Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2017: Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July – 4 August 2017
Edited by Bridget Drinka
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 350] 2020
► pp. 205–228

Remotivating inflectional classes

An unexpected effect of grammaticalization

In Titsch, a Walser German dialect spoken in the Aosta Valley, a remodeling of the old strong/weak verb classes found in the rest of the Germanic languages has taken place, whereby verbs belonging to the strong class turn out to display both strong and weak past participles. This outcome results from the reuse or exaptation of the original morphological differentiation based on a purely lexically-governed distribution which has been remotivated by associating the morphological features with specific constructional schemas resulting from several processes of grammaticalization.
Keywords: morphology, verb, inflection, grammaticalization, exaptation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Grammaticalization as an adaptive change
    • 2.1Grammaticalization and the complexity mismatch
    • 2.2Grammaticalization and decategorialization
  • 3.The complexity mismatch in Walser German
    • 3.1Conservative and innovative features in the Titsch verbal complex
    • 3.2Remodeling the complexity mismatch
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Bibliography
Published online: 9 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.10gae
References (35)
Bibliography
Angster, M. (2004–05). La perifrasi tue + infinito nel titsch di Gressoney. BA-Thesis, University of Turin.Google Scholar
Angster, M., Bellante, M., Cioffi, R. & Gaeta, L. (2017). I progetti DiWac e ArchiWals. in L. Gaeta (Ed.), Le isole linguistiche tedescofone in Italia. Special issue of Bollettino dell’Atlante Linguistico Italiano, 41, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Angster, L. & Gaeta, L. (2018). Wie kurz sind die Kurzverben? Morphologische Merkmale in Gressoney und Issime. In S. Rabanus (Ed.), Deutsch als Minderheitensprache in Italien. Theorie und Empirie kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandels. Special issue of Germanistische Linguistik, pp. 239–240, 211–237.Google Scholar
Bohnenberger, K. (1913). Die Mundart der deutschen Walliser im Heimatland und in den Außenorten. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Del Negro, S. (2004). The Decay of a Language: The Case of a German Dialect in the Italian Alps. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Donaldson, B. C. (1993). A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, J. (2007). Zur Herkunft des flektierten prädikativen Adjektivs im Höchstalemannischen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 74(2/3), 196–240.Google Scholar
Francis, E. J. & Michaelis, L. A. (2003). Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory. In E. J. Francis & L. A. Michaelis (Eds.), Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar (pp. 1–27). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gaeta, L. (2008). Mismatch: Grammar distortion and grammaticalization. In M. J. López-Couso & E. Seoane (Eds.), Rethinking Grammaticalization. New perspectives (pp. 103–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). The invisible hand of grammaticalization: West-Germanic substitutive infinitive and the prefix ge- . In W. U. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, H. Ch. Luschützky & F. Rainer (Eds.), Variation and change in morphology (pp. 89–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Multiple sources for the German scandal construction. Studies in Language, 37(3), 566–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). On decategorization and its relevance in German. In R. Simone & F. Masini (Eds.), Word classes: nature, typology and representations (pp. 227–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2016). Co-opting exaptation in a theory of language change. In M. Norde & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Exaptation in language change (pp. 57–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Im Passiv sprechen in den Alpen. Sprachwissenschaft, 43(2), 221–250.Google Scholar
Harris, A. C. (2003). Cross-linguistic perspectives on syntactic change. In B. D. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 529–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.. (2004). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1990). How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Ch. (1989). Markedness and grammaticalization. In O. Tomić (Ed.), Markedness in synchrony and diachrony (pp. 175–190). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murelli, A. (2017). Partizipialattribute. In L. Gunkel, A. Murelli, S. Schlotthauer, B. Wiese & G. Zifonun (Eds.), Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Das Nominal (pp. 1807–1838). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, M. & Van de Velde, F. (Eds.) (2016). Exaptation in language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, P. (1998). Typological comparison and linguistic areas: Some introductory remarks. Language Sciences, 20(3), 227–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reese, J. (2007). Swiss German. The Modern Alemannic Vernacular in and around Zurich. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ringe, D. (2006). From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russ, Ch. V. J. (1990). High Alemannic. In Ch. V. J. Russ (Ed.), The Dialects of Modern German. A Linguistic Survey (pp. 364–393). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Ch. (2011). Change and continuity in form–function relationships. In M. Maiden, J. Ch. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages. Volume 1: Structures (pp. 268–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, R. (2009). Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, Th. (2017). Die TUN-Periphrase im Niederdeutschen. Funktionale und formale Aspekte. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Wiemer, B. (2011). The grammaticalization of passives. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 535–546). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, P. (1989). Zur Passivbildung mit kommen im Südbairischen. In W. Putschke, W. Veith & P. Wiesinger (Eds.), Dialektgeographie und Dialektologie (pp. 256–268). Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Zürrer, P. (1982). Wörterbuch der Mundart von Gressoney. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Zybatow, T. & Weskott, Th. (2018). Das Doppelperfekt: Theorie und Empirie. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 37(1), 83–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Drinka, Bridget & Whitney Chappell
2021. New perspectives on Spanish socio-historical linguistics. In Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 12], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Gaeta, Livio & Guido Seiler
2021. A specter is haunting Europe: the Alps as a linguistic area?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.