.). London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
(2001) Mood and Modality. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans
(1984) The modals' story retold. Studies in Language 8(3), 305–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanton, Michael
(Ed.) (1978) Beowulf. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Frederic Theodor
(1978) [1969] An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part III: 1. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
(1993) English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
(2006) Markers of Futurity in Old English and the Grammaticalization of shall and will . Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 42, 165–178.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
(2011) The Grammaticalization of Modality. In Heiko Narrog, & Bernd Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (595–604). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar