Chapter published in:
Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27-31 July 2015
Edited by Michela Cennamo and Claudia Fabrizio
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 348] 2019
► pp. 519–560

Chapter 25
Grammaticalizing the face in a first generation sign language

The case of “Z”

Zincantec Family Homesign (or “Z”) is a first generation sign-language emerging in a single family in Chiapas, Mexico. Despite its very short history Z demonstrates how speakers’ gestures can “jump” into the lexicon of a newly created sign language and become further specialized via processes of grammaticalization. This paper moves beyond the grammaticalization of manual signs to consider how facial expressions can similarly be incorporated into the emerging lexicon and morphosyntax of even a very young sign language, contributing to the systematic expression of such grammatical categories as affective and epistemic stance.
Keywords: grammaticalization, sign-language, pragmatics, evolution of language, emergence, emerging sign language, homesign, non-manual signs, facial expression, stance, evidential, affect
Article outline
  • 1.Z: A first generation sign language
  • 2.A brief typology of Z signs
  • 3.An instance of grammaticalization in Z
  • 4.Affect and attention on the face
  • 5.Grammars of the face
  • 6.The frown: Critical uncertainty
  • 7.Conclusion and summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.348.25hav
References
Aissen, Judith
1992 Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 61:1. 43–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
2016 Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review123. 324–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana
2004 Facial expression as intonation in Israeli Sign Language: the case of neutral and counterfactual conditionals. Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR. 61–82.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles
1872 The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: J. Murray. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Jorio, Andrea & Adam Kendon
2000 Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
de Vos, Connie
2012 Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok. Ph.D. dissertation. Nijmegen: Radboud University.Google Scholar
Dingemanse Mark, Seán G. Roberts, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd
, et al. 2015 Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenaus
1972 Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive movements. In Robert A. Hinde (ed.), Non-verbal Communication, 297–313. Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen
1971 Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology 17:2. 124–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Los Altos: Malor.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul
1993 Facial expression and emotion. American psychologist 48:4. 384–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen
, et al. 1987 Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology 53:4. 712–717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Heidi, Susan Goldin-Meadow & Leila Gleitman
1978 Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In Andrew Lock (ed.), Action, symbol, and gesture: The emergence of language, 351–414. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frith, Chris
2009 Role of facial expressions in social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364. 3453–3458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy
1987 Home sign. In John Van Cleve (ed.), Gallaudet encyclopedia of deaf people and deafness, 3. 128–131. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Fusellier-Souza, Ivani
2004 Sémiogenèse des langues des signes, Étude de langues des signes emergentes (LS ÉMG) pratiquées par des sourds brésiliens. Doctoral thesis, Sciences du Langage, Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
2006 Emergence and development of sign languages: from a semiogenetic point of view. Sign Language Studies 7. 30–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
1993 When does gesture become language? A study of gesture used as a primary communication system by deaf children of hearing parents. In Kathleen. R. Gibson & Tim Ingold (eds.), Talk, language, and cognition in human language, 63–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003 The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2012 Homesign: gesture to language. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 601–625. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Cynthia Butcher, Carolyn Mylander & Mark Dodge
1994 Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: What’s in a name? Cognitive Psychology 27. 259–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grammer, Karl, Wulf Schiefenhövel, Margret Schleidt, Beatrice Lorenz & Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt
1988 Patterns on the face: the eyebrow flash in crosscultural comparison. Ethology 77. 279–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B.
1977 Gossip, Reputation, and Knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1981 Sk’op Sotz’leb; El Tzotzil de San Lorenzo Zinacantán. México, D.F.: Centro de Estudios Mayas, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
2011 Nouns, verbs, and constituents in an emerging ‘Tzotzil’ sign language. In Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, 151–171. Santa Cruz, CA.: California Digital Library eScholarship Repository, Linguistic Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
2013a Xi to vi: “Over that way, look!” (Meta)spatial representation in an emerging (Mayan?) sign language. In Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock & Benedikt Szmerecsanyi (eds.), Space in Language and Linguistics, 334–400. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b (Mis)understanding and obtuseness: “ethnolinguistic borders” in a miniscule speech community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 23:3. 160–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013c The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture 13:3. 309–353.Google Scholar
2014 Different strokes: gesture phrases and gesture units in a family homesign from Chiapas, Mexico. In Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gulberg (eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance, 245–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015 “Hey!” Topics in Cognitive Science 7. 124–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “But you said ‘four sheep’!”: (sign) language, ideology, and self (esteem) across generations in a Mayan family. Language & Communication 46. 62–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997 Possession: cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth C. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957 Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. Harvard University, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Russian Language Project.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry
2012 Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 816–841. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter,Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer
2002 Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Richard P. Meier et al.. (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Barbara Shaffer & Sherman Wilcox
2011 [1999] Signed language pragmatics. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture, Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2016 The chicken and the quetzal. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Robert M.
1975 The Great Tzotzil Dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantan. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, No. 19. Washington. D.C.: Smithsonian. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, Olivier
2012 An exploration in the domain of time: from Yucatec Maya time gestures to Yucatec Maya Sign Language time signs. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds.), Endangered sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights, 209–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Rache. L. & Sophia Wallingford
2011 ‘So, well, whatever’: Discourse functions of palm-up in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 14:2. 213–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
1992 Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff, & Wendy Sandler
2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 43. 531–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, Angela M.
2004 The forgotten endangered languages: lessons on the importance of remembering from Thailand’s Ban Khor Sign Language. Language in Society 33:5. 737–767. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Estimating size, scope, and membership of the speech/sign communities of undocumented indigenous/village sign languages: The Ban Khor case study. Language & Communication 29:3. 210–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Language Socialization and Language Endangerment. In Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs & Bambi Schieffelin (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization, 610–630. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela & Ulrike Zeshan
2008 Possessive and existential constructions in Kata Kolok (Bali). In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages, 125–150. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Marcus Steinbach
2006 Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign Languages. Linguistics in Potsdam 24. 5–98.Google Scholar
2011 Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 683–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:4. 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Mark Aronoff
2005 The emergence of a grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102:7. 2661–2665. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara
2012 Reported speech as an evidentiality strategy in American Sign Language. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language, 139–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15:2. 175–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stec, Kashmiri
2012 Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture 12(3). 327–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 57. 33–65.Google Scholar
1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1977 The ignorative: The semantics of speech acts. International Review of Slavic Linguistics, 2:2–3. 251–312.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B.
2000 “Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language.” In Karen Emmorey, Harlan L. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 190–215. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman
2004 Gesture and language: Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture 4. 43–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Routes from gesture to language. In Elena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea, & Raffaele Simone. (eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies, 107–131. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Phyllis & Sherman Wilcox
1995 The gestural expression of modality in American Sign Language. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse, 135–162. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2003 Classificatory constructions in Indo-Pakistani sign language: Grammaticalization and lexicalization processes. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, 113–141. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2006 Negative and interrogative constructions in sign languages: A case study in sign language typology. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 28–68. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004a Interrogative constructions in signed languages: crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80:1. 7–39.Google Scholar
2004b Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8. 1–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike & Connie De Vos
(eds.) 2012 Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and Linguistic Insights. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar