Edited by Bridget Drinka
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 350] 2020
► pp. 163–182
This paper is about the current disconnect between synchronic and diachronic linguistics and the need for historical linguists to take the lead in addressing the big issues in morphology: how agglutination develops into fusion and symbolism, how these techniques are maintained through time, how they devolve into agglutinative or isolating patterns. The formation and reanalysis of allomorphy are central to these developments. The paper advocates a theory of the morphological sign by which allomorphs form subsidiary paradigms and the individual allomorph is both symbol and index: it stands for its exponendum and points to features of its environment. This articulate conception facilitates the detailed analysis and interpretation both of synchronic patterns and of the gradual typological transformations of inflectional systems.