Cover not available
Part of
Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 175–198

Conservatism or the influence of the semantics of motion situation in the choice of perfect auxiliaries in Jane Austen’s letters and novels

The present study focuses on the analysis of the choice of either be or have in combination with the past participles of eleven motion verbs (arrive, become, come, enter, fall, go, get, grow, pass, return and run) to form perfective structures in Jane Austen’s letters and novels. She has previously been considered conservative in her grammar, specifically in relation to her preference for be as opposed to have in this type of structure. A corpus-based study shows that although she could indeed be considered conservative, the option of the auxiliary might also have been motivated by the different components of the motion situation involved in each instance. The conclusions show that some tendencies can be observed in relation to the behaviour of some of these verbs, despite the low number of occurrences of some of the verbs included in the analysis.
Keywords: perfect, auxiliary, motion verbs, cognitive approach, stylistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Previous studies
    • 1.2The present study
    • 1.3Basic motion situation
    • 1.4Hypotheses
  • 2.Method
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Motion situations in Jane Austen's letters
    • 3.2Motion situations in Jane Austen’s novels
  • 4.Letters versus novels
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 27 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.09cor
References (33)
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte (2014). The Decline of the Be-perfect, Linguistic Relativity, and Grammar Writing in the Nineteenth Century. In Marianne Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (13–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austen, Jane (2010). The Complete Works of Jane Austen. Ed. by David Widger. Project Gutenberg. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Barber Charles, Beal, Joan C., & Shaw, Philip A. (2011). The English Language. A Historical Introduction. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. (2004). English in Modern Times. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cederlöf, M. (1985). Be and Have as Perfect Auxiliaries with Mutative Verbs in Some Novels by Jane Austen, Charles Dickens and George Eliot. University of Stockholm (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert W. (1952). Jane Austen’s Letters To Her Sister Cassandra and Others, 1796–1817, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Corry, Pearl (2014, January, 10). The Education of Jane and Cassandra. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Denison, David (1993). Historical English Syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1998). Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, (Vol. 4, 1776–1997, 92–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, T (2010, September, 20). Jane Austen Went to School. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language. London: Times Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja (1997). Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö, & Kirsi Heikkonen (Eds.), English in transition: Corpus-based studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles (17–84). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Faye, Deirdre (1997). Chronology of Jane Austen’s life. In Edward Copeland, & Juliet McMaster (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen (1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowth, Robert (1763). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. (2nd ed.). London.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs, Cognitive Linguistics 7, 138–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin (2014) ‘[W]ell, are you not got over thinking about going to Ireland yet’: the Be-perfect in Eighteenth and Nineteenth century Irish English. In Marianne Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (13–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miège, Guy (1688). The English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Page, Norman (1972). The Language of Jane Austen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phillips, K. C. (1970). Jane Austen’s English. London: Andre Deutsh.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramscar, Michael, Matlock, Teenie, & Boroditsky, Lera (2009). Time, motion and meaning: the experiential basis of abstract thought. In Kelly S. Mix, Linda B. Smith, & Michael Gasser (Eds.), The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition (67–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rydén, Mats, & Brorstöm, Sverker (1987). The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Singh, A (2010, October, 22). Jane Austen’s famous prose may not be hers after all. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani, & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions (195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Kathryn (2012). Jane Austen’s dealings with John Murray and his firm, RES The Review of English Studies 64(263), 105–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (1975). Semantics and Syntax of motion. In John P. Kimbali (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 4, 181–238). Nueva York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Timothy Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Towards a Cognitive Linguistics. Vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (2009). An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
(2014). In search of Jane Austen: The Language of the Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Th., (1973). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. I-III. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Warren, Renee (2018, April, 10). Jane Austen Life Timeline. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Wijitsopon, Raksangob (2013). A Corpus-based Study of the Style in Jane Austen’s Novels. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities 16(1), 41–64.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Calvo Cortes, Nuria
2020. Women writers in the 18th century. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.