Cover not available
Part of
Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Claudia Claridge and Birte Bös
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346] 2019
► pp. 223–246

From time-before-place to place-before-time in the history of English

A corpus-based analysis of adverbial clusters

In Present-day English, place adverbials tend to precede adverbials of time in clusters (cf. Hasselgård, 1996). In this paper, this word order preference is investigated from a diachronic perspective. The corpus-based analysis shows that the preferred order changes from time-before-place in Old English to place-before-time towards the end of the Middle English period. In a number of binary logistic regressions this study explores which factors might motivate these preferences respectively. The obligatoriness of the adverbials and their realization form emerge as two crucial factors. Their effect can be related to the proximity principle (cf. Hasselgård, 2010), the principle of end weight, and the principle of given-before-new. Comparing the different periods of English from Old English to Early Modern English, this paper shows how the increasingly fixed position of the lexical verb can be linked to the reversal of the ordering preference from time-before-place to place-before-time.
Keywords: word order, adverbial, proximity principle, information structure
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Factors that motivate the order of adverbials in clusters – previous research and annotation of the data
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results of the analyses
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Complements and their proximity to the lexical verb
    • 5.2Weight, realization form and the given-before-new principle
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 27 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.346.11chr
References (41)
References
Akaike, Hirotugu (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 22, 47–76.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer, & Wasow, Thomas (2000). Heaviness vs. Newness: The Effects of Structural Complexity and Discourse Status on Constituent Ordering. Language 76(1), 28–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bech, Kristin (2001). Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. Doctoral dissertation. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto (1932). Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Band IV. Wortstellung. Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward (2004). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. 4th improved ed. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
BNC = The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. [URL]
Chrambach, Susanne (2013). Exploring historical corpora – The syntactic labels locative adverb and temporal adverb in the York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. In Anja Hennemann, & Claudia Schlaak (Eds.), Korpuslinguistische Untersuchungen: Analysen einzelsprachlicher Phänomene (59–66). Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
(2014). The order of adverbials of time and place in Old English. In Pfenninger et al. (Eds.), Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English. [Studies in Language Companion Series 159] (39–60). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo (2004). Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 114(6), 683–710.Google Scholar
Daron, Carol F. (1974). The Position of Adverbials in a Selected Corpus of Early Old English Prose. Auburn Univ. Diss. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1990). Syntax. A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. (2008). Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharski, Ron (1993). Referring Expressions in Discourse Language 69, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2000). Adverb placement - convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26, 95–134.Google Scholar
(2004). Pre- and postverbal adverbials in OV and VO. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 114(6), 779-807.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde (1992). Sequences of spatial and temporal adverbials in spoken and written English. In Gerhard Leitner (Ed.), New Directions in English Language Corpora. Methodology, Results, Software Developments (319–328). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Where and When? Positional and functional conventions for sequences of time and space adverbials in present-day English. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. (2000). The relative order of prepositional phrases in English: Going beyond Manner – Place – Time. Language Variation and Change 11, 231–266.Google Scholar
Heggelund, Øystein Imerslund (2010). Word Order in Old English and Middle English Subordinate Clauses. Doctoral dissertation. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin (2013). Constructional Change in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland (2009). The role of information structure in word order variation and word order change. In Roland Hinterhölzl, & Svetlana Petrova (Eds.), Information Structure and Language Change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic (45–66). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, & Taylor, Ann (2000). The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice, & Delfs, Lauren (2004). The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula (2010). Argument and Rhetoric. Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou (2012). The Loss of Verb-Second and the Switch from Bounded to Unbounded Systems. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso, & Bettelou Los (Eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English (21–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli (2001). Genre as a Variable in Sociohistorical Linguistics. European Journal of English Studies 5(2), 241–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier (2016). Do you investigate word order in detail or do you investigate in detail word order? On word order and headedness in the recent history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1), 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin (1995). Valenz und Relevanz – eine informationsstrukturelle Erklärung für “obligatorische” Adverbiale. In Robert J. Pittner, & Karin Pittner (Eds.), Beiträge zu Sprache und Sprachen. Vorträge der 4. Münchner Linguistik-Tage der Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen (GESUS) e.V. (95–106). München: lincom europa.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen (1981). Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (223–256). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL].Google Scholar
Shannon, Thomas F., & Coffey, Michael P. (2004). The Janus-faced Order of Adverbials in Dutch and English. In Thomas F. Shannon, & Johan P. Snapper (Eds.), Janus at the Millennium (245–264). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan, & Beths, Frank (2003). The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. available online at < [URL] > Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, & Pintzuk, Susan (2014). Testing the Theory. Information Structure in Old English. In Kristin Bech, & Kristine Gunn Eide, Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages (53–80). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija (1992). Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English. Clause-Initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Verlag.Google Scholar
(2010). Variation across texts and discourses: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on text type and genre. In Heidrun von Dorgeloh, & Anja Wanner (Eds.), Topics in English Linguistics 70: Syntactic Variation and Genre (53–84). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, Brita (2011). Connective or “disconnective” discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, & Ursula Lenker (Eds.), Varieng Vol. 8: Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages. < [URL] >.Google Scholar