References
Ban, L. & Matovac, D.
(2012) On Turkish loanwords in Croatian language. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2:4, 155–166.Google Scholar
Becker, M., Ketrez, N. & Nevins, A.
(2011) The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87:1, 84–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Hayes, B.
(2001) Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45–86.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cahen, L.
(1920) Serbian-English and English-Serbian pocket dictionary. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M. & Baayen, H.
(2003) Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79, 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, V.
(2003) Turkish in Macedonia and beyond: Studies in contact, typology and other phenomena in the Balkans and the Caucasus. Turcologica 52. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L.
(2005) Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1:2, 151–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 59:1, 30–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W.
(1997) The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kamusella, T.
(2012) The politics of language and nationalism in modern central Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Manova, S. & W. U. Dressler
(2001) Gender and declensional class in Bulgarian. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 67, 45–81.Google Scholar
Mønnesland, S.
(1973) Loanwords in the two variants of Serbo-Croatian. Scando-Slavica, 19:1, 197–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, C.
(2006) Optimizing gender. Lingua, 116, 1394–1417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simonović, M.
(2010) Lexeme formation, morphological parsing and constituency in loanword adaptation: A case study from Slovenian and Serbo-Croatian. Poster presented at the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, Hungary.
Sjoberg, M. J.
(1972) Turkish loanwords in the language of Aleksa Šantić. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Škaljić, A.
(1966) Turcizmi u srpskohrvatskom jeziki [Turkisms in the Serbo-Croatian language]. Sarajevo: Svjetlost Izdavačko Preduzeće.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C.
(1996) The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 566–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walter, M. A.
(2011) Probability matching in Arabic and Romance morphology. In E. Broselow & H. Ouali (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Probability matching and Macedonian gender morphology: The case of Turkish loanword adaptation. Presentation at the 11th Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Potsdam, Germany.
(2017) Frequency distributions as faithfulness targets: Or, why Bulgarian feminized Turkish nouns. In Y. Oseki, M. Esipova, & S. Harves (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Wonnacott, E. & E. L. Newport
(2005) Novelty and regularization: The effect of novel instances on rule formation. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Zuraw, K.
(2000) Patterned exceptions in phonology. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar