Cover not available
Part of
Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 111–128

Old English wolde and sceolde

A semantic and syntactic analysis

The Old English (OE) pre-modals willan and *sculan are generally considered less grammaticalized than their Modern English counterparts will and shall; nevertheless they most often function as auxiliary verbs (cf. Wischer, 2006: 173). Their present tense forms have already been studied in considerable detail, often in the context of their development into future tense markers, while their morphologically past tense forms have received comparatively little attention. In this paper I examine the past forms of willan and *sculan in the poetry texts from the Dictionary of Old English Corpus and categorize them according to their syntactic contexts and the lexical or grammatical meanings they express. Thus, the aim of this paper is to shed light on their past and non-past time-reference, their main verb use versus auxiliary use and the type of modality or other function they can express in periphrastic constructions, and hence their degree of grammaticalization in Old English.
Keywords: grammaticalization, modality, Old English, sculan , willan
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical considerations: Modality and grammaticalization
  • 3. Wolde and sceolde in Old English: Analysis of the data
  • 4.Discussion of the results
    • 4.1wolde
    • 4.2sceolde
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.06wis
References (26)
References
Anderson, John (1991). “Should” In Dieter Kastovsky (Ed.), Historical English Syntax (11–30). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Arnovick, Lesley Katherine (1990). The Development of Future Constructions in English. The Pragmatics of Modal Shall and Will in Middle English . (= Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics, 2). Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (1995). The Semantic Development of Past Tense Modals in English. In Joan L. Bybee, & Suzanne Fleischmann (Eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse (503–517). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David (1993). English Historical Syntax. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. (2009). Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, & Wischer, Ilse (2013). Markers of Futurity in Old High German and Old English: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study. In Gabriele Diewald, Leena Kahlas Tarkka, & Ilse Wischer (Eds.), Comparative Studies in Early Germanic Languages – With a focus on verbal categories (195–215). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga (2007). Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Samuel (1835). King Alfred's Anglo-Saxon Version of the Meters of Boethius. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas (2007). Dynamic Modality. Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4, 44–61.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis (1987). The Auxiliarization of the English Modals: A functional Grammar View. In Martin Harris, & Paolo Ramat (Eds.), Historical Development of Auxiliaries (111–143). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio (2006). Prediction with SHALL and WILL: A diachronic perspective. In Antoinette Renouf, & Andrew Kehoe (Eds.), The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics (99–116). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard, & Denison, David (2008). A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaita, Kousuke (2015). Modal Auxiliaries from Late Old to Early Middle English: With Special Reference to āgan, sculan, and mōtan. München: Herbert Utz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kellner, Leon (1974) [1892]. Historical outlines of English syntax. New York: Gordon Press.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas (2011). Understanding Anglo-Saxon ‘politeness’: directive constructions with “ic wille / ic wolde. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12, 230–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian (2015). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. (3rd ed.). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce (1985). Old English Syntax. Vol. I: Concord, the parts of speech, and the sentence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary. (2nd ed.). OED Online. Oxford University Press. 23.03.2017 Retrieved from [URL]
Palmer, Frank R. (1990). Modality and the English Modals. (2nd ed.). London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
(2001). Mood and Modality. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans (1984). The modals' story retold. Studies in Language 8(3), 305–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanton, Michael (Ed.). (1978). Beowulf. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, Frederic Theodor (1978) [1969]. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part III: 1. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. (1993). English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse (2006). Markers of Futurity in Old English and the Grammaticalization of shall and will . Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 42, 165–178.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra (2011). The Grammaticalization of Modality. In Heiko Narrog, & Bernd Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (595–604). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar