Cover not available
Part of
Norms and Conventions in the History of English
Edited by Birte Bös and Claudia Claridge
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 347] 2019
► pp. 49–72

Paradigm shifts in 19th-century British grammar writing

A network of texts and authors

ORCID logo
Systematic and comprehensive linguistic studies of 19th-century British grammar books are scarce. This is surprising since the 19th century has often been claimed to constitute a turning point in English grammar writing, particularly due to the assumed paradigm shift from prescriptive works to predominantly descriptive grammars, the emergence of the comparative-historical approach around 1830, and phonetics gaining importance in the 1890s.
Combining methods from network analysis and historical corpus linguistics, we aim to reassess these assumed (meta)linguistic developments in grammar writing by examining authors’ references to other grammarians in a corpus of 19th-century British grammars. We will show that changes, such as the turn away from prescriptive grammar writing, can indeed be further enhanced and systematically supported by quantitative results from the analysed network of referenced grammars and grammarians. Further, the analysis of the grammars’ lexical inventory shows which authors take the lead in terminological progress.
Keywords: grammar writing, network analysis, corpus linguistics, 19th century
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: 19th-century grammar writing
  • 2.The corpus and methodology
  • 3.Results of network and frequency analysis
    • 3.1Most frequently referenced grammarians
    • 3.2Most frequently referencing grammar authors
    • 3.3Network of grammarians’ references
    • 3.4Distribution of linguistic keywords in the grammar corpus
      • 3.4.1Comparative and historical
      • 3.4.2Phonetic(s)/phonology
      • 3.4.3Prescriptive/prescription and descriptive
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpus of 19th-century grammar books
  • Other grammar books
  • Appendix
Published online: 27 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.347.04bus
References (68)
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte. (2016). Language Between Description and Prescription: Verbs and Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Anita. (2008). Eighteenth-century grammars and book catalogues. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (Ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing in Eighteenth-Century England (57–75). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. (1996). Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. (2004). English In Modern Times, 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod. (1998). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Translated and edited by George P. Trauth and Kerstin Kazzazi. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapman, Don. (2008). The eighteenth-century grammarians as language experts. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (Ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing in Eighteenth-Century England (21–36). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. (1975). Number and Case Relations in 19th Century British English: A Comparative Study of Grammar and Usage. Bibliotheca Linguistica. Antwerpen et al.: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward. (1998). English Grammar and Usage. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol. IV: 1776–1997. (536–588). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. (1998). An Annotated Bibliography of Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). English in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (Ed.). (2010). Eighteenth-Century English. Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howatt, Anthony P. R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linn, Andrew. (2006). English grammar writing. In Bas Aarts, April McMahon (Eds.), Handbook of English Linguistics (72–92). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C. (1998). Phonology. In Suzanne Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol. IV: 1776–1997 (373–535). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGlashan, Mark. (2015). #CL2015 social media roundup: Using Corpus Linguistics to investigate Corpus Linguists talking about Corpus Linguistics. ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS). Retrieved from [URL]
Michael, Ian. (1987). The Teaching of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onions, Charles Talbut. (1921). Henry Sweet. In Dictionary of National Biography (519). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Online. December 2016. Oxford University Press. [URL]
Prell, Christina. (2012). Social Network Analysis. History, Theory & Methodology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Stuart, Keith, & Botella, Ana. (2009). Corpus Linguistics, Network Analysis and Co-occurrence Matrices. In Universidad de Murcia. International Journal of English Studies (Special Issue, 1–28).Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (Ed.). (2008). Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Howard D. (2011). Scientific and Scholarly Networks. In John Scott & Peter J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis (271–285). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Corpus of 19th-century grammar books
Abbott, Edwin A. (1871). English Lessons for English People. London.Google Scholar
Alexander, Levy. (1833). The Young Lady and Gentleman’s Guide to the Grammar of the English Language in Verse. London.Google Scholar
Arnold, Thomas K. (1838). An English Grammar for Classical Schools. London.Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander. (1863). An English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Barnes, William. (1878). An Outline of English Speech-Craft. London.Google Scholar
Booth, David. (1837). The Principles of English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Churchill, T. O. (1823). A New Grammar of the English Language […]. London.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William. (1818). Grammar of the English Language, in a Series of Letters. New York.Google Scholar
Coghlan, John. (1868). Reformed English Grammar. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cramp, William. (1838). The Philosophy of Language. London.Google Scholar
Crane, George. (1843). The Principles of Language; Exemplified in a Practical English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alexander. (1802). The Etymology and Syntax of the English Language, Explained and Illustrated. London.Google Scholar
Daniel, Rev. Evan. (1881). The Grammar, History and Derivation of the English Language. London.Google Scholar
Doherty, Hugh. (1841). An Introduction to English Grammar, on Universal Principles. London.Google Scholar
Duxbury, C. (1886). A New English Grammar of School Grammars. London.Google Scholar
Earnshaw, Christopher. (1817). The Grammatical Remembrancer. Huddersfield.Google Scholar
Fleay, Frederick Gard. (1884). The logical English grammar. London.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. (1809). A New and Improved Grammar of the English Tongue. London.Google Scholar
James, J. H. (1847). The Elements of Grammar, according to Dr. Becker’s System. London.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Alexander. (1818). A grammar of rhetoric and polite literature. London.Google Scholar
Kigan, John. (1825). A Practical English Grammar, agreeably to a new System. Belfast.Google Scholar
Latham, Robert Gordon. (1843). An Elementary English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Leigh, Percival. (1840). The Comic English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Lennie, William. (1810). The principles of English grammar briefly defined, and neatly arranged. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Marcet, Jane. (1835). Mary’s Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Mason, Charles Peter. (1858). English Grammar; including the Principles of Grammatical Analysis. London.Google Scholar
McArthur, Alexander. (1836). An outline of English grammar for the use of schools. Dublin.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, John. (1862–1866). An Easy English Grammar for Beginners. London.Google Scholar
Morell, John Daniel. (1852). The analysis of sentences explained and systematised: with an exposition of the fundamental laws of syntax. After the plan of Becker’s German grammar. London.Google Scholar
Murray, Gerald. (1847). The Reformed Grammar, or Philosophical Test of English Composition. London.Google Scholar
Nesfield, John Collinson. (1898a). English Grammar Past and Present. London.Google Scholar
. (1898b). Manual on English Grammar and Composition. London.Google Scholar
Simmonite, Wiliam Joseph. (1841). The Practical Self-teaching Grammar of the English Language. London.Google Scholar
Smart, Benjamin H. (1847). Grammar on its True Basis. London.Google Scholar
Steel, G. (1894). An English grammar and analysis for students and young teachers. London.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. (1892/1898). A New English Grammar: logical and historical. 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thring, Rev. Edward. (1851). The Elements of Grammar Taught in English. Cambridge.Google Scholar
White, Frederick Averne. (1882). English Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Williams, David. (1818). The catechism of English grammar, containing the principles of the language, and rules and directions for speaking and writing it with propriety and accuracy. London.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Thomas John. (1846). A School Grammar of the English Language. Dublin.Google Scholar
Other grammar books
Harris, James. (1751). Hermes, or a Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language. London.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert. (1762). A Short Introduction to English Grammar with Critical Notes. London.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley. (1795). English Grammar Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. […]. York.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. (1892). Short English Historical Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

WIEMANN, MARCO
2023. Representations of phonological changes ingoatand /r/ in theCollection of Nineteenth-century Grammars(CNG). English Language and Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 591 ff. DOI logo
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria
2022. Methodological approaches to the study of codification, prescription, and prescriptivism. Studia Neophilologica 94:3 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.