Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2017: Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July – 4 August 2017
Edited by Bridget Drinka
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 350] 2020
► pp. 109–142

The actualization of new voice patterns in Romance

Persistence in diversity

This article discusses some aspects of the reorganization of voice distinctions in the transition from Latin to Romance, namely the grammaticalization of activity (do / make) and change of state (become) verbs as markers of the passive voice, and the reanalysis of the reflexive morpheme se as a voice modulator, focussing on patterns of invariance (i.e., persistence) of Latin inheritance and principled differences (i.e., divergence) in the type and extent of variation and further developments in this area of Romance morphosyntax.
Keywords: voice, passive, reflexive, light verb, auxiliary
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Voice in the transition to Romance
    • 2.1Restructuring of the voice system and changes in the referential domain of se in Late Latin
      • 2.1.1Reflexives
      • 2.1.2The extension of the active voice into the realm of the passive
      • 2.1.3Passivization and deponentization
    • 2.2Equivalences among voice forms and changes in argument linking / marking
    • 2.3Changes in the referential domain of se
  • 3.Steps in the auxiliarization of lexical verbs in the transition to Romance: Fieri and facere
    • 3.1 Fieri ‘become’ as a voice marker
    • 3.2Latin antecedents of facere ‘do, make’ passive
    • 3.3Grammaticalization paths in the rise of passive periphrases in Late Latin
  • 4.Auxiliaries and voice in Old Italo-Romance
    • 4.1*Fire ‘become’+ pp
    • 4.2 Faker ‘make / do’+pp
  • 5.The reanalysis of se as a voice modulator in early (Italo-)Romance and Old Logudorese Sardinian
    • 5.1Old Venetian
    • 5.2Old Lombard
    • 5.3Old Florentine
    • 5.4Old Neapolitan
    • 5.5Old Logudorese Sardinian
    • 5.6Summary
    • 5.7The origin of impersonal / indefinite se in Italo-Romance
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Old Italian sources
Published online: 9 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.06cen
References (108)
References
Adams, J. (2013). Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. & Vincent, N. (Eds.). (2016). Early and late Latin: Continuity or change?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. (Ed.). (2001). Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory amd History of Linguistic Science Series 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Actualization and the (uni) directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (Ed.) Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. (pp. 225–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.). (2011). Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. & Chelliah, S. (Eds). (2009). The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassols de Climent, M. (1948). Sintaxis Històrica de la Lengua Latina. vol 2. Barcelona: Escuela de Filología.Google Scholar
Benincà, P., Ledgeway, A. & Vincent, N. (Eds.). (2014). Diachrony and dialects. Grammatical change in the dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. & Squartini, M. (1995). An attempt at defining the class of gradual completion verbs. In P. M. Bertinetto (Ed.). Temporal reference, aspect and actionality. 1. Semantic and syntactic perspectives. (pp. 11–26). Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. (Ed.). (2005). Temporal reference, aspect and actionality. 1. Semantic and syntactic perspectives. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, E. (1995). Un passivo smarrito: fecit positum ‘venne assegnato. In C. Mastrelli (Ed.), Studi Linguistici per i 50 anni del Circolo Linguistico Fiorentino e i secondi Mille Dibattiti 1970–1995. (pp. 47–53). Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Bonnet, M. (1890). Le latin de Grégoire de Tours. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Burton, P. (2016). Analytic passives and deponents in classical and later Latin. In J. Adams & N. Vincent (Eds.). Early and Late Latin: Continuity or change?. (pp. 163–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, M. (1991a). La nascita di un nuovo sistema di voce in italiano antico. In Dieter Kremer (ed.), Actes du VIIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, (pp. 242–262). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1991b). Se, sibi, suus nelle Inscriptiones Latinae Christianae Veteres ed i successivi sviluppi romanzi. Medioevo Romanzo 16.1 / 2. 3–20.Google Scholar
(1993a). The Reanalysis of reflexives: A diachronic perspective. Naples: Liguori.Google Scholar
(1993b). L’estensione del dominio referenziale del riflessivo in testi italiani antichi. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 78.1. 53–62.Google Scholar
(1998). The loss of the voice dimension between Late Latin and early Romance. In M. Schmid, J. Austin & D. Stein (Eds.), Historical linguistics 1997. (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusativity Hypothesis. Transactionsof the Philological Society 97.1. 103–150.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Costruzioni passive e impersonali in Veneziano e in Napoletano antico. In A. Englebert, M. Perrard, L. Rosier, & D. Van Raemdonck (Eds.), Actes du XXIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes (Bruxelles, 23–29 July 1998), vol. 2: Les Nouvelles Ambitions de la Linguistique Diacronique, (pp. 91–103). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001a). L’extended accusative e le nozioni di voce e relazione grammaticale nel latino tardo e medievale. In V. Viparelli (Ed.), Ricerche linguistiche tra antico e moderno, (pp. 3–27). Naples: Liguori.Google Scholar
(2001b). On the reorganization of voice distinctions and grammatical relations between Late Latin and early Romance. In Claude Moussy (Ed.), De Lingua Latina Novae Quaestiones, Actes du Xè Colloque International de Linguistique Latine. (pp. 51–65). Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
(2001c). Classi verbali e cambiamento sintattico: la reinterpretazione passiva del costrutto riflessivo. In Z. Fábián & G. Salvi (Eds.), Atti del XXXII Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana. (pp. 225–242). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
(2003). Perifrasi passive in testi non toscani delle origini. In N. Maraschio & T. Poggi Salani (Eds.), Italia linguistica anno mille, Italia linguistica anno Duemila, Atti del XXXIV Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana, 105–127. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
(2005). Passive auxiliaries in Late Latin. In S. Kiss & G. Salvi (Eds.). Études de Linguistique offertes à Jôzsef Herman à l’occasion de son 80ième anniversaire. (pp. 179–196). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive Auxiliaries. In W. Abraham & L. Leisiö (Eds.). Passivization and typology. (p. 311–336). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Auxiliaries and serials between Late Latin and early Romance. In D. Bentley & A. Ledgeway (Eds.). Sui Dialetti Italoromanzi. Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent. The Italianist, special supplement 1. 63–87.Google Scholar
(2008). The rise and development of analytic perfects in Italo-Romance. In T. Eythórsson (Ed.), Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory. The Rosendal Papers, (pp.115-142). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Argument structure and alignment variation and changes in Late Latin. In J. Barðdal & S. Chelliah (Eds). The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case. (pp. 307–346). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a). Impersonal constructions and accusative subjects in Late Latin. In A. Malchukov & A. Siewierska (Eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective. (pp. 169–188). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). Case marking of core arguments and alignment in Late Latin. In M. Fruyt, M. Mazoyer & D. Pardee (Eds). Grammatical case in the languages of the Middle East and Europe. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 64, (pp. 297–314). Chicago: The Oriental Institure of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
(2014). Passive and impersonal reflexives in the Italian dialects. Synchronic and diachronic aspects. In P. Benincà, A. Ledgeway & N. Vincent (Eds.), Diachrony and dialects. Grammatical change in the dialects of Italy. (pp. 71–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Voice. In M. Maiden & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, (pp. 967–980). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Grammaticalization and changes in argument linking: A case-study from old Logudorese Sardinian. In M. Chini & P. Cuzzolin (Eds.), Tipologia, acquisizione, grammaticalizzazione – Typology, acquisition, grammaticalization studies, (pp. 96–117). Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
(2019a). Aspects of grammaticalization and reanalysis in the voice domain in the transition from Latin to early Italo-Romance. In L. Heltoft, I. Igartua, B. Joseph, K. Kragh, & L. Schøsler (Eds.). Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change. (pp. 205–232). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). Intransitive alternations and the semantics of predicates in Latin. In P. Cotticelli Kurras & S. Ziegler (Eds.), Tra Semantica e Sintassi: il Ruolo della Linguistica Storica, (pp. 1-31). Rome: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
(2020). Mechanisms and paths of grammaticalization and reanalysis in Romance. In W. Bisang & A. Malchukov (Eds.), Grammaticalization scenarios. areal patterns and cross- linguistic variation. A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Cennamo, M., Eythórsson, T. & J. Barðdal (Eds.). (2015). Anticausatives in Latin and Old- Norse Icelandic: (Morpho)syntactic aspects and semantic constraints. Linguistics 53.4. 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Danckaert, L. (2016). Variation and change in Latin be-periphrases: Empirical and methodological considerations. In J. Adams & N. Vincent (Eds.). Early and Late Latin: Continuity or change? (pp. 132–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). The origins of the Romance analytic passive: Evidence from word order. In E. Mathieu & R. Truswell (Eds.). Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax. (pp. 216–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Bartholomaeis, V. (1902). Codex diplomaticus Cajetanus. Archivio glottologico italiano 16: 9–27.Google Scholar
De Melo, W. (2012). Kuryłowicz’s first “law of analogy” and the development of passiv periphrases in Latin. In P. Probert & A. Willi (Eds). Laws and Rules in Indo-European. (pp. 83–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. (1987). Copula auxiliarization: how and why?. In Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (Eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, (pp. 54–84). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feltenius, L. (1977). Intransitivization in Latin. Uppsala: Almkvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (1975). Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. & Sansò, A. (2011). From passive to impersonal. A case study from Italian and its implications. In: A. Malchukov & A. Siewierska (Eds.). Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, (pp. 189–228). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, J. (1982). The status of the Romance auxiliaries of voice. In N. Vincent & M. Harris (Eds.). Studies in the Romance verb. (pp. 97–138). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Haag, O. (1898). Die Latinität Fredegars. Erlangen: Junge.Google Scholar
Hageman, K. (2006). The Latin synthetic passive in the Códice Emilianense. Romansk Forum 20.2. 91–102.Google Scholar
Harris, A. & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1987). Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Universität zu Köln. (Arbeitspapiere N.F. 5).Google Scholar
(2011). On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15.3. 535–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Kennedy, C. & Levin, B. (1999). Scale structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. In T. Mathews and D. Strolovitch (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Reh, M. (1982). Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1993). Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, J. (2002). La disparition du passif synthétique latin: nouvel essai sur l’écrit et le parlé en latin Mérovingien. Estudis romànics 24. 31–46.Google Scholar
Herzog, E. (1910). Das –to Partizip im Altromanischen. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 26. 76–186.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J., Leumann, M. & Szantyr, A. (1963). Lateinische Grammatik, vol. 1. München: Beck.Google Scholar
(1965). Lateinische Grammatik, vol. 2. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, A. (2009). Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27. 77–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1977). Linguistic Gestalts. CLS 13. 238–87.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. (1988). Predicate classes and participation. Studies in General Comparative Linguistics, 33–77. Köln: Akup.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2009). Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 350. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M. & Parry, M. (Eds.). (1997). The dialects of Italy. London / NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malchukov, A. & Siewierska, A. (Eds.). (2011). Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, R. & Savoia, L. (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci, vol. 2. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1902). Zur Kenntniss der Altlogudoresischen. Wien: Sitzungsberichte der Kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Band CXLV.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne. (1998). Antikausativ als Brücke zum Passiv: fieri, venire und se im Vulgärlateinische und Altitalienischen. In W. Dahmen, G. Holtus & J. Kramer (Eds.). Neuere Beschreibungsmethoden der Syntax romanischen Sprachen. (pp. 69–98). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (2015). The Oxford Latin syntax. Vol. 1. The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirson, J. (1901). La langue des inscriptions latines de la Gaule. Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. XI.Google Scholar
(1906). Mulomedichina Chironis. La syntaxe du verbe. Festschrift zum Allgemeinen Deutschen Neuphilologentage, Erlangen, 390–431.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1985). Relational typology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pountain, C. (1982). *Essere / Stare as a Romance phenomenon. In N. Vincent & M. Harris (Eds.). Studies in the Romance verb, (pp. 139–60). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Probert, P. & Willi, A. (Eds). (2012). Laws and rules in Indo-European. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenkron, G. (1933). Passivum, Medium und Reflexivum in den romanischen Sprachen, Jena / Leipzig: Gronau (Berliner Beiträge zur romanischen Philologie III.1).Google Scholar
Ronconi, A. (1968). Il verbo latino. Problemi di sintassi storica. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Salvi, G. (1988). La frase semplice. In L. Renzi (Ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 1, (pp. 29–113). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
(2010). La realizzazione sintattica della struttura argomentale. In G. Salvi & L. Renzi (Eds.). Grammatica dell’Italiano Antico, vol. I, (pp. 123–189). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Svennung, J. (1935). Untersuchungen zu Palladius und zur Lateinischen Fach- und Volkssprache. Uppsala: Almquist.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N. (1987). The interaction between periphrases and inflection: some Romance examples. In M. Harris & P. Ramat (Eds.). Historical development of auxiliaries. (pp. 237–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehr, Barbara. (1995). SE-Diathese im Italienischen. (Romanica Monacensia 37). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret. (1984). Steps toward the Romance passive inferrable from the Itinerarium Egeriae. Romance Philology 37. 445–54.Google Scholar
Woodcock, Eric. (1959). A new Latin syntax. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Old Italian sources
Bonvesin, Disputatio = Disputatio musce cum formica. In G. Contini (Ed.). (1937). Cinque Volgari di Bonvesin da la Riva (pp. 27–40). Modena: Società Tipografica Modenese.Google Scholar
Bonvesin, De quinq. curial. = De quinquaginta curialitatibus ad mensam. In G. Contini, (Ed.). (1937). Cinque Volgari di Bonvesin da la Riva. (pp. 41–44). Modena: Società Tipografica Modenese.Google Scholar
Capitolare = Princivalli, A. & Ortalli, G. (Eds.). (1993). Il Capitolare degli Ufficiali sopra Rialto. Nei luoghi al centro del sistema economico veneziano (secoli XIII-XIV). Milan: La Storia.Google Scholar
Cedola di Marco Granello = Cedola di Marco Granello. In A. Stussi (Ed.). (1965). Testi veneziani del Duecento e dei primi del Trecento. (pp. 36–40). Pisa: Nistri-Lischi.Google Scholar
Cedola di Marco Michel = Cedola di Marco Michel. In A. Stussi (Ed.). (1965). Testi veneziani del Duecento e dei primi del Trecento. (pp. 111–22). Pisa: Nistri-Lischi.Google Scholar
Compagnia di S. M. del Carmine = Libro degli ordinamenti della Compagnia di Santa Maria del Carmine. In A. Schiaffini (Ed.). (1926). Testi fiorentini del Dugento e dei primi del Trecento. (pp. 55–72). Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Cronica = Ceruti, A. (Ed.). (1878). Cronica degli Imperadori. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 3: 177–243.Google Scholar
Cronica fior. = Cronica Fiorentina. In A. Schiaffini (Ed.). (1926). Testi fiorentini del Dugento e dei primi del Trecento. (pp. 82–150). Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
CSNT = Merci, P. (Ed.). (1992). Il Condaghe di San Nicola di Trullas. Sassari: Delfino.Google Scholar
CSPS = Delogu, I. (Ed.). (1997). Il Condaghe di San Pietro di Silki. Testo Logudorese Inedito dei Secoli XI-XIII. Sassari: Dess.Google Scholar
CV = Solmi, A. (1905). Le carte volgari dell’Archivio Arcivescovile di Cagliari: Testi campidanesi dei secoli XI–XIII. Archivio Storico 35.238: 273–330.Google Scholar
Dante, Inf. = Petrocchi, G. (Ed.). (1966). Dante Alighieri, La Commedia secondo l'antica vulgata, vol. II Inferno. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Grisostomo = Forster, W. (Ed.). (1880-1883). Antica parafrasi lombarda del <<Neminem laedi nisi a se ipso>> di S. Giovanni Grisostomo’, Archivio Glottologico Italiano 7: 1–120.Google Scholar
Destructione de Troya = De Blasi, N. (Ed.). (1986). Libro de la Destructione de Troya. Volgarizzamento Napoletano Trecentesco da Guido delle Colonne. Rome: Bonacci.Google Scholar
Distruzione di Troia = Libro della distruzione di Troia (Da un). In A. Schiaffini (Ed.). (1926). Testi fiorentini del Dugento e dei primi del Trecento. (pp. 151–184). Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Milione = Bertolucci Pizzorusso, V. (Ed.). (1975). Il Milione di Marco Polo (versione toscana del Trecento). Milan: Adelphi.Google Scholar
Novellino = Conte, A. (Ed.). (2001). Il Novellino. Roma: Salerno.Google Scholar
Panfilo = Tobler, A. (Ed.). (1886). Il Panfilo in antico veneziano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 10: 179–243.Google Scholar
Passione = Salvioni, C. (Ed.). (1886). La Passione e altre antiche scritture Lombarde. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 9: 1–22.Google Scholar
Ricordi = Ricordi di compere e cambi di terre in Val di Streda e dintorni. In A. Castellani (Ed.). (1982). La prosa italiana delle origini: I, Testi toscani di carattere pratico. (pp. 215–254). Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
RSPS = Piras, S. S. & Dessì, G. (Eds.). (2003). Il Registro di S. Pietro di Sorres. Cagliari: Cuec.Google Scholar
Sacchetti, Trecentonovelle = Pernicone, Vincenzo (ed.), 1946. Franco Sacchetti, Il Trecentonovelle, Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
SRS = P. E. Guarnerio (Ed.). (1892/1894). Gli Statuti della Repubblica sassarese, testo logudorese del secolo XIV, nuovamente edito sul codice e annotato. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 13: 1–124.Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Inglese, Guglielmo
2023. The rise of middle voice systems. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2023. Evidence against unidirectionality in the emergence of middle voice systems. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Cennamo, Michela & Claudia Fabrizio
2022. Non-nominative arguments, active impersonals, and control in Latin. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Cotticelli, Paola & Eystein Dahl
2022. Split alignment, mixed alignment, and the spread of accusative morphosyntax in some archaic Indo-European languages. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Eystein
2022. Alignment in Proto-Indo-European. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Eystein Dahl
2022. Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, DOI logo
Dahl, Eystein
2022. Alignment and alignment change in the Indo-European family and beyond. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fabrizio, Claudia
2022. Infinitives and subjecthood between Latin and Old Italian. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Hock, Hans Henrich
2022. Passives and anticausatives in Vedic Sanskrit. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
2022. The origin of ergative case markers. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Melis, Chantal
2022. Alignment changes with Spanish experiential verbs. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Meyer, Robin
2022. Armenian morphosyntactic alignment in diachrony. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Seržant, Ilja A., Björn Wiemer, Eleni Bužarovska, Martina Ivanová, Maxim Makartsev, Stefan Savić, Dmitri Sitchinava, Karolína Skwarska & Mladen Uhlik
2022. Areal and diachronic trends in argument flagging across Slavic. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan
2021. The passive voice in ancient Indo-European languages: inflection, derivation, periphrastic verb forms. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of figures. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of tables. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Series preface. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of abbreviations. In Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European Family, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.