Chapter published in:
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 215244
References
Adams, Douglas Q.
1978: On the development of the Tocharian verbal system. Journal of the American Oriental Society 98. 277–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Tocharian historical phonology and Morphology (American Oriental Series 71). New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Batke, Christiane
1999Das Präsens und Imperfekt der Verben für “Sein” im Tocharischen. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies 8. 1–74.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko & Giorgio Iemmolo
2015Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 287), 29–51. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breu, Walter
1988Resultativität, Perfekt und die Gliederung der Aspektdimension. In Jochen Raecke (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik 1987: Referate des XIII. Konstanzer Arbeitstreffens Tübingen, 22.-25.9.1987 (Slavistische Beiträge 230), 42–74. Munich: Sagner.Google Scholar
1998Sopostavlenie slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida i vida romanskogo tipa (aorist: imperfekt: perfekt) na osnove vzaimodejstvija s leksikoj. In Marina Ju. Čertkova (ed.), Tipologija vida. Problemy, poiski, rešenija, 88–98. Moscow: Jazyki Russkoj Kultury.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carling, Gerd, Georges-Jean Pinault & Werner Winter
2009: Dictionary and thesaurus of Tocharian A. Volume 1: A-J. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
CEToM: A comprehensive edition of Tocharian manuscripts
ed. by Melanie Malzahn, Michaël Peyrot, Hannes A. Fellner et al. URL https://​www​.univie​.ac​.at​/tocharian​/?manuscripts Accessed May-October 2017
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1989Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
ed. 2000Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Eurotyp 6). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Eva Hedin
2000Current relevance and event reference. In Dahl (ed.), 385–401.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (Typological Studies in Language 3), 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackstein, Olav
2005Archaismus oder historischer Sprachkontakt. Zur Frage westindogermanisch-tocharischer Konvergenzen. In Gerhard Meiser & Olav Hackstein (eds.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel. Akten der XI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17.–23. September 2000, Halle an der Saale, 169–184. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice
1981Georgian syntax: A study in relational grammar (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1994Passive participles across languages. In Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function (Typological Studies in Language 27), 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Kyoko
1979An analysis of the English present perfect. Linguistics 17. 561–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Xianlin, Werner Winter & George-Jean Pinault
1998Fragments of the Tocharian A Maitreyasamiti-Nāṭaka of the Xinjiang Museum, China. Transliterated, translated and annotated by Ji Xianlin in collaboration with Werner Winter, Georges-Jean Pinault. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 113). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang & Werner Thomas
1960Tocharisches Elementarbuch, Band I. Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko
2000The perfect: aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Dahl (ed.), 365–383.Google Scholar
LIV2 = Rix, Helmut
2001Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Malzahn, Melanie
2007The most archaic manuscripts of Tocharian B and the varieties of the Tocharian B language. In Melanie Malzahn (ed.), Instrumenta Tocharica, 255–297. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
2010The Tocharian verbal system (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 3). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James
1971Tense and time reference in English. In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics, 96–113. Irvington: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
MacCoard, Robert W.
1978The English perfect: Tense-choice and pragmatic inferences (North Holland Linguistic Series 38). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Meier-Brügger, Michael
2010: Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. 9th revised and expanded edn. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Narten, Johanna
1964Die sigmatischen Aoriste im Veda. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov
1988The typology of resultative constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions (Typological Studies in Language 12), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peyrot, Michaël
2008Variation and change in Tocharian B (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 15). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald A.
1990The Tocharian active s-preterite: A classical sigmatic aorist. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, 51. 183–242.Google Scholar
Serebrennikov, Boris A.
1974Veroyatnostnye obosnovaniya v komparativistike [Probability explanations in linguistics]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2012The so-called possessive perfect in North Russian and the Circum-Baltic area. A diachronic and areal account. Lingua 122. 356–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Das Kausativ im Tocharischen (LINCOM Studies in Indo-European Linguistics 44). Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
2016Periphrastic perfect / resultative in Tocharian. In Timur A. Maysak, Vladimir A. Plungyan, & Ksenia P. Semenova (eds.), Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki, 7: Tipologiya perfekta [Investigations into the theory of grammar: The typology of the perfect] (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 12.2), 237–288. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sieg, Emil
1944Übersetzungen aus dem Tocharischen I (Abhandlungen der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Jg. 1943, Nr. 16.) Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
1952Übersetzungen aus dem Tocharischen II. Aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Werner Thomas. (Abhandlungen der deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse für Sprachen, Literatur und Kunst, Jg. 1951, Nr. 1.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sieg, Emil & Wilhelm Siegling
1916[1908]Tocharisch, die Sprache der Indoskythen (Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1908, Nr. 39). Berlin: Reimer. [Offprint of 1908, in: Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften 1908, Mitteilung v. 16. Juli, 915–934.]Google Scholar
Tamai, Tatsushi
2012Tocharian Puṇyavantajātaka. Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 15. 161–187.Google Scholar
Thomas, Werner
1954Die Infinitive im Tocharischen. In Johannes Schubert & Ulrich Schneider (eds.), Asiatica. Festschrift Friedrich Weller, zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet von seinen Freunden, Kollegen und Schülern, 701–764. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1957Der Gebrauch der Vergangenheitstempora im Tocharischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zenon
1957Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66. 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Werner
1994Zum tocharischen Verb. In Bernfried Schlerath (ed.), Tocharisch. Akten der Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Berlin, September 1990 (Tocharian and Indo-European Studies, Supplementary Series 4), 284–308. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar